동북아 수역의 수산자원 보존관리 협력체제에 관한 연구

A Study on International Cooperation System for Fisheries Resources Conservation & Management in the Northeast Asia

  • 발행 : 2009.09.30

초록

This study is designed to propose the ways of the multilateral cooperation system for effective management of fisheries resources in the various overlapping zones established by bilateral fisheries agreements between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia as semi-enclosed sea. It is necessary to build multilateral fisheries cooperation between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia because conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks could not be guaranted effectively by the management of fisheries resources in the area where piled up the current-fishing-pattern zone, as white zone and the various grey zone as middle zone, and the interim measures zone of bilateral fisheries agreements between Korea, China and Japan are piled up. Fisheries management in Korea, China and Japan by the bilateral fisheries agreements in North East Asia is faced with difficulties manage fisheries resources. International relationship on fisheries is maintained by bilateral fisheries agreements based on UNCLOS. However fisheries resources are over-exploited and the recovery of the fisheries resources is very slow because proper conservation and management of transboundary fish stocks which article 63(1) of UNCLOS defines have not prepared yet. Thus close cooperation among the coastal States for a proper conservation and management of transboundary fish stocks is necessary. Since the transboundary fish migrate within the EEZs of two or more coastal States, there is a need to manage the fish stocks in the region between Korea, China and Japan through a multi-lateral mechanism at ccircumference area of the current-fishing-pattern zone as white zone. Coastal States must guarantee sustainable maintenance of transboundary fish stocks through the regional cooperation for a proper conservation & management because one coastal State alone could not guarantee conservation and management of fish stocks. Thus there is a need to build multilateral fisheries cooperation between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia. There are many successful instances including the Barents' sea for a proper conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks. The Barents' sea is one of the best research object to study the regional cooperation for a conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks in North East Asia. In conclusion, it is necessary to build a multilateral fisheries cooperation system between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia to conserve and manage transboundary fish stocks effectively. It seems desirable that the range of the area to conserve and manage fish stocks should may be any partial area in the current-fishing-pattern zone and interim measures zone between Korea and China, Jeju middle zone between Korea and Japan, interim measures zone of bilateral fisheries agreements between China and Japan.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lewis M. Alexander, "Regionalism and the Law of the Sea: The case of semi-enclosed sea," Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 2-2, 1974, pp. 155-157.
  2. 백봉홈.김영구.이석룡, “반폐쇄해 내에서 어업과 생물자원 보존에 관한 연안국 협력”, 국제법학회논총, 국제법학회, 제43권 제1호, 1998, pp. 116-118.
  3. 최정윤.최종화, “동북아지역 국제어업 협력체제의 구축과 운영방향”, 수산경영논집, 한국수산경영학회, 제30권 제2호, 1999, pp. 12-13.
  4. 김찬규.이영준, 국제법개설, 법문사, 1995, pp. 230-232.
  5. Robin R. Churchill, Alan V. Lowe, The Law of the Sea, Manchester University Press, 1983, p. 125.
  6. D. Freestone, R. Barnes, D. M. Ong, The Law of the Sea, Oxford University Press, 2006. p.234.
  7. Anastasia Strati, Maria Gavouneli and Nikolas Skourtos, Unresolved Issues and challenges to the Law of the Sea, Martinis Nijhoff Publishers, 2006, pp. 3-19.
  8. Ellen Hey, The Regime of the Exploration of Transboundary Marine Fisheries Resources, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989, pp. 61-63.
  9. Rainer Lagoni, "Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreement", American Journal of International Law, Vol.78. 1984, p. 349.
  10. 坂元茂樹, “新韓日漁業協定의 意味”, 서울국제법연구, 서울국제법연구원, 제6권 제1호, 1999, pp. 45-65.
  11. 정명생 외, “한.중.일 공동어업관리방안 연구”, 한국해양수산개발원, 2005, pp. 29-62.
  12. 박재영.최종호, “한.중 어업협정의 평가 및 향후 과제”, 수산경영논집, 한국수산경영학회, 제31권 제2호, 2000, p. 87.
  13. 조종희 외, “한.중.일 공동어업관리방안 연구II", 한국해양수산개발원, 2005, pp. 38,59-67, 81-100.
  14. 이상고, “신해양질서의 어업관리체계와 TAC 관리제도 도입에 관한 연구”, 수산경영논집, 한국수산경영학회, 제30권 제1호, 1999, pp. 41-42.
  15. 최종화, “한.중 어업협정에 관한 연구”, 해양수산부, 2002, p. 182.
  16. 박희권, 박찬호 역, 해양법과 동북아시아 협력을 위한 제언, 국제해양법학회, 2001, pp. 164-168.
  17. 片岡 千賀之 , “Japan's New Ocean Regime and It's Fisheries Management", 수산경영논집, 한국수산경영학회, 제33권 제1호, 2002, p. 129.
  18. 이석용, “국제법상 공해의 자유“, 국제법평론, 국제법학회, 통권 제14호, 2000, p. 136.
  19. 박기갑, “공해상 어로의 자유는 더 이상 존재하지 않는가”, 법학연구, 부산대학교 법학연구소, 제48권 1-1호, 2003, pp. 289-311.
  20. Robin R. Churchill, "Fisheries Issues in Maritime boundary delimitation" , Marine Policy, Vol.17-1, 1993, pp. 45-50, 467-483.
  21. 신영태 외, “우리나라 주변수역에 있어서 어업자원 공동관리 방안”, 해양수산부, 2001, pp. 77-78.
  22. 박재영, “동북아 신 어업협정체제 하에서의 어업협력방안에 관한 연구”, 부경대학교 박사학위논문, 2003, pp. 107-108.