DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the fracture strength of collarless metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures

  • Yoon, Jong-Wook (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2010.10.08
  • Accepted : 2010.12.13
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to evaluate fracture strength of collarless metal-ceramic FPDs according to their metal coping designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different facial margin design groups were investigated. Group A was a coping with a thin facial metal collar, group B was a collarless coping with its facial metal to the shoulder, group C was a collarless coping with its facial metal 1 mm short of the shoulder, and group D was a collarless coping with its facial metal 2 mm short of the shoulder. Fifteen 3-unit collarless metal-ceramic FPDs were fabricated in each group. Finished FPDs were cemented to PBT (Polybutylene terephthalate) dies with resin cement. The fracture strength test was carried out using universal testing machine (Instron 4465, Instron Co., Norwood MA, USA) at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Aluminum foil folded to about 1 mm of thickness was inserted between the plunger tip and the incisal edge of the pontic. Vertical load was applied until catastrophic porcelain fracture occurred. RESULTS. The greater the bulk of unsupported facial shoulder porcelain was, the lower the fracture strength became. However, there were no significant differences between experimental groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION. All groups of collarless metal-ceramic FPDs had higher fracture strength than maximum incisive biting force. Modified collarless metal-ceramic FPD can be an alternative to all-ceramic FPDs in clinical situations.

Keywords

References

  1. Geller W. Dark and shaded zones-one of the important aspects of the W. Geller creative color technic. Quintessenz Zahntech 1982;8:467-73.
  2. Touati B, Miara P. Light transmission in bonded ceramic restorations. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:11-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00738.x
  3. Cornell DF. Soft tissue-ceramic interface: true parameter for successful esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:81-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1995.tb00566.x
  4. O'Boyle KH, Norling BK, Cagna DR, Phoenix RD. An investigation of new metal framework design for metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:295-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70029-5
  5. Choung CK, Garlapo DA, Brown MH, Sorensen SE. Procedure for a simplified collarless metal-ceramic restoration using gold powder. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:449-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(82)80100-5
  6. Behrend DA. Ceramometal restorations with supragingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:625-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90136-6
  7. Lehner CR, Mannchen R, Scharer P. Variable reduced metal support for collarless metal ceramic crowns: a new model for strength evaluation. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:337-45.
  8. Ulusoy M, Toksavul S. Fracture resistance of five different metal framework designs for metal-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:571-4.
  9. Yun JW, Yang JH, Chang IT, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on fracture strength of collarless metal ceramic crown with different metal coping design. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:454-64.
  10. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago; Quintessence Publishing; 1997. p. 142-8.
  11. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171-5.
  12. Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C. The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:323-31. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040583
  13. Schneider DM, Levi MS, Mori DF. Porcelain shoulder adaptation using direct refractory dies. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:583-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90309-7
  14. Goodacre CJ, Van Roekel NB, Dykema RW, Ullmann RB. The collarless metal-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:615-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90004-X
  15. Toogood GD, Archibald JF. Technique for establishing porcelain margins. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:464-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90134-8
  16. Vryonis P. A simplified approach to the complete porcelain margin. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:592-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90260-9
  17. Prince J, Donovan TE, Presswood RG. The all-porcelain labial margin for ceramometal restorations: a new concept. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:793-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90091-4
  18. Edge MJ, Maccarone T. An alternate method for establishing porcelain margins. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:276-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90296-4
  19. Pinnell DC, Latta GH Jr, Evans JG. Light-cured porcelain margins: a new technique. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:50-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(87)80142-7
  20. Belles DM, Cronin RJ Jr, Duke ES. Effect of metal design and technique on the marginal characteristics of the collarless metal ceramic restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:611-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90193-Z
  21. Boyle JJ Jr, Naylor WP, Blackman RB. Marginal accuracy of metal ceramic restorations with porcelain facial margins. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90234-F
  22. Warpeha WS Jr, Goodkind RJ. Design and technique variables affecting fracture resistance of metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:291-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90253-5
  23. Smith TB, Kelly JR, Tesk JA. In vitro fracture behavior of ceramic and metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 1994;3:138-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00144.x
  24. Kheradmandan S, Koutayas SO, Bernhard M, Strub JR. Fracture strength of four different types of anterior 3-unit bridges after thermo-mechanical fatigue in the dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:361-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00742.x
  25. Kern M, Douglas WH, Fechtig T, Strub JR, DeLong R. Fracture strength of all-porcelain, resin-bonded bridges after testing in an artificial oral environment. J Dent 1993;21:117-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90160-R
  26. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:387-91.
  27. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-7.
  28. Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:329-38.
  29. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Tensile stress in glass-ceramic crowns: effect of flaws and cement voids. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:351-8.
  30. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  31. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995;40:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
  32. Miller A, Long J, Miller B, Cole J. Comparison of the fracture strengths of ceramometal crowns versus several all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90281-E
  33. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Imanishi A, Nakamura T, Ishigaki S. Fracture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:951-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00929.x
  34. Rinke S, Huls A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:303-10.
  35. Dickinson AJ, Moore BK, Harris RK, Dykema RW. A comparative study of the strength of aluminous porcelain and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:297-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90132-7
  36. Hwang JW, Yang JH. Fracture strength of copy-milled and conventional In-Ceram crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:678-83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00731.x
  37. Wilson PR, Goodkind RJ, Delong R, Sakaguchi R. Deformation of crowns during cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:601-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90136-Z

Cited by

  1. Effect of Incisal Porcelain Veneering Thickness on the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Zirconia All-Ceramic Anterior Crowns vol.2019, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6548519