DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental Study on Transfer Length of Domestic CFRP Tendon

국내 CFRP 긴장재의 전달길이에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Jung, Woo-Tai (Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Structural Engineering & Bridges Research Division) ;
  • Park, Young-Hwan (Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Structural Engineering & Bridges Research Division)
  • 정우태 (한국건설기술연구원 구조교량연구실) ;
  • 박영환 (한국건설기술연구원 구조교량연구실)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

CFRP(carbon fiber reinforced polymer) tendons can be used as an alternative to solve the corrosion problem of steel tendons. Material properties of CFRP tendons such as bond strength, transfer length, and development length should be determined in order to apply to concrete structures. First of all, in case of application for pretension concrete members with CFRP tendons, transfer length is an important factor. A total of 9 beams have been cast to determine transfer length and development length of domestic CFRP tendon in this paper. Test results revealed that transfer length of the prestressing 25% and 50% are 34D, 55D respectively. Also, transfer length has increased as the prestressing force has increased. A change was observed in transfer length of developed CFRP tendon after 9 weeks. ${\alpha}_t$ of developed CFRP tendon was 2.3 similar to the steel strand.

CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer) 긴장재는 PC 강연선의 부식문제를 해결하기 위해 대안으로 사용될 수 있다. CFRP 긴장재를 콘크리트구조물에 적용하기 위해서는 부착강도, 전달길이, 정착길이와 같은 재료적 특성이 명확히 결정되어야 한다. 특히 프리텐션 콘크리트 부재에 CFRP 긴장재가 적용될 경우 전달길이는 긴장력 도입에 있어서 중요한 요소가 된다. 본 연구에서 개발된 CFRP 전달길이 및 정착길이를 산정하기 위해 프리텐션 보 9개를 제작하였다. 전달길이 실험결과, 긴장력 25%인 경우는 34D, 긴장력 50%인 경우는 55D로 측정되었고, 긴장력이 커지면 전달길이가 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 시간경과에 따른 전달길이 변화를 살펴보면, 긴장력의 크기에 따라 시간경과가 전달길이에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 보강재 특성계수 산정 결과, 본 연구에서 개발된 CFRP 긴장재의 보강재-특성 계수 ${\alpha}_t$는 2.3으로 PS강연선 (${\alpha}_t=2.4$)과 비슷한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부, “교량현황조서,” 국토해양부, 2008, 134 pp.
  2. 한국건설기술연구원, “FRP 긴장재 및 정착장치의 개발과 활용을 위한 연구,” 한국건설기술연구원, 2007, 435 pp.
  3. ACI Committee 440, Prestressing Concrete Structures with FRP Tendons (ACI 440.4R-04), ACI Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2004, 35 pp.
  4. 동명사, 프리스트레스트 콘크리트, 동명사, 1997, 208 pp.
  5. Mahmoud, Z. I., Rizkalla, S. H., and Zaghloul, E.-E R., “Transfer and Development Length of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Prestressing Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 96, No. 4, 1999, 602 pp.
  6. Abdelrahman, A. A. and Rizkalla, S. H., “Serviceability of Concrete Beams Prestressed by Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 94, No. 4, 1997, pp. 447-457
  7. Soudki, K. A., Lee, C., and Green, M. F., “Transfer Length of CFRP Rods in Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Prpceedings of 1st CSCE Structural Speciality Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, May 29-June 1, 1996, pp. 111-122
  8. 건설교통부, “도로교설계기준,” 건설교통부 2005, 345 pp.
  9. Patrick, X. and Zou, W., “Long-term Properties and Transfer Length of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers,” Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003. pp. 10-19 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(10)
  10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-05/318R-05),” ACI Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2005, 430 pp
  11. Gross, S. P. Yost, J. R. and Matthew V. D'ANGELO, “Tansfer Length of CFRP Rods in Pretensioned Concrete Beams,” FRPRCS-8 University of Patras, Patras, Greece, July 16-18, 2007, pp. 504-505
  12. Mahmoud, Z. I. and Rizkalla, S. H., “Bond of CFRP Prestressing Reinforcement,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures (ACMBS2), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1996, pp. 877-884
  13. Mahmoud, Z. I., Rizkalla, S. H., and Zaghloul, E., “Transfer and Development Length of CFRP Reinforcement,” Proceedings of the 1997 CSCE Annual Conference, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, 1997, pp. 101-110