Serial Ultrasonographic Appearance of the Ovarian Structures during Proestrus, Estrus and Early Diestrus in Miniature Schnauzer Bitches

Miniature Schnauzer 암캐의 발정 전기, 발정기, 발정 후기 초반 동안 난소 구조물의 연속적 초음파상

  • Kim, Hee-Su (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Chul-Ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Mun, Byeong-Gwon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Bang-Sil (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Hwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, In-Chul (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Taek (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Suh, Guk-Hyun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Ki-Seok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Son, Chang-Ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Serial ultrasonography was conducted on Miniature Schnauzer bitches, on purpose to observe the ultrasonographic appearance of normal ovaries and ovarian structures during the estrous cycle. The size of ovaries was increased from $76.8{\pm}7.5mm^2(Mean{\pm}S.D)$ on Day-12 (Day-0=ovulation day) to $114.4{\pm}5.5mm^2$ on Day-8 and there was no significantly different between both ovaries. The ovaries were recognized by its proximity to the caudal renal pole and appeared moderately echogenic oval shape with a smooth contour. The size of follicles was increased from $8.1{\pm}4.5mm^2$ on Day-12 to $114.4{\pm}5.5mm^2$ on Day-0 and there was no significantly different between both ovaries. The number of follicles was increased from $2.8{\pm}0.7$ on Day-12 to $1.1{\pm}0.1$ on Day-0 and there was no significantly different between both ovaries. The follicles were small anechoic fluid-filled structures in early of proestrus, more increased, and indistinguished from each follicles in late of proestrus. The size of corpora lutea was increased from $19.3{\pm}2.1mm^2$ on Day-0 to $26.4{\pm}8.1mm^2$ on Day-8 and there was no significantly different between both ovaries. The number of corpora lutea was increased from $1.4{\pm}0.6$ on Day-0 to $2.9{\pm}0.4$ on Day-38 and there was no significantly different between both ovaries. The corpora lutea were small anechoic cavity and thin hyperechoic wall in early of diestrus, became more hyperechoic, and increased homogenous structures. The results of this study would be useful for differential diagnosis between normal and abnormal structures of ovaries.

Keywords

References

  1. Abel JH, Verhage HC, McClellan MC and Niswender GN. 1975. Ultrastructural analysis of the granulosaluteal cell transition in the ovary of the dog. Cell. Tissue. Res. 160:155-176
  2. Concannon PW and Lein DH. Current Veterinary Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1989:1269-1282
  3. Concannon PW, Hansel W and Visek WJ 1975. The ovarian cycle of the bitch: plasma estrogen, LH, progesterone. Biol. Reprod. 7:604-613 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod13.1.112
  4. England GC and Allen WE. 1990. Studies of canine pregnancy using B-mode ultrasound: Diagnosis of early pregnancy and the number of conceptuses. J. Small. Anim. Pract. 31:321-323 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1990.tb00819.x
  5. England GC and Yeager AE. 1993. Ultrasonographic appearance of the ovary and uterus of the bitch during oestrus, ovulation and early pregnancy. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 47:107-117
  6. England GC, Yeager AE and Concannon PW. 2003. Ultrasound imaging of the reproduction tract of the bitch. In: Recent Advances on Small Animal Reproduction, ed. Linde-forsberg C. Jul: 21
  7. Hayer P, Gunzel-Apel AR, Luerssen D, Hoppen HO. 1993. Ultrasonographic monitoring of follicular development, ovu-lation and the early luteal phase in the bitch. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 47:93-100
  8. Marseloo N, Fontbonne A, Bassu G, Riviere S, Leblanc B, Rault D, Biourge V and Chastant-Maillard S. 2004. Comparison of ovarian ultrasonography with hormonal parameters for determination of the time of ovulation in bitches. Proc 5th Int Symp Canine Feline Reprod. 75-77
  9. Miles K. 1995. Imaging pregnant dogs and cats. Compend. Contino Educ. Pract. Vet. 17:1217-1226
  10. Nautrup CP and Tobias R. 2000. An Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Ultrasonography of the Dog and Cat. London: manson. 248-259
  11. Penninck D and d'Anjou MA. 2008. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. Oxford: Blackwell. 397-400
  12. Silva LDM, Onclin K and Verstegen JP. 1996. Assessment of ovarian changes around ovulation in bitches by ultrasono-graphy, laparoscopy and hormonal assays. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 37:313-320 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1996.tb01236.x
  13. Wallace SS, Mahaffey MB, Miller DM, Thompson FN and Chakraborty PK. 1992. Ultrasonographic appearance of the ovaries of dogs during the follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53:209-215
  14. 김정훈, 정경아, 강현구, 오기석, 박인철, 박상국, 한호재, 손창호. 2000. 진돗개에서 발정주기 동안 질세포상과 번식호르몬의 관계. 한국임상수의학회지 17:225-233