The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study in marginal fit of a pressed ceramic and feldspathic porcelain fused to metal restoration

열-가압을 이용한 금속 도재관과 전통적인 금속 도재관의 변연 적합도 비교 연구

  • Kim, Yoon-Young (Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Yoo, Dong-Yeob (Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Hanyang University Graduate School)
  • 김윤영 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 박윈희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 유동엽 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.09.13
  • Accepted : 2010.10.05
  • Published : 2010.10.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of a ceramic-pressed-to-metal restoration with traditional metal-ceramic restoration. Materials and methods: Duplicating the prepared resin tooth, 20 metal dies were fabricated. Twenty metal copings of 2 groups which were metal ceramic restoration and pressed to metal restoration were fabricated. The marginal opening of each coping was measured with Microscope (BX 60M-36E $41D^{(R)}$: Olympus, Japan). After porcelain build-up, the marginal opening of metal ceramic restoration and pressed to metal restoration ($PoM^{(R)}$: Ivoclar vivadent., Liechtenstein) were also evaluated in the same method. The measurements were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Within the limits of this study, the results were as follows. 1. Metal-ceramic restorations in coping state ($64.93{\pm}12.48\;{\mu}m$) in compared with Metal ceramic restorations after porcelain build-up ($63.43{\pm}12.86\;{\mu}m$) had no significant difference in marginal adaptation. 2. Pressed-metal-ceramic restorations in coping state ($50.00{\pm}12.28\;{\mu}m$) in compared with Pressed metal ceramic restorations after porcelain build-up ($56.72{\pm}13.80\;{\mu}m$) had no significant difference in marginal adaptation. 3. Metal-ceramic restorations in compared Pressed-metal-ceramic restorations had no significant difference in marginal adaptation. Conclusion: Pressed-metal-ceramic restorations have the advantage of being technically less change through using of the lost-wax technique and this allows for the convenience of a full-contour ceramic wax-up as opposed to the more technique-sensitive layering method. Pressed-metal-ceramic restorations may be considered in clinic on the basis of the result of this study and the advantage of this system.

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 전통적인 금속 도재관과 열-가압을 이용한 금속-도재관의 변연 적합도를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 상악 제1소구치 레진 치아를 교합면 2.0 mm, 협, 설면과 인접면을 1.0 mm 두께로 삭제하였으며, 변연 형태는 chamfer margin으로 그리고 축면 경사는 6도 taper로 삭제하였다. 삭제한 레진치를 복제하여 금속 다이 20개를 제작하였고, 이 금속 다이를 인상 채득하여 작업을 위한 석고 다이를 제작하였다. 금속 도재관과 $PoM^{(R)}$ 시스템 (Ivoclar vivadent., Liechtenstein)의 두 그룹으로 나누어 금속 코핑을 각각 10개씩 총 20개를 제작하였으며, 광학 현미경을 이용하여 변연 간격을 측정하였다. 도재 축성 후, 위와 동일한 방법으로 변연 간격을 측정하였다. 통계 처리는 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test와 Mann Whitney U test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 금속 도재관은 코핑 상태 ($64.93{\pm}12.48\;{\mu}m$)와 도재 축성 후 ($63.43{\pm}12.86\;{\mu}m$)의 변연 간격에 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다. 2. $PoM^{(R)}$ 시스템은 코핑 상태 ($50.00{\pm}12.28\;{\mu}m$)와도재축성후($56.72{\pm}13.80\;{\mu}m$)의 변연 간격에 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다. 3. 금속 도재관과 $PoM^{(R)}$ 시스템 변연 간격은 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: $PoM^{(R)}$시스템은 왁스 소결법을 이용해 변화가 적은 기술적인 이점이 있으며, 세밀한 기술을 요구하는 축성 방법과는 대조적으로 왁스 성형으로 도재의 완전한 형태를 만들 수 있는 편리함을 제공하는 장점을 가진다. 본 연구 결과와 이런 장점을 토대로 앞으로 임상적 사용을 고려해 볼 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  2. Kwon YJ, Lee YS, Park WH. Comparative study in marginal adaptation of zirconia cores fabricated with 3 different CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:12-21.
  3. Seo JY, Park IN, Lee KW. Fracture strength between different connector designs of zirconia core for posterior fixed partial dentures manufactured with CAD/CAM system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:29-39.
  4. Kang DR, Shim JS, Moon HS, Lee KW. Marginal fidelity of zirconia core using MAD/MAM system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:1-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.1
  5. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-74.
  6. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of allceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  7. Yoon IJ, Chang WS, Yang JH, Lee SH. A scanning electron microscopic study on the labial marginal fit of metal ceramic crowns made by different techniques. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1986;24:151-64.
  8. Brecker SC. Porcelain baked to gold a new medium in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:801-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(56)90077-4
  9. Goldin EB, Boyd NW 3rd, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.023
  10. Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80272-0
  11. Holden JE, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Clark EA. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restora tions. J Prosthodont 2009;18:645-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x
  12. Kim SS, Lee MK. Comparative study on shear bond strength of press-to-metal ceramic to porcelain fused non precious metal by surface treatment methods. Masters thesis, Department of Dental Laboratory Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Catholic University of Pusan, Pusan, Korea, 2009.
  13. Gorman CM, McDevitt WE, Hill RG. Comparison of two heatpressed all-ceramic dental materials. Dent Mater 2000;16:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00031-2
  14. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123817
  15. Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Hittelman EL. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal. J Prosthodont 2005;14:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00052.x
  16. Bader JD, Rozier RG, McFall WT Jr, Ramsey DL. Effect of crown margins on periodontal conditions in regularly attending patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:75-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90053-Y
  17. Grasso JE, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, Bailit H. Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90056-3
  18. Yang JH, Yeo IS, Lee SH, Han JS, Lee JB. Marginal fit of celay/In-Ceram, Conventional In-Ceram and Empress 2 all-ceramic single crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:131-9.
  19. White SN, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:28-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90235-G
  20. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:786-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90583-V
  21. Seong JY, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JD. The fit of zirconia core fabricated with CAD/CAM system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:489-500.
  22. Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
  23. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  24. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machine- milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:440-7.
  25. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using ccd camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
  26. Groten M, Axmann D, Pro¨bster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  27. Sorensen SE, Larsen IB, Jo¨rgensen KD. Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:109-14.
  28. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5
  29. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  30. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scha¨rer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
  31. Yu JH, Kim YC, Kang DW. A study on the marginal fidelities and fracture strength of IPS Empress 2 ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:606-17.
  32. Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:594-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90153-2
  33. Schweiger M, Holand W. IPS Empress 2: A new pressable highstrength glass-ceramic for esthetic all-ceramic restoration. QDT 1999;143.
  34. Luca L, Dalloca UD. A new esthetic material for anterior crowns: IPS-Empress. QDT 1995;171-5.
  35. Grossman DG. Cast glass ceramics. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29: 725-39.
  36. Venkatachalam B, Goldstein GR, Pines MS, Hittelman EL. Ceramic pressed to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal: a comparative study of bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:94-100.

Cited by

  1. 코핑 두께의 차이에 따른 POM 보철물의 변연적합도 연구 vol.34, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2012.34.2.135