Childhood Kidney Diseases

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.195-202
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2384-0242(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0250(eISSN)
대한소아신장학회 (Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

급성신우신염 환아에서 DMSA 스캔상 발견된 신결손의 예후 인자

Prognostic Factors of Renal Defects on the Initial DMSA Scan in Children with Acute Pyelonephritis

  • 서영선 (아주대학교 의과대학교 소아과학교실) ;
  • 권덕근 (아주대학교 의과대학교 소아과학교실) ;
  • 신윤혜 (아주대학교 의과대학교 소아과학교실) ;
  • 배기수 (아주대학교 의과대학교 소아과학교실)
  • Seon, Yeong-Seon (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Duck-Geun (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Yun-Hyea (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pai, Ki-Soo (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.20
  • 심사 : 2010.10.19
  • 발행 : 2010.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목 적 : 요로감염 환아에서 영구적 신장손상을 예측하기 위하여, 연령, 발열기간 및 농뇨 지속기간, 방광요관역류나 수신증 여부 등을 비교, 분석하였다. 방 법 : 2000년 1월부터 2005년 1월까지 아주대학교 병원에서 요로감염으로 입원한 환아 중 DMSA에서 신장 결손을 보인 160명의 환아를 대상으로 6개월 후 추적 DMSA에서 회복된 회복군과 반흔이 남은 반흔군으로 나누어 각각의 특징을 비교분석하였다. 결 과 : 전체 대상 환아 160명 중 106명이 추적 DMSA에서 회복을 보였고, 54명이 반흔이 남아 33.8%의 발생률을 보였다. 반흔군에서 처음 진단 당시의 나이가1세 이상인 환자가 회복군에 비해 많았고(P=0.01), 발열기간, 농뇨지속 기간 등이 회복군에 비해 길었으며, 발열의 기왕력이 있었다. VCUG, Ultra-sound sonography에서도 반흔군이 회복군에 비해 비정상적 결과를 보인 경우가 많았다. 결 론 : 급성신우신염을 앓은 소아에서 감염당시 환아의 나이가 많을수록, 발열 기간이나 농뇨 지속 기간이 오래 될수록, 방광요관역류나 초음파검사 이상소견이 있는 초기 신결손이 신반흔으로 고착되는 경향을 확인할 수 있었다. 특히 잦은 발열 기왕력이 있는 경우 신손상 발생률이 높은 것을 볼 때, 이는 임상에서 미처 진단되지 못한, 혹은 잘 못 진단된 급성신우신염이 있음을 시사해 준다.

