Abstract
Further treatment facility using various filter materials was evaluated to treat effluent of constructed wetland. Further treatment facility was installed with 1m length in outlet of 3 constructed wetland (unplanted constructed; reed bed constructed wetland; cattail bed constructed wetland) using 3 filter materials (slag, activated carbon, oyster shell). Flow rate of three further treatment facility was 63 $m^3$/day (slag), 19 $m^3$/day (activated carbon), and 81 $m^3$/day (Oyster shell). COD removal rate of slag, activated carbon, and oyster shell was 6 %, 24 %, 1 %, and removal mass was 32 g/day, 30 g/day, and 5 g/day, respectively. All of further treatment facility was effective to removal organic materials. T-N and T-P removal rate of activated carbon was 24 % and 4 %, and slag and oyster shell was not effective to remove T-N and T-P. Overall, further treatment facility was effective to remove organic mater, constructed wetland combined with further treatment facility can remove nutrient and organic matters effectively.
본 연구는 인공습지 유출수를 추가처리하기 위해 다양한 재료를 이용한 추가처리시설의 적용가능성을 분석하였다. 석문담수호 유입부에 설치된 인공습지 중 무식재구, 갈대식재구, 부들식재구의 하단 배수로(폭 0.3m, 수심 0.35 m)에 각각 제강슬래그, 활성탄, 굴폐각을 이용해 1.0 m 길이로 추가처리시설을 설치하였으며, 각 후 처리시설별로 유입유량을 다르게 적용하였다(제강슬래그 63 $m^3$/day; 활성탄 19 $m^3$/day; 굴폐각 81 $m^3$/day). 제강슬래그, 활성탄, 굴폐각의 COD 처리율은 각각 6 %, 24 %, 1 %로 나타났으며, 제거량은 32, 30, 5 g/day로 나타나, 모든 추가처리시설에서 유기물제거에 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. T-N과 T-P의 제거효율은 활성탄에서 24 %와 4 %로 효과적이었으나, 제강슬래그 및 굴폐각에서는 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과로부터 추가처리시설을 상대적으로 영양물질제거에 효과적인 인공습지와 연계하여 운영할 경우 영양물질 및 유기물을 효과적으로 제거할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.
