DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고정식 교정장치 장착환자에서 슬림모 칫솔과 V형 교정칫솔 간의 구강위생관리 효과 비교

Comparison of slim bristled and V-shaped orthodontic toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances

  • 최진휴 (중앙대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Choi, Jin-Hugh (Department of Dentistry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2009.04.09
  • 심사 : 2009.09.26
  • 발행 : 2009.12.30

초록

본 연구는 고정식 교정장치 장착환자에서 V형 교정칫솔과 비교하여 슬림모 칫솔의 구강위생관리 효과를 평가해보기 위해 시행되었다. 고정식 교정장치를 장착하여 치료를 받고 있는 환자 34명(평균연령 $21.9\;{\pm}\;7.5$세)을 대상으로 무작위로 슬림모 칫솔(Nano silver slim $care.34^{TM}$, Aiio, Seoul, Korea)을 사용한 군과 V형 교정칫솔(Oral-B Laboratories Ltd., P&G Korea, Seoul, Korea)을 사용한 군으로 구분한 후 연구시작 시(Baseline), 2주 후, 4주 후 및 6주 후에 걸쳐서 하나의 칫솔을 교환하지 않고 변형 바스법으로 하루 2회 2분씩 닦도록 하여 치태지수, 치은염지수 및 치은출혈지수를 측정하고 비교 분석하였다. 연구 결과 6주간의 실험기간에 걸쳐 슬림모 칫솔군과 V형 교정칫솔군 간에 치태지수, 치은염지수 및 치은출혈지수 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 실험시기에 따른 변화에 대해서 두 칫솔군 모두 치태지수와 치은염지수는 연구시작 시를 기점으로 점차적으로 감소하여 4주 후에 저점을 보이고 6주 후에는 다시 상승하였고, 치은출혈지수의 경우는 V형 교정칫솔군의 경우 2주 후에 최저점을 보이다가 4주 후와 6주 후에는 점차적으로 상승하는 양상을 보인 반면 슬림모 치솔군의 경우 연구시작 시부터 6주 후까지 점차적으로 감소하는 양상을 보였다. 연령에 따른 두 칫솔군 간의 구강위생 관리 효과 비교에서 슬림모 칫솔군은 치태지수와 치은염 지수에서 20대가 10대에 비해 통계적으로 유의하게 작은 수치를 보였다 (p < 0.013). 이상의 연구 결과로 고정식 교정장치로 치료받는 환자에서 두 칫솔 모두 구강위생관리에 동일하게 효과적이었으나 20대 이상의 성인 교정환자에서 슬림모 칫솔이 V형 교정칫솔보다 치태제거 효과가 더 우수함을 보여 도움이 될 수 있음을 시사하였다.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a slim bristled toothbrush compared with a V-shaped orthodontic toothbrush in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: Thirty four orthodontic patients receiving edgewise treatment were randomly assigned to two groups, a slim bristled toothbrush (Nano silver slim care) and a V-shaped toothbrush (Oral-B). Plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index were recorded at the beginning of the study (baseline), 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after new toothbrushes were supplied and the results were analyzed statistically. Results: No statistically significant differences were found for plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index between toothbrush groups during the 6 weeks. Plaque and gingival indices were decreased at 2 weeks and 4 weeks but increased at 6 weeks in both toothbrush groups. Bleeding index in the V-shaped toothbrush group showed the lowest value at 2 weeks then increased at 4 weeks and 6 weeks but in the slim bristled toothbrush group decreased from 2 weeks through 6 weeks to under baseline levels. Patients in their twenties had significantly lower values than teenagers in the slim bristled toothbrush group (p < 0.013). Conclusions: The results would suggest that both of the toothbrushes are equally effective but the use of a slim bristled toothbrush may be of benefit in promoting gingival health for fixed orthodontic appliance patients in their twenties and over.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965;36:177-87 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177
  2. Lindhe J, Hamp SE, L$\ddot{o}$e H. Plaque induced periodontal disease in beagle dogs. A 4-year clinical, roentgenographical and histometrical study. J Periodontal Res 1975;10:243-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1975.tb00031.x
  3. Suomi JD, Doyle J. Oral hygiene and periodontal disease in an adult population in the United States. J Periodontol 1972;43:677-81 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.11.677
  4. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1976;69:285-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90077-4
  5. Lundström F, Hamp SE. Effect of oral hygiene education on children with and without subsequent orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:53-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1980.tb00720.x
  6. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:380-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01287.x
  7. Hussein EA, Acar A, Dogan AA, Kadir T, Caldemir S, Erverdif N. Investigation of bacteremia after toothbrushing in orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:177-84 https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.3.177
  8. Yu JK, Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Chang YI. Quantitative analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion to various orthodontic bracket materials in vivo. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:105-11 https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.2.105
  9. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1972;42:26-34
  10. Diamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA, Lang NP. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:326-33 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00979.x
  11. Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 1996;67:78-85 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.78
  12. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X
  13. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances--an overview. Br J Orthod 1992;19:199-205
