Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지

POSTSEDATION EVENTS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS SEDATED FOR DENTAL TREATMENT

진정법을 이용한 치과 치료 시 소아 환자의 진정 후 반응에 대한 연구

  • Koo, Jung-Eun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Mok-Dong Medical Center, Ehwa Womans University School of Medicine) ;
  • Baek, Kwang-Woo (Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 구정은 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 목동병원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 백광우 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine twenty four hour postsedation events after discharge in children sedated for dental treatment. The sedation sheets of 355 children were selected. Selection criteria excluded no midazolam or nasal route of midazolam, no ASA class I, absent or incomplete questionnaire. Children received orally chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine, nitrous oxide was maintained during the sedation. Midazolam was injected to buccal submucosa with titration. Parents were interviewed via telephone within twenty four hours after sedation. Questionnaire included sleeping response, sleeping time, sleeping behavior, vomiting response at home. Two hundred twenty four (67.8%) children slept and twenty one(6.3%) children had abnormal sleeping behavior. One hundred four(31.0%) children had abnormal behavior after sleep and ten(3.0%) children had vomiting response. In the children took the higher dose of midazolam, there were the great tendency to sleep after discharge (p<0.05), the more negative response to sleeping behavior(p = 0.055), the longer sleeping time(p=0.054). In this study many children slept after sedation and a few children showed negative response. However there were not any considerable emergency events. Further study is required to determine the postsedation safety for the use of submucosal midazolam combination with chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine.