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to determine if there are prognostic factors leading to permanent parenchymal damages to kidney in children after acute pyelonephritis. Methods : This study was conducted in 160 pediatric patients with acute pyelonephritis admitted to Ajou University Hospital from 2000 to 2005, whose renal cortical defects were confirmed by $^{99m}Tc$-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy (DMSA scan). Along with the follow-up DMSA scan after 6 months, they were classified into two groups; recovered group (106) and scarred group (54). The clinical characteristics of each group were compared. Results : Among the total of 160 patients, 106 (66.3%) showed recovery of the initial defect (the recovered group), while 54 (33.8%) showed permanent defects on the followup DMSA scan (scarred group). Recovery rate was poor for patients of 1 year and older, or patients with the duration of fever and pyuria longer than 7 days. The recovery rate was poor in the patients with history of frequent febrile episodes and abnormal results of imaging studies, such as voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), ultrasonography. Conclusion : The recovery rate of children with renal defects on DMSA scan with acute pyelonephritis was lower when the patient is older than 1 year, when the duration of fever and pyuria exceeded 7 days, and when the patients had the histories of frequent febrile episodes and had urinary tract abnormalities on imaging studies. These findings suggest that there may be under- or mis-diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis by pediatrician.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Marid S, Jodal U Incidence rate of first-time symptomatic urinary tract infection in children under 6 years of age. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:549-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01502.x
  2. Jakobsson B, So derlundh S, Berg U. Diagnostic significance of 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy in urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child 1992;67: 1338-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.67.11.1338
  3. Benador D, Benador N, Slosman DO, Nussle D, Mermillod B, Girardin E. Cortical scintigraphy in the evaluation of parenchymal changes in children with pyelonephritis. J Pediatr 1994;124:17-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70248-9
  4. Jacobson SH, Eklof O, Goran Eriksson C, Lins LE, Tidgren B, Wingerg J. Development of hypertension and uraemia after pyelonephritis in childhood: 27 year follow-up BMJ 1989;299:703-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6701.703
  5. Sandrine L, Martin C, Tim U, Francois D, Aline SA, Valerie M, et al. Impressive renal damage after acute pyelonephritis in a child. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:1365-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1461-x
  6. Hodson J, Kincaid-Smith. Reflux nephropathy. P(eds) Masson Pub, New York 1979; 352.
  7. Hohenfellner R, Riedmuller H. Vesikoureteraler reflux. In: Hohenfellner R, Thu roff JW, Wchulte-Wissermann H editors. Kinderurologie in klinik and praxis. Thieme, Suttgart New York, 1986; 295-306(cited from Riccabona M, Fotter R. Urinary tract infection in infants and children an update with special regard to the changing role of reflux. Eur Radiol 2004;14:L78-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2030-5
  8. Rollerston GL, Maline TMJ, Hodson CJ. Intrarenal reflux and the scarred kidney. Arch Dis Child 1974;49:531-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.49.7.531
  9. Smellie JM, Poulton A, Prescod NP. Retrospective study of children with renal scarring associated with reflux and urinary infection. BMJ 1994 308:1193-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1193
  10. Jung JI, Lim DH, Yim HE, Park MS, You KH, Hong YS. Fever duration and renal scar in pediatric urinary tract infection. J Korean Soc Pediatr Nephrol 2008;12:70-7. https://doi.org/10.3339/jkspn.2008.12.1.70
  11. Risdon RA. The small scarred kidney in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 1993;7:361-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857538
  12. Jakobsson B, Svensson L. Transient pyelonephritic change on 99m Technetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan for at least five months after infection. Acta Pediatr 1997; 147:1327-32.
  13. Benador D, Benador N, Slosman D, Mermillod B, Girardin E. Are younger children at highest risk of renal sequelae after pyelonephritis? Lancet 1997;349:17-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)06126-0
  14. Spencer JR, Schaeffer AJ, Paediatric urinary tract infection. Urol Clin North Am 1986;13: 661-72.
  15. Gleeson FV, Gordon I. Imaging in urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child 1991;66: 1282-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.11.1282
  16. Martinnell J, Claesson I, Lindin-Janson G, Jodal U. Urinary infection, reflux and renal scarring in females continuously followed for 18-38years. Pediatr Nephrol 1995;9: 131-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00860724
  17. American Academy of Pediatrics, Commitee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Urinary tract infection. Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. Pediatrics 1999; 103:843-52. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.4.843
  18. Lin KY, Chiu NT, Chen MJ, Lai CH, Huang JJ, Wang YT, et al. Acute pyelonephritis and sequelae of renal scar in pediatric first febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol Nephrol 2003;18:362-5.
  19. Paolo P, Miorin E, Romanello C, Vidal E, Contardo M, Valent F. Pediatrics 2009;124: 23-9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1192
  20. Jung SW, Jung KH, Kim MH, Lee JE, Hong YJ, Son BK. Factors associated with renal scarring in children with a first episode of febrile urinary tract infection. J Korean Soc pediatr Nephrol 2005;9:56-63.
  21. Doganis D, Siafas K, Mavrikou M, Gerge I, Martirosova A, Perperidis G, et al. Does early treatment of urinary tract infection prevent renal damage? Pediatrics 2007;120: 922-8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2334
  22. Riccabona M, Fotter R. Urinary tract infection in infants and children: an update with special regard to the changing role of reflux. Eur Radiol 2004;14:78-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2092-4
  23. Winter Al, Hardy BE, Alton DJ, Arbus GS, Churchill BM. Acquired renal scars in children. J Urol 1983;129:1190-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52634-8
  24. Garin EH, Olavarria F, Garcia Nieto V, Valenciano B, Campos A, Young L. Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis. Pediatrics 2006;111: 626-32.
  25. Rushton HG, Majd M, Jantausch B, Wiedermann BL, Bleman AB. Renal scarring following reflux and nonreflux pyelonephritis in children: evaluation with 99m technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy. J Urol 1992;147:1327-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37555-9
  26. Shah KJ, Robins DG, White RH. renal scarring and vesicoureteral reflux 1978;53:210-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.53.3.210
  27. Jakobsson B, Jacobson SH, Hjalmas K. Vesico-ureteric reflux and other risk factors for renal damage identification of high and low risk children. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999;88:31-9.
  28. Goldman M, Bistritzer T, Horne T, Zoareft I, Aladjem M. The etiology of renal scars in infants with pyelonephritis and vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephol 2000;14:385-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004670050779

피인용 문헌

  1. 요로감염 소아에서 입원 초기 시행한 DMSA 신 스캔 결과에 따른 임상양상의 차이에 대한 연구: DMSA 신 스캔의 임상적 의미 vol.17, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3339/jkspn.2013.17.2.110
  2. New Insights for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection (Acute Pyelonephritis) in Children vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3339/jkspn.2016.20.2.37
  3. Clinical Characteristics of Febrile UTI First Developed Over 5 Years of Age vol.21, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3339/jkspn.2017.21.1.15