References
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
- Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
- Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
- Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5
- Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:500-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90008-6
- Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-5.
- Michaels GC, Carr AB, Larsen PE. Effect of prosthetic superstructure accuracy on the osteointegrated implant bone interface. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90006-8
- Jemt T, Lekholm U, Johansson CB. Bone response to implantsupported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:129-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00003.x
- Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:250-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.38
- Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
- Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:761-8.
- Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8
- Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993;2:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00387.x
- Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70136-3
- Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:39-47.
- Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-66.
- Carr AB, Master J. The accuracy of implant verification casts compared with casts produced from a rigid transfer coping technique. J Prosthodont 1996;5:248-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00507.x
- Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55.
- Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:112-21.
- Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: A three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:533-40.
- Rodney J, Johansen R, Harris W. Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings. J Dent Res 1991;70:385.
- Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7
- Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:371-5.
- Rubenstein JE, Ma T. Comparison of interface relationships between implant components for laser-welded titanium frameworks and standard cast frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:491-5.
Cited by
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology for Implants Considering Operator Experience, Implant Angulation, and Depth vol.17, pp.15230899, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12124
- A Clinical Protocol for Intraoral Digital Impression of Screw-Retained CAD/CAM Framework on Multiple Implants Based on Wavefront Sampling Technology vol.22, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182980fe9
- Comparative Evaluation of Impression Accuracy of Tilted and Straight Implants in All-on-Four Technique vol.23, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000064
- Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review vol.17, pp.15230899, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12310
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Triangulation Technology With Blue Light for Implants vol.24, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000283
- Dimensional accuracy of different techniques used for complete-arch multi-implant impressions vol.7, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12160
- Effects of Implant Angulation and Impression Coping Type on the Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions pp.1056-6163, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000336
- Effects of Impression Coping Design, Impression Technique, and Dental Undercuts on the Accuracy of Implant Impressions Assessed by 3-Dimensional Optical Scanning vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000389
- A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12764
- Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12799
- Accuracy of a self-perforating impression tray for dental implants vol.112, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.012
- Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study vol.19, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2373
- Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation vol.12, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111763
- Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations vol.16, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.270785
- Assessment of intraoral scanning technology for multiple implant impressions - A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.20, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_379_19
- Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants : Accuracy of impressions in multiple and angulated implants vol.16, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00225-3
- The impact of impression coping geometrical design on accuracy of implant impressions: an experimental study vol.6, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00256-0
- Reverse engineering technique on the evaluation of impression accuracy in angulated implants vol.59, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.3.261