Chloral Hydrate와 hydroxyzine을 경구 복용한 후 midazolam을 협점막하로 추가 투여한 진정법은 진정 심도를 깊게 해주고 안정적인 진정 상태를 유지해 준다고 보고된다. 진정 중 나타나는 반응에 대한 연구는 활발하나 퇴원 기준에 따라 환자를 귀가시킨 후 나타나는 반응에 대한 연구는 아직 부족하다. 이 연구에서는 진정법을 이용하여 치과 치료를 받은 소아 환자의 진정 후 행동 반응 및 부작용에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 이화여자대학교 목동병원 소아치과에 2005년 4월부터 2007년 12월까지 내원하여 진정법으로 치료받은 환아를 대상으로 귀가 후 24시간 이내에 전화를 이용하여 설문 조사하였다. 조사 항목은 진정 후수면 유무, 진정 후 수면 시간, 진정 후 수면 행동, 수면에서 회복 후 행동, 진정 후 구토 유무이다. 귀가 후 227명(57.8%)이 잠을 잤고 21명(6.3%)이 비정상적인 수면 행동을 보였다. 104명(31.0%)이 수면에서 회복 후 비정상적인 행동을 하였고, 10명(3.0%)이 구토 반응을 보였다. Midazolam 용량이 많으면 진정 후 잠을 잘 가능성이 크고(p<0.05), 괴로워 하면서 자거나 자다깨다를 반복할 수 있으며(p=0.055) 수면 시간도 길어질 수 있다(p=0.054). 이번 조사에서는 진정 후 수면이 많았고, 비정상적인 행동 및 구토 반응도 있었으나 우려할 만한 응급상황은 나타나지 않았다. Midazolam의 협점막하 병용 투여는 안전한 진정법으로 보이며 장기적 연구, 전향적 연구 등이 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barr ES, Wynn RL, Spedding RH : Oral premedication for the problem child placebo and chloral hydrate. J Pedod, 1:272-280, 1977.
  2. Carr KR, Wilson S, Nimer S, et al. : Behavior management techniques among pediatric dentists prac­tieing in the southeastern United States. Pediatr Dent, 21:347-353, 1999.
  3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry : Guideline on the elective use of minimal, moderate, and deep sedation and general anesthesia for pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent, 27:110-118, 2005.
  4. Wilson S, Farrell K, Griffen A, et al. : Conscious sedation experiences in graduate pediatric dentistry programs. Pediatr Dent, 23:307-314, 2001.
  5. Wilson S, McTigue DJ : Survey of conscious sedation practices in pediatric dentistry advanced residency programs. J Dent Educ, 53:595-597, 1989.
  6. 안소연, 최병재, 곽지윤 등 : 어린이의 치과치료시 약물에 의한 진정요법 사용에 대한 실태조사. 대한소아치과학회지, 32:444-453, 2005.
  7. Davis MJ : Conscious sedation practices in pediatric dentistry: a survey of members of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry College of Diplomates. Pediatr Dent, 10:328-329, 1988.
  8. Houpt M : Project USAP 2000-use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists: a 15-year follow-up survey. Pediatr Dent, 24:289-294, 2002.
  9. Nathan JE : Management of the refractory young child with chloral hydrate: dosage selection. ASDC J Dent Child, 54:22-29, 1987.
  10. Chowdhury J, Vargas KG : Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent, 27:191-197, 2005.
  11. Wilson S, Easton J, Lamb K, et al. : A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxyzine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care. Pediatr Dent, 22:107-112, 2000.
  12. Shapira J, Kupietzky A, Kadari A, et al. Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent, 26:492-496, 2004.
  13. Jensen B Benzodiazepine sedation in paediatric dentistry. Swed Dent J Suppl, 153:1-45, 2002.
  14. Lam C, Udin RD, Malamed SF, et al. : Midazolam premedication in children: a pilot study comparing intramuscular and intranasal administration. Anesth Prog, 52:56-61, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[56:MPICAP]2.0.CO;2
  15. Myers GR, Maestrello CL, Mourino AP, et al. :Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation. Pediatr Dent, 26:37-43, 2004.
  16. 이영은, 박미경, 김윤희 등 : 소아 진정 시 구강 협점막하로 투여한 Midazolam의 효과에 관한 연구. 대한치과마취과학회지, 5: 101-106, 2005.
  17. 박미경, 김윤희, 정상혁 등 : Midazolam을 구강 점막하로 병용투여한 진정법의 안정성과 Houpt scale을 이용한 진정효과에 대한 연구. 대한치과마취과학회지, 6:103-112, 2006.
  18. 이영은, 박미경, 김소영 등 : 점막하 Midazolam의 병용투여 시 BIS 분석을 이용한 진정평가. 대한소아치과학회지, 34:91-98, 2007.
  19. Houpt MI, Weiss NJ, Koenigsberg SR, et al. : Comparison of chloral hydrate with and without promethazine in the sedation of young children. Pediatr Dent, 7:41-46, 1985.
  20. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry : Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent, 29: 134-150, 2007.
  21. Houpt MI, Sheskin RB, Koenigsberg SR, et al. : Assessing chloral hydrate dosage for young children. ASDC J Dent Child, 52:364-369, 1985.
  22. Moore PA, Mickey EA, Hargreaves JA, et al. : Sedation in pediatric dentistry: a practical assessment procedure. J Am Dent Assoc, 109:564-569, 1984.
  23. Webb MD, Moore PA : Sedation for pediatric dental patients. Dent Clin North Am, 46:803-814, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(02)00026-5
  24. Martinez D, Wilson S : Children Sedated For Dental Care: A pilot study of the 24-hour Postsedation Period. Pediatr Dent. 28:260-264, 2006.
  25. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, et al. : Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics. 105:E42, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.3.e42
  26. 대한치과마취과학회 : 치과마취과학. 군자출판사, 서울, 283-284, 2005.
  27. Kao SC, Adamson SD, Tatman LH, et al. : A survey of post-discharge side effects of conscious sedation using chloral hydrate in pediatric CT and MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol, 29:287-290, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050590
  28. Rodrigo CR : Flumazenil reverses paradoxical reaction with midazolam. Anesth Prog, 38:65-68, 1991.
  29. Rubin JT, Towbin RB, Bartko M, et al. : Oral and intravenous caffeine for treatment of children with post-sedation paradoxical hyperactivity. Pediatr Radiol. 34:980-984, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1303-8
  30. Leelataweedwud P, Vann WF Jr : Adverse events and outcomes of conscious sedation for pediatric patients: study of an oral sedation regimen. J Am Dent Assoc, 132:1531-1539. 2001.
  31. Houck WR, Ripa LW : Vomiting frequency in children administered nitrous oxide-oxygen in analgesic doses. ASDC J Dent Child, 28:404-406, 1971. Positive response