DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pan 증발량 추세분포 분석

Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Pan Evaporation Trends

  • 임창수 (경기대학교 토목공학과)
  • 투고 : 2009.05.29
  • 심사 : 2009.09.06
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

본 연구에서는 pan 증발량 분포와 추세를 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 전국 56개 기후관측지점에서 1973년부터 1990년까지 의 pan 증발량 자료를 수집하여 분석을 실시하였다. 분석을 위하여 계절적 영향을 고려하여 1월, 4월, 7월 그리고 10월의 월평균 일별과 연평균 일별 pan 증발량 추세를 분석하였다. 연구결과 연평균 일별 pan 증발량은 56개 연구지역 중에서 38개 연구지역에서 감소추세를 보이고 있고, 1월 평균 일별 pan 증발량의 경우 33개 연구지역에서 pan 증발량 감소추세를 보이고 있다. 4월의 경우 38개 지역에서 증가추세를 보이고, 7월의 경우 47개 지역에서 감소추세를 보여서, 전반적으로 감소추세를 보이고 있다. 10월의 경우 35개 지역에서 증가추세를 보여서 전반적으로 증가추세를 보이고 있다. 따라서 전반적으로 연별과 1월, 7월은 pan 증발량이 감소추세를 보이고, 4월과 10월은 증가추세를 보이고 있다. 또한 인근에 위치한 권역별로도 다른 추세를 보이는 것으로 나타나서 지리지형적 요인이 pan 증발량 추세에 영향을 미치는 것으로 판단된다. 11개 기후관측지점에서 1973년부터 2006년까지의 pan 증발량 자료와 기후요소자료를 수집하여 추세분석을 실시한 결과, 기온, 상대습도 그리고 풍속추세는 연별이나 월별 pan 증발량 추세와 서로 같거나 또는 상이한 경향을 보이나, 일사량 추세는 연 및 월별 모두에서 pan 증발량 추세와 동일한 경향을 보이고, 강수량 추세는 연 및 월별 모두에서 pan 증발량 추세와 상반된 경향을 보였다.

The spatial distribution of pan evaporation and pan evaporation trends have been studied. In this study, pan evaporation data from 1973 to 1990 for 56 climatological stations were analyzed. In addition to annual average daily pan evaporation, monthly average daily pan evaporation in April, July, October and January were analyzed, considering seasonal effect. The study results indicate that in case of annual average daily pan evaporation, 38 stations out of 56 stations show decreasing trend. In case of average daily pan evaporation in January, 33 stations show decreasing trend. In April, 38 stations show increasing trend. In July, 47 stations show decreasing trend. In October, 35 stations show increasing trend. Therefore, on the whole, pan evaporation tended to decrease in January, July, and annual basis. On the other hand, pan evaporation tended to increase in April and October. Furthermore, pan evaporation trend in each individual region shows also different trend even though the region is located nearby, indicating that there are geographical and topographical effects on pan evaporation trend. Pan evaporation data and climatic data from 1973 to 2006 for 11 climatological stations were used for trend analysis. Climatic variables such as temperature, relative humidity and wind speed show same or opposite trend direction compared with pan evaporation in annual or monthly basis. Annual and monthly solar radiation trends show the same direction compared with pan evaporation; however, annual and monthly precipitation trends show the opposite direction compared with pan evaporation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brutsaert, W. and Parange, M.B. (1998) Hydrological cycle explains the evaporation paradox. Nature, Vol. 396, pp. 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/23845
  2. Chattopadhyay, N. and Hulme, M. (1997) Evaporation and potential evapotranspiration in India under conditions of recent and future climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 87, pp. 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00006-3
  3. Cohen, S., Ianetz, A., and Stanhill, G. (2002) Evaporative climate changes at Bet Dagan, Israel, 1964-1998. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 111, pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00016-3
  4. Da Silva, V.P.R. (2004) On climate variability in northeast of brazil. Journal of Arid Environments, Vol. 58, pp. 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2003.12.002
  5. Golubev, Y.S., Lawrimore, J.H., Groisman, P.Y., Speranskaya, N.A., Zhuravin, S.A., Menne, M.J., Peterson, T.C., and Malone, R.M (2001) Evaporation changes over the contiguous United States and the former USSR: A reassessment. Geophys. Res. Lett. Vol. 28, pp. 2665-2668. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012851
  6. Hobbins, M.T., Ramirez, J.A., and Brown, T.C. (2004) Trends in pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.: Paradoxical or complimentary? Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, pp. 1-5.
  7. IPCC (2001) Climate Change: Working Group 1, The Scientific Basis.
  8. Jauregui, E. and Luyando, E. (1998) Long-term association between pan evaporation and the urban heat island in Mexico City. Atmosfera, Vol. 11, pp. 45-60.
  9. Lawrimore, J.H. and Peterson, T.C. (2000) Pan evaporation trends in dry and humid regions of United States. J. Hydrometeorol., Vol. 1, pp. 543-546. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0543:PETIDA>2.0.CO;2
  10. Liu, B., Xu, M., Henderson, M., and Gong, W. (2004) A spatial analysis of pan evaporation trends in China, 1955-2000. J. of Geophysical Research, Vol. 109, No. D15: D15102, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004511.
  11. Moonen, A.C., Ercoli, L., Mariotti, M., and Masoni, A. (2002) Climate change in Italy indicated by agrometeorological indices over 122 years. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 111, pp. 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00012-6
  12. Peterson, T.C., Golubev, V.S., and Groisman, P.Y. (1995) Evaporation losing its strength. Nature, Vol. 377, pp. 687-688.
  13. Quintana-Gomes, R. (1997) Changes in evaporatiom patterns detected in northernmost south America. homogeneity testing. ln Proc. 7th International Meeting on Statistical Climatology. Whister, BC, Canada.
  14. Roderick, M.L. and Farquhar, G.D. (2002) The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. Science, Vol. 298, pp. 1410-1411.
  15. Roderick, M.L. and Farquhar, G.D. (2004) Changes in Australian pan evaporation from 1970 to 2002. Int. J. Climatol., Vol. 24, pp. 1077-1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1061
  16. Roderick, M.L. and Farquhar, GD. (2005) Changes in New Zealand pan evaporation since the 1970s. Int. J. Climatol., Vol. 25, pp. 2031-2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1262
  17. Sen, P.K. (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, pp. 1379-1389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285891
  18. Wang, Y., Jiang, T., Bothe, O., and Fraedrich, K. (2007) Changes of pan evaporation and reference evapotranspiration in the Yangtze River basin. Theor. Appl. Climatol., Vol. 90, pp. 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-006-0276-y