수학적 모델을 활용한 alternating 형태 공정과 recirculating 형태 공정의 성능 평가

Performance Evaluation between Alternating Type Process and Recirculating Type Process by using a Mathematical Model

  • 김효수 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부) ;
  • 김예진 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부) ;
  • 차재환 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부) ;
  • 최수정 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부) ;
  • 민경진 ((주)태화강재산업) ;
  • 김창원 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학부)
  • Kim, Hyosoo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yejin (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cha, Jaewhan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Soojung (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Min, Kyungjin (Taiwha industrial Co., Ltd) ;
  • Kim, Changwon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2009.11.26
  • 심사 : 2009.12.24
  • 발행 : 2010.01.30

초록

In this research, the performance evaluation between an alternating type process and a recirculating type process was investigated by using mathematical models. The Advanced Phase Isolation Ditch (APID) process and the $A^2/O$ process were selected the target processes of the alternating type and recirculating type, respectively. For more quantitative evaluation, 5 performance indexes which included economy and energy efficiency as well as effluent quality were used, and various disturbance conditions of influent were given to the process models. As simulation results, the APID process which had the specific operation modes to use the organic matter in influent effectively showed higher efficiency of denitrification than the $A^2/O$ process. In the case of effluent TSS, the $A^2/O$ process that the retention time in reactors could be maintained stably was more effective than the APID process. In the cases of various disturbance condition, although it was identified that both two processes had similar effluent quality, the sludge production of the $A^2/O$ process showed lower than that of the APID process while the APID process showed higher energy efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김민한, 유창규(2008). 모델링 기법을 이용한 하수처리 공정 설계와 환경성 및 경제성 평가. 한국화학공학회지, 46(3), pp. 610-618.
  2. 안상우, 곽성근, 정영욱, 정무근, 박재우(2009). APID공정 내 공정진당을 위한 dynamic x-R 관리도의 적용. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 25(5), pp. 784-712.
  3. 윤영한, 안상우, 박재로, 고광백, 이효범, 지재성(2007). 선택적 간헐포기 및 유입위치변경에 따른 생물반응조 내 질소거동 및 성능평가. 한국수처리학회지, 15(2), pp. 25-34.
  4. 이성학(2006). 탈질 및 흡수 동시반응을 고려한 활성슬러지모델(ASM3) 최적화. 박사학위 논문, 부산대학교
  5. Copp, J. B. (ed.) (2002). The COST simulation benechmark: descriptiion and simulator manual, Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg.
  6. Hao, X., Loosdrecht, M. C. M. V., Meijer, S. C. F., and Qian, Y. (2001). Model-based evaluation of two BNR processes-UCT and A2N. Wat. Res., 35(12), pp. 2851-2860. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00596-0
  7. Karlsson, I. (1996). Environmental and energy efficiency of different sewage treatment processes. Wat. Sci. Tech., 34(34), pp. 203-211.
  8. Kim, H., Kim, Y., eha, J., Min, K., Gee, J., and Kim, C. (2009). Model-based evaluation of control strategies for phosphorus removal in a full-scale advanced phase isolation ditch process. Wat. Sci. Tech., 60(4), pp. 879-888. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.426
  9. Odegaard, H. and Skrovesth. A. F. (1997). An evaluation of performance and process stability of different processes for small wastewater treatment plants. Wat, Sci. Tech., 35(6), pp. 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00102-9
  10. Takacs, I., Patry. G. G., and Nolasco, D. (1991). A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process. Wat. Res., 25(10), pp. 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90066-Y
  11. Tam, H. L. S., Tang, D. T. W., Leung, W. Y., Ho, K. M., and Greenfield. P. F. (2004). Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes. Wat. Sci. Tech., 50(10), pp. 59-65.
  12. Vesllind, P. A. (ed.) (2003). Wastewater Treatment Plant Design, Water Environment Federation, USA.