Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

High-achieving High School Students' Science Activities, Self-concept, and Choice of a Science Major

학업 성취가 뛰어난 고등학생들의 과학 활동, 자아 개념, 과학 전공

  • Received : 2010.11.05
  • Accepted : 2010.12.09
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research project is to explain why high-achieving high school students in our country do or do not choose a science major and to explore gender differences. First-year students attending science high schools and international high school participated, responding to open-ended questions on science activities, self-concept of strengths for science learning, and rationales for choosing or not choosing a science major. For high- achieving students, it is shown that intrinsic interest has the greatest correlation with choosing a science major, with the next important influence being self-efficacy. On the other hand, in not choosing a science major, the lack of self-efficacy has a greater correlation than the lack of intrinsic interest. Self-concept in science-learning and science activities occurring outside of school classes are also compared and analyzed, and implications are discussed from educational and policy viewpoints.

본 연구의 목적은 학업 성취가 매우 뛰어난 우리나라 고등학생들이 이공계 진로를 선택하거나 또는 선택하지 않는 이유를 설명하며 성별차를 탐구하는 것이다. 과학고등학교와 국제고등학교에 재학 중인 1학년 학생들이 참여하여 과학 활동, 과학 학습을 위한 자신의 강점, 과학 전공을 선택하거나 선택하지 않는 이유를 묻는 개방형 문항에 응답하였다. 학업성취가 뛰어난 고등학생들의 과학 전공 선택 이유로서는 내적 흥미가 가장 비중이 크며 다음으로 자기효능감의 비중이 큰 것으로 드러났다. 그러나 과학을 전공으로 선택하지 않으려는 것에는 흥미의 부족보다는 자기효능감의 부족이 더 큰 관련이 있는 것으로 드러났다. 이 외에 과학 학습에 대한 자아개념과 정규 수업 외의 과학 활동을 분석하고 비교하였으며 교육적, 정책적 시사점들을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤진 (2007). 학생들의 과학진로 선택 과정에 영향을 미치는 요인들 간의 인과관계 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), 570-582.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  3. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. 6. Self efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1-44). Greenwich, CT: AIP-Information Age Publishing.
  5. Eccles, J. C., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003
  6. Eccles, J. C., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  7. Enman, M., & Lupart, J. (2000). Talented female students' resistance to science: an exploratory study of post-secondary achievement motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Ability Studies, 11, 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130020001205
  8. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, L., & Rotella, S. C. (1999). Antecedent factors differentiating women and men in science/nonscience careers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 763-780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00396.x
  9. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
  10. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/ mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749515
  11. Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000405
  12. Hollinger, C. L. (1983). Self-perception of the career aspirations of mathematically talented female adolescents. Journal Vocational Behavior, 22, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(83)90005-2
  13. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356- 362.
  14. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 265-269.
  15. Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1995). Motivational patterns related to gifted students' learning of mathematics, science and English: an examination of gender differences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329501800305
  16. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Quihuis, G. (2002). Understanding the factors that influence high science achievers' academic choices and intent to pursue or opt out of hard sciences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.
  18. Rejskind, G. (1993, February). Choosing science. Paper presented at the Esther Katz Rosen Symposium on the Psychological Development of Gifted Children, Lawrence, KS.
  19. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Development Psychology, 42, 70-83.
  20. Stake, J. E. (2006). The critical mediating role of social encouragement for science motivation and confidence among high school girls and boys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1017-1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00053.x
  21. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. C. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  22. Woolnough, B. E., & Guo, Y. (1997). Factors affecting student choice of career in science and engineering: Parallel studies in Australia, Canada, China, England, Japan and Portugal. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150108
  23. Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Journal, 37, 215-246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001215