  14. Finkelstein P, Grossman E. The clinical quantitative assessment of the mechanical cleaning efficiency of toothbrushes. Clin Prev Dent 1984;6:7-12
  15. De La Rosa M, Zacarias Guerra J, Johnston DA, Radike AW. Plaque growth and removal with daily toothbrushing. J Periodontol 1979;50:661-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.12.661
  16. Kilicoglu H, Yildirim M, Polater H. Comparison of the effectiveness of two types of toothbrushes on the oral hygiene of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:591-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70309-3
  17. Rafe Z, Vardimon A, Ashkenazi M. Comparative study of 3 types of toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:92-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.018
  18. Boyd RL, Murray P, Robertson PB. Effect of rotary electric toothbrush versus manual toothbrush on periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:342-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90354-5
  19. Wilcoxon DB, Ackerman RJ Jr, Killoy WJ, Love JW, Sakumura JS, Tira DE. The effectiveness of a counterrotational- action power toothbrush on plaque control in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:7-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81674-9
  20. Trimpeneers LM, Wijgaerts IA, Grognard NA, Dermaut LR, Adriaens PA. Effect of electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes on removal of plaque and periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:492-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70285-3
  21. Ho HP, Niederman R. Effectiveness of the Sonicare sonic toothbrush on reduction of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth and subgingival bacteria in adolescent orthodontic patients. J Clin Dent 1997;8:15-9
  22. Clerehugh V, Williams P, Shaw WC, Worthington HV, Warren P. A practice-based randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush on gingival health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Dent 1998;26:633-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00065-1
  23. Park CH, Hwang HS, Lee KH, Hong SJ. A comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes on oral hygiene status in fixed orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod 2004;34:363-70
  24. Park SJ, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Comparison of electric and manual toothbrushes on periodontal health in fixed orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:286-94
  25. Cha KS. Research on plaque removal by sonic toothbrush for patients with a fixed orthodontic appliance. Korean J Orthod 2004;34:189-95
  26. Jackson CL. Comparison between electric toothbrushing and manual toothbrushing, with and without oral irrigation, for oral hygiene of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:15-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81675-0
  27. Heasman P, Wilson Z, Macgregor I, Kelly P. Comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:45-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70236-7
  28. Hickman J, Millett DT, Sander L, Brown E, Love J. Powered vs manual toothbrushing in fixed appliance patients: a short term randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2002;72:135-40
  29. Womack WR, Guay AH. Comparative cleansing efficiency of an electric and a manual toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1968;38:256-67
  30. Kaklamanos EG, Kalfas S. Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of powered toothbrushes for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:187.e1-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.015
  31. Wilkins EM. Periodontal and dental indices. In: Wilkins EM, McCullough PA editor. Clinical practice of the dental hygienist. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1976. p. 273-83
  32. Lobene RR, Weatherford T, Ross NM, Lamm RA, Menaker L. A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clin Prev Dent 1986:8:3-6
  33. Thienpont V, Dermaut LR, Van Maele G. Comparative study of 2 electric and 2 manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:353-60 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.116402
  34. Hwang CJ. Analysis of characteristics of medical accidents and disputes in orthodontic area. Korean J Orthod 1999;29:1-15
  35. Heintze SD, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Finke C, Miethke RR. Oral health for the orthodontic patient. Hong Kong: Quintessence Publishing; 1999:65-87
  36. Gettinger G, Petters MR, Testa MA, Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, et al. The use of six selected teeth in population measures of periodontal status. J Periodontol 1983;54:155-9 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.3.155

피인용 문헌

  1. Changes in the oral environment during four stages of orthodontic treatment vol.40, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.2.95
  2. Effect of Novel Watermelon Mouthwash on Oral Micro Flora in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment vol.9, pp.37, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/582