DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Multi-microbial Probiotics Produced by Submerged Liquid and Solid Substrate Fermentation Methods in Broilers

  • Shim, Y.H. (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Shinde, P.L. (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, J.Y. (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, J.S. (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Seo, D.K. (Department of Animal Products and Food Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Pak, J.I. (Department of Animal Products and Food Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chae, B.J. (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, I.K. (Department of Animal Products and Food Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2009.08.24
  • 심사 : 2009.11.12
  • 발행 : 2010.04.01

초록

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate multi-microbe submerged liquid (SLF) and solid substrate (SSF) fermented probiotic products in broilers. The SLF and SSF probiotics were comprised of Lactobacillus acidophilus ($1.1{\times}10^9$ and $4{\times}10^8$ cfu/g), Bacillus subtilis ($1.1{\times}10^9$ and $4{\times}10^9$ cfu/g), Saccharomyces cerevisiae ($1.5{\times}10^7$ and $1.0{\times}10^4$ cfu/g) and Aspergillus oryzae ($2.6{\times}10^7$ and $4.3{\times}10^7$ cfu/g), respectively. In Exp. 1, 640 day-old Ross chicks were allotted to 4 treatments, each comprising 4 replicates (40 chicks/replicate). The basal diet was prepared without any antimicrobials (negative control, NC), and 20 mg/kg avilamycin (positive control, PC), 0.3% SLF and 0.3% SSF probiotics were added to the basal diets as treatments. Birds fed PC and SSF diets showed improved (p<0.001) overall weight gain and F/G than birds fed NC and SLF diets; whereas, birds fed SLF diet had better weight gain and F/G than birds fed NC diet. Retention of CP was higher (p<0.05) in birds fed the SSF diet than birds fed PC, SLF and NC diets. Birds fed the SLF diet tended to have higher (p<0.10) cecal total anaerobic bacteria than birds fed PC and NC diets; whereas, lesser cecal coliforms were noticed in birds fed PC, SLF and SSF diets than birds fed the NC diet. In Exp. 2, 640 day-old Ross chicks were randomly allotted to 4 treatments in a $2{\times}2$ factorial arrangement. Each treatment had 4 replicates (40 chicks/replicate). Two different multi-microbe probiotic products (0.3% SLF or SSF) each with two different antibiotics (10 mg/kg colistin, or 20 mg/kg avilamycin) were used as dietary treatments. Birds fed the SSF diet had greater weight gain (p<0.001), better F/G (p<0.05), greater retention of energy (p<0.001) and protein (p<0.05), and lesser cecal Clostridium (d 35) than birds fed SLF diet. Birds fed the colistin-supplemented diet had less (p<0.01) cecal coliforms when compared with birds fed the avilamycin diet. Additionally, birds fed the avilamycin diet had greater energy retention (p<0.05) than birds fed the colistin diet. Thus, the results of this study suggest the multi-microbe probiotic product prepared by a solid substrate fermentation method to be superior to the probiotic product prepared by submerged liquid fermentation; moreover, feeding of probiotics with different antibiotics did not elicit any interaction effect between probiotic and antibiotic.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA
  2. Badu, K. R. and T. Satyanarayana. 1995. α-Amylase production by thermophilic Bacillus coagulans in solid state fermentation. Process Biochem. 30:305-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(95)87038-5
  3. Barrow, P. A. 1992. Probiotics for chickens. In: Probiotics: The Scientific Basis (Ed. R. Fuller). Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 225-257
  4. Battan, B., J. Sharma and R. C. Kuhad. 2006. High-level xylanase production by alkaliphilic Bacillus pumilus ASH under solidstate fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22:1281-1287 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9173-x
  5. Cavazzoni, V., A. Adami and C. Castrovilli. 1998. Performance of broiler chicken supplemented with Bacillus coagilans as probiotic. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:526-529 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669888719
  6. Chen, K.-L., W.-L. Kho, S.-H. You, R.-H. Yeh, S.-W. Tang and C.-W. Hsieh. 2009. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:309-315 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00224
  7. Choi, J. Y., P. L. Shinde, I. K. Kwon, Y. H. Song and B. J. Chae. 2009. Effect of wood vinegar on the performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microflora in weanling pigs. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:267-274
  8. Denev, S. A. 2006. Effect of different growth promoters on the cecal microflora and performance of broiler chickens. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 12:461-474
  9. Dibner, J. J. and J. D. Richards. 2005. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poult. Sci. 84:634-643
  10. El-bendary, M. A. 2006. Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus biopesticides production. J. Basic Microbiol. 46:158-170 https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200510585
  11. Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  12. Ferket, P. R. 2004. Alternatives to antibiotics in poultry production: responses, practical experience and recommendations. In: Nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industries (Ed. T.P. Lyons and K.A. Jacques)
