DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective statistical analysis of dental implants

치과 임플란트 환자의 통계 분석에 관한 후향적 연구

  • Zhao, Chun-Ri (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Moon, Eun-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 조춘일 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 문은수 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실)
  • Published : 2009.07.31

Abstract

Statement of problem: The number of edentulous patients is increasing due to an aging society, which leads to increased demands and interests on implant restorations. Implant restorations are an effective treatment method for both complete and partially edentulous patients, and the success rate has been reported to be high. But because of the increased use of implants in various situations have resulted in frequent reports of failures on implant restorations. Various efforts to overcome these failures have been made. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the statistic survival rate of dental implants on patients who were treated at Dankook University Dental Hospital during the past 10 years based on their charts. Materials and methods :The research was made for two different periods of time; The first investigation was for patients from August, 1998 to August, 2003 and the second was for patients from September, 2003 to April, 2007. Information on the number of implants placed, the location and distribution of implants, the duration between the first and second surgery, and the survival rate of implants were investigated from the patients'charts. Results: 1. According to the first investigation, 1680 implants were placed on 612 patients and the second investigation showed 2438 implants placed on 933 patients. Thus a total of 4118 implants on 1545 patients. 2. Among the 1545 patients, 884 patients were male (57.2 %) and 661 patients were female (42.8%). Out of 4118 implants, 1739 implants (42.2%) were placed on the maxilla, and 2379 implants (57.8%) on the mandible. Implants were placed most frequently in the posterior region of the mandible. A total of 2043 implants (53.2%) were placed in this region. 3. According to the first investigation, 57 out of 1680, implants failed, while from the second investigation, 17 out of 2438 implants were reported as failure. In total, 74 implants failed, which results in a 98.2% survival rate. 4. The average duration between the first and the second surgeries in maxillas decreased from 7.4 months to 6.8 months. The duration also decreased from 5.6 months to 5.0 months in mandibles. Conclusion: As shown in the results, the number of placed implants and the survival rate of implants were higher in the second investigation than that of the first investigation. And the time spent after the first surgery to the second surgery was less in the second investigation. Consequently, it can be presumed that the demand and consumption of dental implants as well as the survival rate will increase in the future.

연구목적: 전 세계적인 고령화 추세에 따라 무치악 환자들이 증가하고 이들의 임플란트 보철 수복에 대한 수요와 관심이 증가하고 있다. 부분 무치악 또는 완전 무치악에서 임플란트를 이용한 보철 치료는 효과적이며 그 성공율 또한 높게 보고되고 있다. 하지만 임플란트 사용 범위가 다양해짐에 따라 여러 가지 실패가 보고되고 이러한 실패를 줄이기 위한 방법들이 연구, 개발되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 임플란트 생존율을 조사하고, 이를 토대로 향후 임플란트의 생존율에 대해 예측하고자 한다. 연구 방법: 1998년 8월부터 2003년 8월까지, 2003년 9월부터 2007년 4월까지 두 차례로 나누어 진료기록부 조사를 통해 최근 10년 동안 단국대학교 치과병원에서 임플란트를 치료받은 환자들의 임플란트 생존율에 대해 조사하였다. 결과: 진료기록부 조사를 통해 식립된 임플란트의 수, 임플란트 위치 및 분포, 1차 수술 후부터 2차 수술까지의 기간, 생존율 등을 조사하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 1차 조사에서 612명 환자에게 1680개의 임플란트가 식립되고, 2차 조사에서는 933명 환자에게 2438개가 식립되어 총 1545명의 환자에게 4118개 임플란트가 식립되었다. 2. 총 1545명 환자의 성비는 남성이 57.2% (884명), 여성이 42.8% (661명)였고, 총 4118개 임플란트에서 상악에 1739개 (42.2%), 하악에 2379개 (57.8%)가 식립되었으며 하악 구치부에 2043개 (53.2%)가 식립되어 제일 높은 비율을 차지하였다. 3. 1차 조사에서는 총 1680개의 임플란트 중 57개가 실패하였고 2차 조사에서는 2438개의 임플란트 중 17개가 실패하여 총 4118개의 임플란트 중 74개가 실패 하여 98.2%의 생존율을 보였다. 4. 1차 수술 이후 2차 수술이 시행되기까지의 기간은 상악에서 평균 7.4개월에서 6.8개월로, 하악에서 평균 5.6개월에서 5.0개월로 2차 조사 기간에서 0.6개월 단축되었다. 결론: 이상의 결과로 볼 때 1차 조사에서보다 2차 조사시에 식립된 임플란트의 수 및 생존율이 증가하였고 1차수술 후부터 2차 수술 전까지 기간도 단축되고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 앞으로도 임플란트에 대한 관심과 수요가 계속 증가 할 것이고 그 성공율 또한 증가하리라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  2. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:641 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70048-4
  3. Rosenberg ES, Cho SC, Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Froum S, Evian CI. A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:873-9
  4. H$\ddot{a}$mmerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:226-31 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x
  5. Bahat O. Br$\aa$nemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-53
  6. Kim JS, Chang HH, Chang CH, Rhyu SH, Kang JH. Preprosthetic Stage Dental Implant Failure. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;27:178-83
  7. Drago CJ, O'Connor CG. A clinical report on the 18-month cumulative survival rates of implants and implant prostheses with an internal connection implant system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27:266-271
  8. Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:197-202
  9. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lind$\acute{e}$n U, Bergstr$\ddot{o}$m C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Br$\AA$nemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45
  10. Quirynen M, Listgarten MA. Distribution of bacterial morphotypes around natural teeth and titanium implants ad modum Br$\AA$nemark. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:8-12 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010102.x
  11. Nevins M, Langer B. The successful use of osseointegrated implants for the treatment of the recalcitrant periodontal patient. J Periodontol 1995;66:150-7 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.2.150
  12. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x

Cited by

  1. Structural equation modeling for association between patient satisfaction and quality of life after implant surgery vol.49, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.4.291
  2. Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses vol.29, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2013.29.4.317
  3. 치과내원자의 임플란트 시술경험이 지식과 태도에 미치는 영향 - 경남지역을 중심으로 - vol.5, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2011.5.2.053