DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sinking and fit of abutment of locking taper implant system

  • Moon, Seung-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Son, Mee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2009.07.31

초록

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Unlike screw-retention type, fixture-abutment retention in Locking taper connection depends on frictional force so it has possibility of abutment to sink. PURPOSE. In this study, Bicon$^{(R)}$ Implant System, one of the conical internal connection implant system, was used with applying loading force to the abutments connected to the fixture. Then the amount of sinking was measured. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 10 Bicon$^{(R)}$ implant fixtures were used. First, the abutment was connected to the fixture with finger force. Then it was tapped with a mallet for 3 times and loads of 20 kg corresponding to masticatory force using loading application instrument were applied successively. The abutment state, slightly connected to the fixture without pressure was considered as a reference length, and every new abutment length was measured after each load's step was added. The amount of abutment sinking (mm) was gained by subtracting the length of abutment-fixture under each loading condition from reference length. RESULTS. It was evident, that the amount of abutment sinking in Bicon$^{(R)}$ Implant System increased as loads were added. When loads of 20 kg were applied more than 5 - 7 times, sinking stopped at $0.45{\pm}0.09\;mm$. CONCLUSION. Even though locking taper connection type implant shows good adaption to occlusal force, it has potential for abutment sinking as loads are given. When locking taper connection type implant is used, satisfactory loads are recommended for precise abutment location.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94
  2. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  3. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1156.x
  4. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36
  5. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70197-0
  6. Albrektsson T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:75-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90355-1
  7. Keating K. Connecting abutments to Dental implants "An Engineers perspective". Irish Dentist 2001;43-6
  8. Chapman RJ, Grippo W. The locking taper attachment for implant abutments: use and reliability. Implant Dent 1996;5:257-61 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199600540-00004
  9. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8
  10. Robert G. Craig. Restorative Dental Materials, 6th ed: C.V. Mosby Co, 1980:60-2
  11. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. I. J Dent Res 1956;35:664-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350050201
  12. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. II. J Dent Res 1956;35:671-3 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350050301
  13. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:99-108
  14. Van Eijden TM. Three dimensional analysis of human biteforce magnitude and moment. Arch Oral Biol 1991;36;535-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(91)90148-N
  15. Lee HL, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Abutment sinking and fitness of conical internal connection implant system according to loading condition. J Korean Acad Stomatognathic Funct Occlusion 2008;24:77-89
  16. Dailey B, Jordan L, Blind O, Tavernier B. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:251-6

피인용 문헌

  1. Mechanical resistance of screwless morse taper and screw-retained implant-abutment connections vol.26, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12303
  2. study vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388
  3. Evaluating the Dynamic Behavior of Taper Joint Implants Under Different Loading Conditions:A Transient Dynamic Finite Element Analysis vol.12, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5466/ijoms.12.105