  13. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham. pp. 57-67. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals - a review. J. Appl. Bacterol. 66:365-378 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  14. Graminha, E. B. N., A. Z. L. Goncalves, R. D. P. B. Pirota, M. A. A. Balsalobre, R. Da Silva and E. Gomes. 2008. Enzyme production by solid-state fermentation: application to animal nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 144:1-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.029
  15. Hu, J., W. Lu, C. Wang, R. Zhu and J. Qiao. 2008. Characteristics of solid-state fermented feed and its effects on performance and nutrient digestibility in growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1635-1641
  16. Jernigan, M. A., R. D. Miles and A. S. Arafa. 1985. Probiotics in poultry nutrition - a review. World's Poult. Sci. J. 41:99-107 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19850008
  17. Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaudin. 1997. Probiotics in poultry: modes of action. World's Poult. Sci. J. 53:351-368 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19970028
  18. Kabir, S. M. L., M. M. Rahman, M. B. Rahman, M. M. Rahman and S. U. Ahmed. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3:361-364 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.361.364
  19. Line, E. J., S. J. Bailey, N. A. Cox, N. J. Stern and T. Tompkins. 1998. Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poult. Sci. 77:405-410
  20. Lu, M. Y., I. S. Maddox and J. D. Brooks. 1998. Application of a multi-layer packed bed reactor to citric acid production in solid state fermentation using Aspergillus niger. Process Biochem. 33:117-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(97)00037-X
  21. Mitchell, D. A. and B. K. Lonsane. 1992. Definition characteristics and potential. In: Solid substrate cultivation (Ed. H. W. Doelle, D. A. Mitchell and C. E. Rolz). Elsevier, London. pp. 1-16
  22. Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteric acid. J. Biol. Sci. 238:235
  23. Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult. Sci. 86:309-317
  24. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  25. Nousiainen, J. and J. Setala. 1993. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In: Lactic acid bacteria (Ed. S. Salminen and A. won Wright). Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 315-356
  26. Ohh, S. H., P. L. Shinde, Z. Jin, J. Y. Choi, T.-W. Hahn, H. T. Lim, G. Y. Kim, Y. Park, K.-S. Hahm and B. J. Chae. 2009. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Gogu valley) protein as an antimicrobial agent in the diets of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:1227-1234 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00491
  27. Owings, W. J., D. L. Reynolds, R. J. Hasiak and P. R. Ferket. 1990. Influence of a dietary supplementation with Streptococcus faecium M-74 on broiler body weight, feed conversion, carcass characteristics and intestinal microbial colonization. Poult. Sci. 69:1257-1264 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691257
  28. Pascual, M., M. Hugas, J. I. Badiola, J. M. Monfort and M. Garriga. 1999. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4981-4986
  29. Patel, H. M., R. Wang, O. Chandrashekar, S. S. Pandiella and C. Webb. 2004. Proliferation of Lactobacillus plantarum in solidstate fermentation of oats. Biotechnol. Prog. 20:110-116 https://doi.org/10.1021/bp034176r
  30. Pollman, D. S., D. M. Danielson and E. R. Peo. 1980. Effects of microbial feed additives on performance of starter and growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 51:577-581
  31. Raimbault, M. 1998. General and micorbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 1(3):1-15
  32. Robinson, T., D. Singh and P. Nigam. 2001. Solid-state fermentation: a promising microbial technology for secondary metabolite production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55:284-289 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000565
  33. Ross, R. P., C. Desmond, G. F. Fitzgerald and C. Stanton. 2005. Overcoming the technological hurdles in the development of probiotic foods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98:1410-1417 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02654.x
  34. Sanders, M. E. and J. H. Veld. 1999. Bringing a probiotic containing functional food to the market: microbiological, product, regulatory and labeling issues. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76: 93-315
  35. SAS. 1996. SAS/STAT. User's Guide: Statistics (Release 6.12 Ed.). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary. NC
  36. Stavric, S. and E. T. Kornegay. 1995. Microbial probiotic for pigs and poultry. In: Biotechnology in animal feeds and animal feeding (Ed. R. J. Wallace and A. Chesson). VCH, Weinheim, pp. 205-231 https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527615353.ch10
  37. Tannock, G. W. 2001. Molecular assessment of intestinal microflora. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:410-414
  38. Timmerman, H. M., C. J. M. Koningb, L. Mulderc, F. M. Romboutsd and A. C. Beynen. 2004. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics: A comparison of functionality and efficacy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 96:219-233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012
  39. Weitnauer, G., A. Muhlenweg, A. Trefzer, D. Hoffmeister, R. D. Sussmuth, G. Jung, K. Welzel, A. Vente, U. Girreser and A. Bechthold. 2001. Biosynthesis of the orthosomycin antibiotic avilamycin A: deductions from the molecular analysis of the avi biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tu57 and production of new antibiotics. Chem. Biol. 8:569-581 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00040-0
  40. Wellenreiter, R. H., D. H. Mowrey, L. A. Stobbs and J. A. D'assonville. 2000: Effects of avilamycin on performance of broiler chickens. Vet. Ther. 1(2):118-124
