Oral Hygiene Management and Factor Analysis of the Community People

일부지역 주민들의 구강환경관리 및 요인분석

  • Park, Hyang-Sook (Department of Dental Hygiene, Shin-Sung University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Statistics, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Mi (Department of Statistics, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Sin (Department of Public Health, School of Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2009.12.24
  • Accepted : 2010.02.15
  • Published : 2010.02.28

Abstract

The subjects of this study were patients at scaling practice, the total number of the subjects was 249 of 138 men and 111 women. The results were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. 1. In oral health care, among tooth brushing methods, scrub method was found to be 65.9%(164 patients), and 83.9%(209 patients) did not use oral care aids. 2. Mean calculus index was $0.57{\pm}0.22$. 3. For calculus index per tooth brushing method, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 4. For calculus index per frequency of tooth brushing, there was statistically significant difference in the upper jaw, the lower jaw, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 5. For calculus index per time of tooth brushing and per use of oral care aids, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 6. For factors influencing calculus index, as a result of applying stepwise method based on 0.05 of significance level, age, use of oral care aids, sex, and time of tooth brushing were found to influence calculus index. Final regression model was calculus index = $0.362^*age+0.216^*$use of oral care aids - $0.161*sex-0.127^*$time of tooth brushing, and explanatory power of the model was 23.4%. $0.362^*age+0.216^*$use of oral care aids - $0.161^*sex-0.127^*$time of tooth brushing, and explanatory power of the model was 23.4%.

본 연구는 2008년 3월부터 2008년 6월까지 S대학 치위생과 3학년들의 스케일링 실습환자를 대상으로 하였으며, 남자 138명, 여자 111명으로 총 249명 대상으로 표본은 비확률표본추출법인 편의추출법에 의해 선정하였다. SPSS 12.0 프로그램을 이용하여 분석하였다. 1. 구강위생관리에서 칫솔질 방법은 횡마법이 65.9%(164명)로 나타났으며, 스케일링 경 험은 57.8%(144명)로 나타났다. 칫솔질 횟수는 2회가 53.8%(134명)로 가장 많았고, 칫솔질 시기는 식사 후가 73.1%(182명)로 나타났다. 구강보조용품은 16.1%(40명)만 이 사용하고 있었다. 2. 부위별 치석지수는 하악이 $0.66{\pm}0.21$, 전치부가 $0.58{\pm}0.23$, 구치부가 $0.57{\pm}0.24$, 상악이 $0.49{\pm}0.26$ 순으로 조사되었으며 평균 치석지수는 $0.57{\pm}0.22$로 나타났다. 3. 칫솔질 방법에 따른 치석지수는 상악은 회전법에 비해 종마법으로 칫솔질을 할수록 치석지수가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 하악의 전치부, 구치부는 횡마법이나 종마법으로 칫솔질을 할수록 치석지수가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 상악과 하악, 전치부와 구치부 모두에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 4. 칫솔질 횟수에 따른 치석지수는 상악과 하악, 구치부에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 5. 칫솔질 시기에 따른 치석지수는 상악과 하악, 전치부와 구치부 모두 칫솔질을 식사 전에 하는 사람의 치석지수가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 상악과 하악, 전치부와 구치부 모두에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 6. 구강용품 사용여부에 따른 치석지수는 상악과 하악, 전치부와 구치부에서 구강용품을 사용하지 않는 사람의 치석지수가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 상악과 하악, 전치부와 구치부 모두에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.01). 7. 치석지수에 영향을 미치는 요인은 유의수준 0.05를 기준으로 stepwise방법을 적용한 결과 나이, 구강보조용품 사용여부, 성별, 칫솔질 시기가 치석지수에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 즉 나이가 많을수록, 구강보조용품을 사용하지 않을수록, 성별이 남자 일수록, 칫솔질을 식사 전에 할수록 치석지수가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 최종 회귀모형은 치석지수 = $0.362^*$나이 + $0.216^*$구강보조용품 사용여부 - $0.161^*$성별 - $0.127^*$ 칫솔질 시기이며 모형의 설명력은 23.4%이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. The Ministry of Health and Welfare: Oral Health Promotion Supporting Committee; Guideliness of 2003 national oral health survey. Korean institute of oral health service. Seoul, pp.102-128, 2003.
  2. Yun EK: A survey on the cognition of oral health care on visited patients. -about periodontal disease- A Master's thesis Graduate School of Environment and Health Chosun University, 2003.
  3. Seo EJ et al.: A survey on Koreans' behavior about the use of oral hygiene devices. J Korean Acad Dent Health 27(2): 177- 193, 2003.
  4. Kim MJ: A study on dental health behaviors, perceived symptoms and occurrence of dental diseases among industrial workers in Korea. A Master's thesis Seoul National University, 2002.
  5. Darby ML, Walsh MM: Dental hygiene theory and practice. 2nd edition. Missouri, Saunders, pp.360, 2003.
  6. Warren PR, Chater BV: An overview of established interdental cleaning methods. J Clin Dent 7(3): 65-69, 1996.
  7. Jeung MO et al.: Usage patterns of oral care products of dental patients. Yeungnam University Journal of Med 24(2): 319-329, 2007.
  8. Kang YJ et al: Oral Health Statistics and Practice. DaehanNarae Publishing, Inc, pp.109-112, 2009.
  9. Kim YS: A study on perceived oral health, oral health promotion and dental impact of daily living. J Korean Acad Dent Health 24(2): 146-147, 2000.
  10. Kim GW: The impact of OHIP level on degree of patients knowledge about dental hygiene. A Master's thesis Department of Public Health Graduate School Keimyung University, 2007.
  11. Cho SS, Choi MH: Recognition on oral health and its care by workers in enterprising place. The Chung-Ang Journal of Nursing 5(1): 25-33, 2001.
  12. Yun HS, Yi HG, Yi SG: Correlation between freshmen's consciousness of dental health and dental hygiene. J Agr Med Community Health 21(1): 99-104, 1996.
  13. Lee SM, Kim EJ: An analysis on dental clinic inpatients awareness about their periodontal health. J Dent Hyg Sci 7(4): 219-224, 2007.
  14. Kim HJ, Bae SM, Choi OS: A study on oral health status of industrial workers Gumi City. J Dent Hyg Sci 5(4): 205-209, 2005.
  15. So HS: The relationship between the initial response to nonsurgical periodontal therapy and emotional intelligence. A Master's thesis Department of Dental Science Chonnam National University Graduate School, 2008.
  16. Park SS, Cho PK: A study on the O' Leary index and dental plague index of dental patients. J Korean Acad Dent Hygiene Education 9(3): 426-436, 2009.
  17. Cho JH: Oral hygienic management and attitude of patients with periodontal disease. A Master's thesis Graduate School of Public Health Kyungpook National University, 2006.