Korean Journal of Child Studies (아동학회지)

Korean Association of Child Studies (한국아동학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Young Children's Dyad Collaboration Based on Their Cognitive and Social Ability on Task Performance

인지적.사회적 변인을 함께 고려한 또래 쌍 협력활동이 유아의 과제 수행력에 미치는 효과

  • Lee, Jeong-Hwa (Department of Early Childhood Education, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Eon (Department of Early Childhood Education, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2008.12.31
  • Accepted : 2009.01.16
  • Published : 2009.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the effects on task performance of dyad collaboration based on young children's cognitive and social ability. The 108 5-year-old subjects were assigned to a collaborative experimental group, a comparison group working individually in sorting, writing, and making a puzzle, or a control group. Data from before and after measurements on sorting and perspective taking tasks were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA. Results showed that (1) Children working in dyad collaboration obtained significantly more improvement in their performance on both tasks than those working individually. (2) Dyads composed of a child with high level social skill but low level intelligence and a child with low levels of both showed most improvement in performance on the perspective taking task.

Keywords

References

  1. 강경아(1999). 유아의 사회적 능력에 따른 또래간 요구전략, 요구의 결과 및 반응전략 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  2. 강연정(2002) 집단구성, 연령, 성별에 따른 유아의 사회적 조망수용능력에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문.
  3. 권혜진(2005). 또래쌍구성과 과체유형에 따른 유아의 상호작용과 문제해결력. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  4. 권혜진(2006). 대쌍협력 상황에서 나타난 유아의 사회적 상호작용과 과제 수행력. 이동학회지. 15(1), 1-15.
  5. 권혜진.이순형(2005). 동일연령쌍과 혼합연령쌍 유아의 또래 상호작용 유형 및 수준 비교. 아동학회지, 26(6), 217-236.
  6. 김민아 (1996). 협동학습이 유아의 분류개념 형성에 미치는 효과. 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  7. 김순정.김희진(2007). 유아의 사회적 능력에 따른 사회적 놀이의 연속적 변화 패턴. 아동학회지, 28(1), 17-35.
  8. 김애자(2002). 스캐폴딩 유형별 도덕교육활동이 유아의 조망수용능력 및 분배정의 추론에 미치는 영향. 영유아교육연구, 5, 65-83.
  9. 김종백.김호(2006). 또래 협력 상황에서 능력과 과제난이도에 따른 유아의 언어적 상호작용 분석. 얼린유아교육연구, 11(2), 31-48
  10. 김지영(2004). NCTM의 수학교육 내용기준에 근거한 유아수학능력 평가도구 개발. 원광대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  11. 나귀옥.김경희(2004). 유아수학교육이론과실제. 서울 : 학지사.
  12. 박정민(1999). 사회성 수준에 따른 집단 탐구수업과 전통적 수업이 초등학교 아동의 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  13. 박혜원(2001). 한국 웩슬러 유아지능검사의 간편형 개발. 아동학회지, 22(2), 1-13.
  14. 서미옥(2003). 대쌍협력 상황에서 나타난 유아의 사회적 상호작용과 과제수행력. 아동학회지, 24(3), 15-26
  15. 서미옥(2004). 한국판 취학 전 아동용 사회적 기술 척도(K-SSRS : 교사평정용, 부모평정용)의 타당화 연구. 유아교육연구, 24(2), 223-242.
  16. 서영선.엄정애(2006). 조형활동올 통한 협동학습에서 사회적 능력별 집단구성에 따른 또래 상호작용 분석. 아동학회지, 27(3), 207-223.
  17. 서재식(1996). 협동학습이 학습자의 사회성에 따라 학습태도 및 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  18. 신현옥(1996) 자신과 타인이해 활동이 유아의 자아개념, 조망수용 및 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  19. 양옥승.신현문(1995). 유아의 또래간 협동적 문제해결과정에서의 상호작용 패턴. 사회과학연구(덕성여자대학교 사회과학연구소), 1, 217-230.
  20. 이경미(1992). 유아의 인기도와 조망수용 능력과의 관계에 대한 연구 -지각조망, 인지조망, 감정조망 을 중심으로-. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  21. 이소은.조재현(2004). 대쌍협력 활동에서 단일연령쌍과 혼합연령쌍 유아의 인지수준 변화와 협상 전략. 인간발달연구, 11(1), 35-48.
  22. 이정화(2006). 유아의 능력수준 및 성에 따른 쌍 협동 학습이 과제 수행에 미치는 효과. 미래유아교육학회지, 13(3), 185-207.
  23. 이정화.박정언(2007). 유아의 쌍 구성조건에 따른 Scaffolding 유형과 과제수행력. 열린유아교육연구, 12(6), 311-335.
  24. 이정화.이경선(2007). 쌍 구성방법에 따른 협력활동에서의 또래 상호작용과 과제수행력. 미래유아교육학회지, 14(2), 181-208.
  25. 이희주(2000). 교사와 또래와의 상호작용에 따른 협력 활동에서의 또래 상호작용과 과제수행력. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  26. 임희준.최경숙.노태희(1999). 학습자의 성취 수준에 따른 협동학습과 개별학습의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 137-145.
  27. 전성연(2005). 개별화와 협동화 : 실천적 전개를 위한 통합의 논리. 교육방법연구, 17(2), 161-182.
  28. 정선희(2000). 협동학습이 유아의 분류개념 및 수개념 형성에 미치는 영향. 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  29. 정영혜(2006). 대쌍협력 상황에서 성별구성에 따른 유아의 사회적 상호작용과 블록과제 수행. 계명대학교 교육대학원 석사학윈논문.
  30. 정희용(2001). 또래 상호작용에서 연령, 성별, 수준에 따른 Scaffolding 유형 차이에 관한 연구. 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  31. 조현석(1997). CAI 개별학습과 협동학습이 아동의 자아효능감과 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  32. 최미숙.최기영(2006). 컴퓨터 활동에서의 사회적 능력 집단 구성과 유아간 사회적 상호작용. 교원교육, 22(3), 231-248.
  33. 최은주(2003). 성 구성 및 능력에 따른 쌍짓기 유형이 Scaffolding과 과제수행력에 미치는 영향. 신라대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  34. 최종욱(2007). 스캐폴더 집단 간 스캐폴딩의 빈도, 유형, 학습 효과의 차이 분석. 미래유아교육학회지, 14(2), 137-179.
  35. 최지선(2004). 초등학교 또래 아동간 스캐폴딩 과정의 근거이론적 연구. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사 학위논문.