  41. Ziv, G. 1981. Clinical pharmacology of polymyxins. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 179:711-715

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of supplementation of multi-microbe probiotic product on growth performance, apparent digestibility, cecal microbiota and small intestinal morphology of broilers vol.96, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01187.x
  2. A multi-microbe probiotic formulation processed at low and high drying temperatures: effects on growth performance, nutrient retention and caecal microbiology of broilers vol.53, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.690508
  3. Effects of Origins of Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Fecal Microflora of Growing Pigs vol.55, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.4.263
  4. by-products fermented with multistrain probiotics on growth performance, immunity, caecal microbiology and meat oxidative stability in broilers vol.55, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.938021
  5. ) vol.48, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13099
  6. Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers vol.88, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150071
  7. Bacteriophage cocktail and multi-strain probiotics in the feed for weanling pigs: effects on intestine morphology and targeted intestinal coliforms and Clostridium vol.11, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001166
  8. Safety assessment of antibiotic and probiotic feed additives for Gallus gallus domesticus vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12866-7
  9. Effect of potential multimicrobe probiotic product processed by high drying temperature and antibiotic on performance of weanling pigs1 vol.89, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2794
  10. Improved Production of Spores and Bioactive Metabolites from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Solid-state Fermentation by a Rapid Optimization Process pp.1867-1314, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9474-z
  11. The effects of dietary supplementation with different levels of Microzist as newly developed probiotics on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and immunological organs of broiler chicks vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1467835
  12. Effect of dietary probiotics on the semen traits and antioxidative activity of male broiler breeders vol.8, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24345-8
  13. Effect of Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 Grown on Citrus-juice Waste and Corn-soybean Meal Substrate on Growth Performance, Nutrient Retention, Caecal Microbiology and Small Intestinal Mo vol.24, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10443
  14. Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology vol.93, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.021
  15. An antimicrobial peptide-A3: effects on growth performance, nutrient retention, intestinal and faecal microflora and intestinal morphology of broilers vol.54, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.838746
  16. Effects of Origins of Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Nutrient Retention and Excreta Microflora of Broilers vol.40, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2013.40.2.129
  17. Effects of dietary supplementation ofEcklonia cavawith or without probiotics on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, immunity and intestinal health in weanling pigs vol.15, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2015.1128685
  18. Recent Advances in the Physiology of Spore Formation for Bacillus Probiotic Production vol.11, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9492-x
  19. Evaluation of dietary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis KMP-BCP-1 and Bacillus licheniformis KMP-9) supplementation and their effects on broiler chickens in a tropical region vol.48, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1804916
  20. Composition and inclusion of probiotics in broiler diets alter intestinal permeability and spleen immune cell profiles without negatively affecting performance1 vol.98, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz383
  21. Application of fermentation strategy in aquafeed for sustainable aquaculture vol.12, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12368
  22. Phenomenal Bombardment of Antibiotic in Poultry: Contemplating the Environmental Repercussions vol.17, pp.14, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145053
  23. Effect of multienzymes + probiotic supplementation in fermented shea butter cake based diets on the carcass traits and the biochemistry of broiler chickens vol.12, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15547/ast.2020.03.036
  24. Probiotic fermented feed improved the production, health and nutrient utilisation of yellow-feathered broilers reared in high altitude in Tibet vol.61, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1801988
  25. Ajwain (Trachyspermum copticum) extract in broiler diets: effect on growth performance, carcass components, plasma constituents, immunity and cecum microflora vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.1926347
  26. Bacillus subtilis natto as a potential probiotic in animal nutrition vol.41, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1858019
  27. A Review of the Effects and Production of Spore-Forming Probiotics for Poultry vol.11, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071941
  28. Differences in Acid Stress Response of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Zhang Cultured from Solid-State Fermentation and Liquid-State Fermentation vol.9, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091951