DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selection of an Optimal Welding Condition for Back Bead Formation in GMA Root Pass Welding

GMA 초층용접에서 이면비드 생성을 위한 최적용접조건의 선정

  • Yun, Young-Kil (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Woong (School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Yun, Seok-Chul (Dept. of CAD/CAM, Daegu Mirae College)
  • 윤영길 (영남대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 김재웅 (영남대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 윤석철 (대구미래대학 캐드캠과)
  • Received : 2010.04.21
  • Accepted : 2010.06.22
  • Published : 2010.10.31

Abstract

In GMAW processes, bead geometry is a criterion to estimate welding quality. Bead geometry is affected by welding current, arc voltage, welding speed, shielding gas and so on. Thus the welding condition has to be selected carefully. In this paper, an experimental method for the selection of optimal welding condition was proposed in the root pass welding which was done along the GMA V-grooved butt weld joint. This method uses the response surface analysis in which the width and height of back bead were chosen as the quality variables of the weld. The overall desirability function, which is the combined desirability function for the two quality variables, was used as the objective function for getting the optimal welding condition. Through the experiments, the target values of the back bead width and the height were chosen as 4mm and 1mm respectively for the V-grooved butt weld joint. From a series of welding test, it was revealed that a uniform weld bead can be obtained by adopting the optimal welding condition which was determined according to the method proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. H. B. Cary: Modern Welding Technology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, (1989)
  2. S. D. Park: Welding Engineering, Wonchang, (1995) (in Korean)
  3. C. E. Bull, K. A. Stacey and R. Calcraft: On Line Weld Monitoring Using Ultrasonic, Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 35-2 (1993), 57-64
  4. Y. M. Zhang, R. Kovacevic and L. Li: Characterization and Real-time Measurement of Geometrical Appearance of the Weld Pool, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 36-7 (1996), 799-816 https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(95)00083-6
  5. J. B. Lee, Y. W. Bang. S. W. Oh and H. S. Chang: Control of Bead Geometry in GMAW, Journal of KWS, 15-6 (1993), 116-123 (in Korean)
  6. C. E. Park, C. S. Li and I.S. Kim: Mathematical Models for Optimal Bead Geometry for GMA Welding Process, International Journal of KWS, 3-1 (2003), 8-16
  7. Y. S. Tarng and W. H. Yang: Optimisation of the Weld Bead Geometry in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding by the Taguchi Method, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 14 (1998), 549-554 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301698
  8. H. J. Park, M. J. Kang, B. G. Choi and S. H. Lee: Welding Parameters Optimization of Pleated Type Filter Using Response Surface Methodology, 2004 Annual Spring Meeting of KWS, Jeju Korea, 39-41 (in Korean)
  9. J. Y. Lee, J. W. Kim and C. H. Kim: A Study on the Selection of Fillet Weld Conditions by Considering the Tack Welds, Journal of KWS, 24-5 (2006), 29-36 (in Korean)
  10. S. C. Yun and J. W. Kim: Selection of Optimal Welding Condition in Root-pass Welding of VGroove Butt Joint, Journal of KWJS, 27-1 (2009), 95-101 (in Korean)
  11. G. Derringer and R. Suich: Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variances, Journal of Quality Technology, 12 (1980), 214-219 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
  12. E. D. Casttilo, D. C. Montgomery, and D. R. Mccarville: Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 28-3 (1996), 337-345 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1996.11979684
  13. R. H. Myers and D.C Montgomery: Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons Inc, (1995)
  14. D. C. Montgomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 2nd Ed, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (1984)
  15. S. H. Park: Design of Experiments, Minyoungsa, (2003) (in Korean)

Cited by

  1. Variable impact analysis of linear generator by using response surface method vol.17, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-016-0147-0