  36. 홍용희(2000). 어린이들의 학습의 비계 설정-비고스키와 유아교육, 서울 : 창지사.
  37. Ames, G. F., & Murray, F. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894-897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.894
  38. Arterberry, M. E., Cain, K. M., & Chopko, S. A. (2007). Collaborative problem solving in five-year-old children : Evidence of social facilitation and social loafing. Educational Psychology, 27(5), 577-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701308755
  39. Azmitia M., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). Social influence on children's cognition : State of the art and future directions. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior(Vol.22, pp, 89-144). New York : Academic Press.
  40. Bearison, D., Magzamen, S., & Filardo, E. K. (1986). Socio-eognitive conflict and cognitive growth in young children. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 51-72.
  41. Blaye, A., Light, P., Joiner, R., & Sheldon, S. (1991). Collaboration as a facilitator or planning and problem solving on a computer-based task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00890.x
  42. Botvin, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1975). The efficacy of peer modeling and social conflict in the acquisition of conservation. Child Development, 46, 796-799. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128583
  43. CDL (2008). CDL's Social Skills And Peer Relationship. http://www.cdi.org/for_familie-s/-eommon_concerns/social_skills.htm.
  44. Chamber, S. M. (1995). Age, prior opinions, and peer interactions in opinion restructuring. Child Development, 66, 178-192. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131199
  45. Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches. In N. M. Webb(Ed), Peer interaction, problem-solving, and cognition : Multidisciplinary perspectilves(pp.9-19). New York: Pergamon Press.
  46. De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. O'donnell & A. King(Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrens Erlbaum Assoelates.
  47. DeVries, R. (1998). Piaget's social theory. Educational Research, 26(2), 4-17.
  48. Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1976). Social interaction and cognitive development: further evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6(2), 245-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420060207
  49. Duran, R. T., & Gauvain, M. (1993). The role of age versus expertise in peer collaboration during joint planning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1013
  50. Fair, C., Vandermass-Peeler, M., Beaudry, R., & Dew, J. (2005). 'Hearned how little kids think' : Thirdgraders' scaffolding of craft activities with preschoolers. Early Child Development and Care, 175(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000230438
  51. Faulkner, D. (1995). Play, self and the social world. In P. Barnes(Eds.), Personal, social and emotional development of children(pp.231-286). Oxford: Balckwell Publishers in association with The Open University.
  52. Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23411
  53. Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education : The cognitive value of peer interaction. In Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), Culture, communication and cognition : Vygotskian perspeccives(pp,323-347). United States of America : Cambridge University Press.
  54. Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem-solving and children's planning skills, Developmental Psychology, 25, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.1.139
  55. Golbeck, S. L. (1998). Peer collaboration and children' representation of the horizontal surface of liquid. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(4), 571-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)80056-2
  56. Graesser, A. D., Bowers, C., & Hacker, D. J. (1997). An anatomy of naturalistic tutoring. In K. Hogan, & M. Pressley(Eds.), Scaffolding student learning : Instructional approaches & issues(pp.145-184). Massachusetts : Brookline Books.
  57. Hudson, L. M., Forman, E. A., & Brion, M. S. (1995). Role taking as a predictor behavior in cross-age tutors. Child Development, 1320-1329.
  58. Johnson, D. W., Skon, S., & Johnson, R. T. (1980). Effect of cooperative competitive and individualistic conditions on children's problem-solving performance. American Educational Research Journal. 17, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017001083
