Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회지)

Korean Society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회)
권호 표지

Relation of personality preference, and achievement goal orientation, academic self-efficacy, test anxiety in selecting dental hygiene students

일부 치위생과 학생의 성격선호지표와 성취목표, 학업적 자기효능감, 시험불안의 관계

  • 임순연 (남서울대학교 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2010.10.28
  • Accepted : 2010.12.18
  • Published : 2010.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to identify correlation of personality preference, and achievement goal orientation, academic self-efficacy, test anxiety in selecting college students who majored in dental hygiene. This study also provides a basic data regarding personality for education of dental hygiene students. Methods : 192 students of S college who majored in dental hygiene were asked to answer the MBTI GS form, academic self-efficacy scale, achievement goal orientation scale and test anxiety scale during the month of May, 2009. The total of 160 copies were analyzed. MANOVA, independent-sample t-test were conducted. Results : 1. Looking at distribution of personality preference type of the students, extroversion type (63.1%) was more than introversion type(36.9%), sensing type(87.5%) was more than intuition type(12.5%), thinking type(54.4%) was more than feeling type(45.6%), judging type(59.4%) was more than perceiving type (40.6%) 2. In subscale of achievement goal orientation, performance approach level was higher in extroversion type than in introversion type. Performance avoidance level was lower in extroversion type than in introversion type. However, other preference personality type didn't show any significant difference in subscale of achievement goal orientation. 3. Academic self-efficacy was higher in extroversion type and thinking type than in introversion type and feeling type. There wasn't any significant difference between judging type and perceiving type, sensing type and intuition type. 4. In subscale of academic self-efficacy, confidence was higher in extroversion type than in introversion type. Task difficulty preference and self-regulated efficacy were higher in thinking type than in feeling type. 5. There wasn't any significant difference between personality preference type and test anxiety. Conclusions : Professor should find out difference between students through using information of preference personality and develop a teaching strategy that can encourage strength and make up weakness of each students.

Keywords

References

  1. 노안영, 강영신. 성격심리학. 1판. 서울: 학지사; 2005:18-21.
  2. 김정택, 심혜숙, 제석봉. MBTI개발과 활용. 서울: 한국심리검사연구소; 1995.
  3. 김관수, 박현주. 2008학년도 신입생 성격유형검사 (MBTI). 부산대 학생생활연구 2008;28:34-44.
  4. Woolfolk, A. E. Educational Psychology 4th Ed. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1990.
  5. 채민성. 성격선호지표,학업적자기효능감,시험불안이 치의학전문대학원생의 학업성취에 미치는 영향[석사 학위논문]. 광주: 전남대학교 대학원; 2008.
  6. 한순미. 중다목표관점에서의 성취목표와 자기조절학습전량 사용간의 관계. 교육심리연구 2003;17(3):291-312.
  7. Ames, C. Classrooms: goal, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 1992;84:261-271.
  8. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981;41:586-598.
  9. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. Development of structured interview for assessing use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal 1986;23:614-628.
  10. Spielberger, C. D. Anxiety as an emotional state. Anxiety: Current trends in the theory and research. NY: Academic Press; 1972:23-49.
  11. 정경연. C-MBTI에 나타난 국민학생의 성격유형의 지능 및 학업성취 관계연구[석사학위논문]. 부산: 부산대학교 대학원; 1993.
  12. 박병기, 이종욱. $2{\times}2$ 성취목표지향성 척도의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구 2005;42(4):455-476.
  13. 성소연. $2{\times}2$ 성취목표지향성, 자기조절학습, 학업 성취와의 관계연구[석사학위논문]. 서울: 숙명여대대학원; 2007.
  14. 김아영, 박인영. 학업적 자기효능감척도 개발 및 타당성 연구. 교육학 연구 2001;39(1):95-123.
  15. 고혜영. 교사기대지각, 학문자아개념, 시험불안과 학업성취간의 분석연구[석사학위논문]. 서울: 숙명여자대학교대학원; 1992.
  16. 한혜숙, 원영순. 치위생과 학생들의 성격유형 결과. 한국위생과학회지 2007;13(1):25-30.
  17. 정현경, 김명수, 유연자, 김수옥, 원대영. 간호대학생의 MBTI성격유형과 학습태도, 학업성취도간의 상관성. 간호행정학회지 2007;13(4):516-525.
  18. 김선, 김주현, 허애라. 의과대학생 성격과 학업성취도 비교를 통한 교육방법. 한국의학교육 2005;17(2):107-119.
  19. Jones, A. C., Courts, F. J., Sandow, P. L., & Warson, R. E. Myers-Briggs type indicator and dental school performance. Journal of Dental Education 1997;61:928-933.
  20. Ames, C. Classrooms: goal, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Structures, and Pychology 1992;84:261-271.
  21. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuit: Human needs and selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000;11(4):227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  22. 최병연. 자기효능감, 성취목표지향성, 학습전략 및 학업성취간의 관계분석. 교육문제연구 1998;10:227-253.
  23. 소연희. 의과대학생들의 성취목표지향성과 자기효능감이 수업에 대한 흥미와 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 한국의학교육 2008; 20(1):37-49.
  24. 고유림. 성취목표지향성 프로그램의 개발과 효과 검증[석사학위논문]. 전주: 전북대학교 대학원; 2008.
  25. 이석영. 학업적 자기효능감, 자기결성동기, 학업성취간의 관계연구[석사학위논문]. 서울: 숙명여대 대학원; 2009.
  26. 정정애. 부모양육태도, 학업적 자기효능감, 성취목표지향성이 자기조절 학습에 미치는 영향[석사학위논문]. 강릉: 관동대학교 대학원; 2009.
  27. 조말숙. 초등학생의 성격유형(MMTIC)에 따른 발표 불안 및 시험불안[석사학위논문]. 부산: 부경대학교대학원; 2008.
  28. 양선아. 부모의 학업성취압력 및 자아존중감과 시험 불안과의 관계[석사학위논문]. 성남: 경원대학교 교육대학원; 2009.