Redo CABG Using Various Arterial Grafts

다양한 동맥도관을 이용한 재관상동맥 우회술

  • Min, Ho-Ki (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Young-Tak (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Min-A (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Wook-Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Pyo-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Sung, Ki-Ick (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jun, Tae-Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Ji-Hyuk (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 민호기 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이영탁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이미나 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김욱성 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 박표원 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 성기익 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 전태국 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 양지혁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.08.05

Abstract

Background: Although the reports on re-operative coronary revascularization (redo-CABG) have increased, there are only limited reports on redo-CABG using arterial grafts. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and feasibility of using various arterial grafts for redo-CABG. Material and Method: A consecutive series of patients who underwent 33 redo-CABGs from March 2001 to July 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed conventional CABG in 17 patients, on-pump beating CABG in 7, off-pump CABG in 7 and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in 2. The grafted that were used included 34 internal thoracic arteries (ITA), 14 radial arteries, 14 right gastroepiploic arteries and others. Arterial composite grafts were constructed in 26 patients. Of these, a previously patent in-situ left ITA was re-used as the in-flow of a composite graft in 10 patients. Result: No hospital deaths or major wound problems occurred. The post-operative complications included 2 myocardial infarctions (6%), 1 intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (3%), 5 cases of atrial fibrillation (15.1 %) and 3 neurologic complications (9.1%). The meanfollow-up duration was 31.1$\pm$22.7 months and the 3 year survival rate was 86.4%. There were 4 late deaths (2 cardiac deaths) and no recurrent angina during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Redo-CABG with using various arterial grafts is currently a safe, feasible procedure, but further investigation and long term follow-up are needed.

배경: 동맥도관이 정맥도관에 비해 개통률이 우수하다고 알려져 있으나, 재관상동맥 우회술시 동맥도관의 이용은 제한적으로 보고되고 있다. 또한 일차 관상동맥 우회술에 비해 재관상동맥 우회술은 수술 위험도가 높은 것으로 알려져 있어 본 연구는 동맥도관을 이용한 재관상동맥 우회술의 안전성과 효용성을 평가하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 3월에서 2008년 7월까지 본원에서 동맥도관을 이용하여 시행한 33예의 재관상동맥 우회술에 대해 후향적으로 분석하였다. 수술 시 환자의 평균 연령은 62.6$\pm$9.0세(41$\sim$75)였고 25명(75.8%)은 남자였다. 첫 수술로부터 재수술까지의 평균 기간은 100.1$\pm$67.3개월이었고 수술 당시 평균 좌심실 구출률은 52$\pm$12.5%였다. 수술은 인공심폐기 보조하에서 24예(심정지액을 사용한 경우가 17예, 심박동하 7예)를 시행하였고 인공심폐기의 보조없이 심박동하에 시행한 관상동맥우회술은 7예, 최소침습적 관상동맥우회술은 2예였다. 사용된 도관은 내흉동맥(34예: 우측내흉동맥 28예, 좌측내흉동맥 6예), 요골동맥(14예), 우위대망동맥(14예), 복재정맥(4예) 등이었고, 목표 원위부는 좌전하행지가 23예, 사선분지가 10예, 둔각분지가 25예, 원위 우관상동맥이 4예, 후하행지가 16예, 후측분지가 8예, 중간지(ramus intermedius)가 5예였다. 26명의 환자에서 동맥 복합도관을 이용하여 수술하였고 이들 중 5예에서는 원위치 이식 도관(in situ)으로 좌측 내흉동맥을 혈액공급원으로 다른 동맥과 복합도관을 만들어 사용하였고 10예에서는 일차 관상동맥 우회술 시 사용되어진 좌측내흉동맥을 재이용하였다. 또한 5명에서는 원위치 이식 도관으로서 우측내흉동맥을 혈액공급원으로, 6명에서는 다양한 동맥 유리 도관(arterial free graft)으로 대동맥을 혈액공급원으로 하여 복합도관을 만들어 사용하였다. 평균 원위 문합수는 2.8$\pm$0.9였다. 결과: 수술 사망 및 주요 상처감염은 없었다. 평균 추적관찰 기간은 31.1$\pm$22.7개월이었고 4명은 추적관찰 중 사망하였다. 수술 후 합병증으로는 수술 후 심근 경색이 2예(6%), 대동맥내 풍선 펌프 삽입을 한 환자가 1예(3%), 심방세동이 5예(15.1%), 신경학적 합병증이 3예(9.1%) 있었다. 수술 후 3년 및 5년 누적 생존율(cumulative survival rate)은 각각 87.04%였다. 결론: 현재 심근 보호법과 수술 수기의 발달 및 경험 축적 등으로 인해 다양한 동맥도관을 이용한 재관상동맥 우회술은 비교적 안전하게 시행될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JS, Kim HG, Chang WI, Kim KB. Early and midterm results after redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;37:146-153
  2. Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Ivanov J. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120: 156-163 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.106983
  3. Mauro, MD, Iacò AL, Contini M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:81-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.058
  4. Sabik III JF, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Walts PA, Lytle BW. Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1719-1727 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.033
  5. Yamamuro M, Lytle BW, Sapp SK, Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, McCarthy PM. Risk factors and outcomes after coronary reoperation in 739 elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:464-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01076-0
  6. He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, He YH, Mack MJ. Operative mortality in reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:971-978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(05)80164-3
  7. Christenson JT, Schmuziger M, Simonet F. Reoperative coronary artery bypass procedures: risk factors for early mortality and late survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11:129-133 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(96)01030-5
  8. Ferrari ER, von Segesser LK. Arterial grafting for myocardial revascularization: how better is it? Curr Opin Cardiol 2006; 21:584-588
  9. Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, et al. Predictors of reoperation after myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:811-821
  10. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198601023140101
  11. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00620-6
  12. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:855-872 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70365-X
  13. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:990-998 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.110249
  14. Davierwala PM, Maganti M, Yau TM. Decreasing significance of left ventricular dysfunction and reoperative surgery in predicting coronary artery bypass grafting-associated mortality: a twelve-year study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126:1335-1344 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00936-X
  15. Gillinov AM, Casselma FP, Lytle BW, et al. Injury to a patent left internal thoracic artery graft at coronary reoperation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:382-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00009-0
  16. Elami A, Laks H, Merian G. Technique for reoperative median sternotomy in the presence of a patent internal mammary artery graft. J Card Surg 1994;9:123-127 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1994.tb00837.x
  17. Azoury FM, Gillinov AM, Lytle BW, Smedria NG, Sabik III JF. Off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting by thoracotomy: patient selection and operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1959-1963 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02617-0
  18. Subramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1648-1655 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01099-0
  19. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition and prevention. Circulation 1998;97:916-931 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916
  20. Marshall WG, Saffitz J, Kouchoukos NT. Management during reoperation of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts with minimal atherosclerosis by angiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:163-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60511-5
  21. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, et al. Vein graft disease: The clinical impact of stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103:831-840
  22. Mehta ID, Weinberg J, Jones MF, et al. Should angiographically disease-free saphenous vein grafts be replaced at the time of redo coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:17-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01192-2
  23. Navia D, Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, et al. Is the internal thoracic artery the conduit of choice to replace a stenotic vein graft? Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:40-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)90362-X
  24. Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:407-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00370-5
  25. Lim SH, Kwak YT, Lee S, et al. Clinical experiences of redo-CABG. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;35: 779-84