  59. Lee, J. H., & Park, J. E. (2008, 3). Children's verbal interaction in collaborative learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  60. Levin, I., & Druyan, S. (1993). When sociocognitive transaction among peers fails : The case of misconceptions in science. Child Development, 64, 1571-1591. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131553
  61. Manion, V., & Alexander, J. M. (1997). The benefits of peer collaboration on strategy use, metacognitive causal attribution, and recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 268-289. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2409
  62. Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children's same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.431
  63. Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning : Evidence for collective reality. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394148
  64. Murray, F. B. (1983). Equilibration as cognitive conflict. Developmental Review, 3, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90007-2
  65. Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.
  66. Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals : Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 639-636. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.639
  67. Piaget, J. (1952). The moral judgement of the child. New York : Harcoun Brace.
  68. Piaget. J, (1959). The language and thought of the child. Cleveland : Meridian(Originally published in 1923).
  69. Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction : 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604
  70. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.) (1993). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washiington, DC : American Psychological Association.
  71. Rubin, K. H., & Barwick, D. (1984). Communicative skills and sociability. In H. E. Sypher, & J. L. Applegate(Eds.), Communication by children and adults, 5(pp.152-170). London : Sage Publications Inc.
  72. Russell, J., Mills, I., & Reiff-Musgrove, P. (1990). The role of symmetrical and asymmetrical social conflict in cognitive change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90049-E
  73. Samaha, N. V., & De Lisi, R (2000). Peer collaboration on a nonverbal reasoning task by urban minority students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600646
  74. Samaha, N. V., & De Lisi, R. (2003, April). Gender differences in peer collaboration on a spatial reasoning task by urban, minority student. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
  75. Schultz, S. (2000, April). Are four heads better than one? Effect of group-work on students' achievement in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  76. Shamir, A. (2003). Peer mediation with young children : An intervention program. In A. S. H. Seng, L. K. J. Pou, & O. S. Tan(Eds.), Mediated Learning Experience with Children(pp.85-97). Singapre : McGraw-Hill Education.
  77. Slavin, R. E., & Karweit N. L. (1984). Mathematics achievement effect of three levels of individualization : Whole class ability grouped and individualized instruction. Johns Hopkins University, Jan(ED 242 559).
  78. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.207
  79. Tudge, J., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura : Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277297
  80. Underwood, J., Underwood, G. & Wood, D. (2000). When does gender matter? Interaction during computer-based problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 10(5), 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00008-6
  81. Vaughn, B. E., Colvin T. N., Azria, M. R., Caya, L., & Knzysik, L. (2001). Dyadic analyses of friendship in a sample of preschool-age children attending head start : Correspondence between measures and implications for social competence. Child Development, 72(3), 862-878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00320
  82. Yygorsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
  83. Webb, N. M. (1977). Learning in individual and small-group settings. Technical Report No. &. California: Stanford University.
  84. Webb, N. M. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475
  85. Webb, N. M., & Cullian, L. K. (1983). Group interaction and achievement in small groups : Stability over time. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003411
  86. Wentzel, K. R. (1993) Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357
  87. Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Sociometric status and academic adjustment in middle school : A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239128
  88. Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77. 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.1.60