DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of Prostate Phantom Volume Using Three-Dimensional Medical Imaging Modalities

3차원 의료영상진단기기를 이용한 가상 전립선 용적 측정

  • Seoung, Youl-Hun (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University) ;
  • Joo, Yong-Hyun (Dept. of Radiology, The Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Choe, Bo-Young (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University)
  • 성열훈 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 의공학교실 생체의공학연구소) ;
  • 주용현 (분당서울대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최보영 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 의공학교실 생체의공학연구소)
  • Received : 2010.02.22
  • Accepted : 2010.07.20
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Recently, advance on various modalities of diagnosing, prostate volume estimation became possible not only by the existing two-dimension medical images data but also by the three-dimensional medical images data. In this study, magnetic resonance image (MRI), computer tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) were employed to evaluate prostate phantom volume measurements for estimation, comparison and analysis. For the prostate phantoms aimed at estimating the volume, total of 17 models were developed by using devils-tongue jelly and changing each of the 5ml of capacity from 20ml to 100ml. For the volume estimation through 2D US, the calculation of the diameter with C9-5Mhz transducer was conducted by ellipsoid formula. For the volume estimation through 3D US, the Qlab software (Philips Medical) was used to calculate the volume data estimated by 3D9-3Mhz transducer. Moreover, the images by 16 channels CT and 1.5 Tesla MRI were added by the method of continuous cross-section addition and each of imaginary prostate model's volume was yielded. In the statistical analysis for comparing the availability of volume estimation, the correlation coefficient (r) was more than 0.9 for all indicating that there were highly correlated, and there were not statistically significant difference between each of the correlation coefficient (p=0.001). Therefore, the estimation of prostate phantom volume using three-dimensional modalities of diagnosing was quite closed to the actual estimation.

Keywords

References

  1. P.J. Littrup, R.A. Kane, C.R. Williams, T.K Egglin, F. Lee, S. Torp-Pedersen, and P.A. Church, "Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part I. Comparion with prostate-specific antigen assays," Radiology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp.537-542, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.2.1702894
  2. W.H. Cooner, B.R Mosley, C.L. Rutherford Jr, J.H. Beard, H.S. Pond, R.B. Bass Jr, and W.J. Terry, "Clinical application of transrectal ultrasonography and prostate-specific antigen in the search for prostate cancer," J. Urology, vol. 139, no. 4, pp.758-761, 1998.
  3. J.T. Isaac, D.S. Coffey, "Etiology and disease process of benign prostatic hyperplasia," Prostate, vol. 2, pp.33-50, 1989.
  4. S.J. Berry, D.S. Coffey, P.C. Walsh, and L.L. Ewing, "The development of human benign prostate hyperplasia with age," J. Urology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp.474-479, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)49698-4
  5. J. Freedland, J. Moul, "Prostate specific antigen recurrence after definitive therapy," J. Urology. vol. 177, no. 6, pp.1985-1991, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.137
  6. C.G.. Roehrborn, C.J. Girman, T. Rhodes, K.A. Hanson, G..N. Collins, S.M. Sech, S.J. Jacobsen, W.M. Garraway, and M.M. Lieber, "Correlation between prostate size estimated by digital rectal examination and measured by transrectal ultrasound," Urology. vol. 49, no. 4, pp.548-557, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00031-9
  7. C.M. Sehgal, G.A. Broderick, R. Whittington, R.J. Groniak, and P.H. Arger, "Three-dimensional US and volumetric assessment of the prostate," Radiology, vol. 192, pp. 274-278, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.192.1.8208953
  8. J.H. Byun, K.S. Cho, C.H. Sohn, S.T. Kim, G.G. Gong, and H.J. Ahn, "Endorectal MRI of Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Findings on Radical Prostatectomy," Korea J. Radiology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp.947-951, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1999.40.5.947
  9. M. al-Rimawi, D.J. Griffiths, R.C. Boake, D.R. Mador, and M.A. Johnson, "Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostatic volume," Br. J. Urology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp.596-600, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb09190.x
  10. J. Sosna, N.M. Rofsky, S.M. Gaston, W.C. DeWolf, and R.E. Lenkinski, "Determination of prostate volume at 3-Tesla using an external phased array coil: comparison to pathologic specimens," Acad. Radiol. vol. 10, no. 8, pp.846-853, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00015-1
  11. H. Hu, H.D. He, W.D. Foley, and S.H. Fox, "Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed," Radiology, vol. 215, no. 1, pp.55-62, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap3755
  12. C. Kayaalp, K. Arda, A. Oto, and M. Oran, "Liver volume measurement by spiral CT: an in vitro study," Clin. Imaging, vol. 26, no. 2, pp.122-124, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00376-X
  13. M.M. Rehani, M. Berry, "Radiation doses in computed tomography," Br. Med. J, vol 320, pp.593-594, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7235.593
  14. J.O. Salo, L. Kivisaari, S. Rannikko, and T. Lehtonen, "Computerized tomography and transrectal ultrasound in the assessment of local extension of prostatic carcinoma before radical retropublic prostatectomy," J. Urology, vol. 137, pp.435-438, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)44059-6
  15. C.H. Bangma, A.Q. Niemer, D.E. Grobbee, and F.H. Schroder, "Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparision of different methods," Prostate. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp.107-110, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199602)28:2<107::AID-PROS5>3.0.CO;2-D
  16. W.F. Dähnet, "Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening," Radiology. vol. 183, pp.625-626, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584907
  17. H.C. Kim, D.M. Tang, S.H. Lee, and Y.D. Cho, "Usefulness of renal volume measurements obtained by a 3-dimentional sonographic transducer with matrix electronic arrays," AIUM. J. Ultrasound, vol 27, pp.1673-1681, 2008. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.12.1673
  18. E.C. Kwon, "Introduction of 3D Ultrasound System and Clinical Usefulness of 3D Ultrasound Image," J. KIISE, vol. 23, no. 10, pp.38-48, 2005.
  19. S.H. Kim, S.H. Kim, "Correlations between the various method of estimation prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US," Korea J. Radiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp.134-139, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.2.134
  20. J.Y. Cho, H.J. Lee, S.H. Kim, S.H. Kim, "Comparison of Methods of Volume Measurement of the Prostate by Transrectal Ultrasound: Experiment with Jelly Models," J. Korean Soc. Med. Ultrasound, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.23-30, 2002. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2002.21.1.23
  21. M.K. Terris, T.A. Stamey, "Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound," J. Urology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp.984-987, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38508-7
  22. C.A. Mochtar, L.A.L.M. Kiemeney, M.M. van Riemsdijk, G.S. Barnett, M.P. Laguna, F.M.J. Debruyne, and J.J.M.C.H. de Larosette, "Prostate-specific antigen as an estimator of prostate volume in the management of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia," Eur. Urology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp.695-700, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00384-1
  23. C.G. Roehrborn, P. Boyle, A.L. Gould, J. Waldstreicher, "Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia," Urology, vol. 53, no 3, pp.581-589, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00655-4
  24. C.W. Jeong, H.J. Lee, and S.E. Lee, "Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the real prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy," Korea J. Urology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp.579-585, 2005.