References
- 교육부 (2007). 과학과 교육과정: 교육인적자원부고시 제 2007-79, 교육인적자원부.
- 장명덕, 정철, 정진우 (1999). 초등학생의 읽기 능력과 과학 탐구 능력 및 과학 성취도와의 관계, 한국지구과학회지, 29(2), 137-142.
- 장명덕, 홍상욱, 정진우 (2002). 중학교 2학년 과학영재들의 과학지식에 대한 과학철학적 관점과 이에 대한 토론 및 읽기 활동의 효과, 한국지구과학회지, 23(5), 397-405.
- 전화영, 여상인, 우규환 (2002). 과학자 읽기 자료의 도입이 과학자의 이미지와 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 효과, 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 22-31.
- 정철 (2002). 설명적 텍스트에 의한 중학생의 과학지식 이해에서 인지적 흥미와 읽기 동기의 영향, 자연과학지, 19(1), 109-127.
- 한안지, 이해순 (2001). 과학학습과 읽기자료 활용의 효과, 과학교육논총(인천교육대학교 과학교육연구소), 13, 159-178.
- 홍상욱, 임은경, 장명덕, 정진우 (2004). 해석적인 서술방식으로 구성된 과학 읽기 자료가 고등학생의 과학철학적 관점에 미치는 영향, 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 234-240.
- Alexander, P.A., & Kulikowich, J.M. (1991). Domain-specific and strategic knowledge as predictors of expository text comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547735
- Alexander, P.A., & Kulikowich, J.M. (1994). Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 895-911. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310906
- Alverman, D.E., & Hynd, C.R. (1989). effects of prior knowledge activation models and text structure on nonscience major's comprehension of physics. Journal of Educational research, 83, 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1989.10885937
- Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Sinatra, G.M., & Loxterman, J.A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspectives: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(3), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/747763
- Bulman, L. (1985). Teaching language and study skills in secondary science. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
- Byrne, M., Johnston, A.H., & Pope, A. (1994). Reasoning in science: a language problem revealed? School Science Review, 75(272), 103-107.
- Cassels, J.R.T., & Johnstone, A.H. (1985). Words that matter in science, A Report of a Research Exercise. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
- Chambers, S.K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
- Chambliss, M.J. (2002). The characteristics of well-designed science textbooks. In J. Otero, J.A. Leon, A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 51-72). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Chen, C. (1974). How Do Scientists Meet Their Information Needs? Special Libraries, 65(7), 272-80.
- Chiappetta, E.L., Sethna, G.H, & Fillman, D.A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 787-797. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300714
- Clark, J.M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
- Cook, L.K., & Mayer, R.E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.448
- Davis, F., & Greene, T. (1984). Reading for Learning in the Sciences. Edin역호: Oliver and Boyd.
- Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J.H. (1988b). Novice rules for assessing importance on scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 288-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90056-3
- Dee-Lucas, D., Larkin, J.H. (1986). Novice strategies for processing scientific texts. Discourse Processes, 9, 329-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538609544646
- Driver, R., Newton, P., Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Freebody, P., & Anderson, R.C. (1983). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 277-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/747389
- Gardner, P.L. (1977). Logical connectives in science - a summary of the findings. Research in Science Education, 7, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02643108
- Garner, R., Alexnader, P.A., Gillinggham, M.G., Kulikowich, J.M., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 643-659. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003643
- Garner, R., Gillingham, M.G., & White, C.S. (1989). Effects of "seductive details"on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
- Gaskins, I.W., Guthrie, J.T., Satlow, E., Ostertag, J., Six, L., Byrne, J., & Connor, B. (1994). Integrating instruction of science, reading, and writing: Golas, teacher development, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 31(9), 1039-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310914
- Glynn, S.M., Muth, K.D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1057-1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310915
- Graesser, A.C., Godron, S.E., & Brainerd, L.E. (1992). Quest: A model of question answering. Computers and Mathematics With Applications, 23, 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(92)90132-2
- Graesser, A.C., Leon, J.A., & Oteron, J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. Otero, Leon, J.A., & A.C. Gresser (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 1-18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V., & Gamas, W.S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative metaanalysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117-155.
- Hallyday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2005). Fundamentals of Physics (7th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Hanson, C.W. (1964). Research on users' needs: where is it getting us? ASLIB Proceedings, 64-79.
- Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/748011
- Harms, N.C., & Yager, R.E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association, No. 471-14776.
- Harp, S.F., & Mayer, R.E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational psychology, 89, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92
- Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. (New York: The Free Press)
- Henderson, J., & Wellington, J. (1998). Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching science. School Science Review, 79(288), 35-46.
- Holcomb, P.J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J.E., & West, W.C. (1999). Dual-coding, contextavailability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25, 721-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.721
- Hynd, C.R., McWhorter, J.Y., Phares, V.L., & Suttles, C.W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 933-946. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310908
- Jeong, Hyun Suk, & Park, Jongwon. (unpublished). Guideline and recommendations for the effective use of an everyday context in teaching physics.
- Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1037
- Koch, A., & Eckstein, S.G. (1995). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students' question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 473-485.
- Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
- Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., & Kealy, W.A. (1993). How geographic maps increase recall of instructional text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 47-62.
- Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes (edited by J. Worrall & G. Currie). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Lemke. J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in science text. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (pp. 87-113). NY: Routledge.
- Lunzer, E., & Gardner,K. (1979). The Effective Use of Reading. London: Heinemann Educational Books for the School Council.
- Marshall, S., Gilmour, M., & Lewis, D. (1991). Words that matter in science and technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 91(9), 5-12.
- Mayer, R.E. (1985). Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problemsolving performance? Part I. In B.K. Britton & J.B. Black (Eds.), Understanding Expository Text (pp. 65-87). Hissdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- McKeown, M.G., Beck, I.L., Sinatra, G.M., Loxterman, J.A. (1992). The contributions of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 79-93.
- McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Butler Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, backgound knowledge and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
- Meyer, B.J.F., Freedle, R.O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational research Journal, 21, 121-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021001121
- Meyerson, M.J., Ford, M.S., & Ward, M.A. (1991). Science vocabulary knowledge of third and fifth grad students. Science Education, 75(4), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750404
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
- Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
- Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept MapsTM as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Osborne, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Park, Jongwon, and Han, Sooja. (2002). Deductive reasoning to promote the change of concept about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074026
- Park, Jonwon & Lee, Imook (2004) Analyzing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1577-1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230767
- Sadoki, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1329-1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Sadoki, M., Goetz, E.T., & Fritz, J.B. (1993). Impact of concreteness, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.291
- Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary - Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review 14(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013136727916
- Sadoki, M., Goetz, E.T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85
- Song, Jinwoong, Park, Jongwon, Kwon, Sunggi, & Chung, Byunghoon. (2001). Idealization in Physics: Its types, roles and implications to physics learning. In Pinto, R., & Surinach, S. (Eds.), Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000. (pp. 359-366). Paris: Elsevier.
- Spiegel, G.F., Jr., Barufaldi, J.P. (1994). The effects of a combination of text structure awareness and graphic postorganizers on recall and retention of science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 913-932. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310907
- STAO (The Science Teachers'Association of Ontario) (2007). Literacy Through Science and Technology (K-8) and Science (9-12). Retrieved in http://www.stao.org/resources/positionstatements/ Literacy%20Through%20Science%2 0and%20Technology.pdf
- Verdi, M.P., Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Rittschof, K.A., & Johnson, R.J. (1996). Text learning using scientific diagrams:implications for classroom use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0033
- Walker, J. (1989). Getting them unstuck: some strategies for the teaching of reading in science. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 130-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1989.tb11900.x
- Wallace, C.S. (2004a). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: authenticity, multiple discourses, and the "third space". Science Education, 88, 901-914. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20024
- Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(91)90031-F
- Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Philadelphia: Ophn University Press.
- Woodward, A., & Elliot, D.L. (1990). Textbook use and teacher professionalism. In D.L. Elliot & Woodward, (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp. 178-219). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Yager, R.E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200610
- Yore, L.D., Craig, M.T., & Maguire, T.O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification and grades 4-8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199801)35:1<27::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
- Yore, L.D., & Shymansky, J.A. (1991). Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02962849
Cited by
- 지구과학 논문의 언어 특성 이해: 레지스터 분석 vol.31, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2010.31.7.785
- 중학교 과학 교과서 물리 단원에 수록된 과학 전문 용어 조사 vol.31, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2011.31.8.1175
- Reading Strategies of Elementary Science Textbook vol.61, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..61.201703.33
- 2009 개정 과학교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서의 읽기자료 분석 vol.36, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.2.129