Suggestion of Allocation Methodology of Environmental Pollution Cost on Multi - Product

복합생산품에 대한 환경오염비용 배분 방법론

  • Published : 2009.05.10

Abstract

In previous study, a new allocation methodology of common cost on multi-product have been suggested. The aim of this study is to suggest the methodology that allocates an environment pollution cost including carbon emission cost to each cost of multi-product. For this study, a supposed multi-energy system composed of twenty kinds of systems was made. The multi-energy system produces eighteen kinds of outputs that are electricity, steam, hot water, chilled water, ice, warm air, and cooling air from seven kinds of energy source that are LNG, coil, geothermal energy, sun heat, hydrogen, bio-mass, and waste. The new methodology was applied to the multi-energy system in order to allocate the environment pollution cost to each production cost, and twenty seven equations were induced. From this result, it is concluded that this methodology can estimate each unit cost and allocate each cost flow in any product of any energy system.

Keywords

References

  1. Carolyn, G., 2003, Regulation of heat and electricity produced in combined-heat-andpower plants, The World Bank, Washington, D.C
  2. Lozano, M. A. and Valero, A., 1993, Theory of the exergetic cost, Energy, Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 939-960 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90006-Y
  3. Valero, A., Lozano, M. A., Serra, L. and Torres, C., 1994, Application of the exergetic cost theory to the CGAM problem, Energy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 365-381 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(94)90116-3
  4. Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. and Moran, M. J., 1996, Thermal design and optimization, Wiley, New York
  5. Tsatsaronis, G. and Pisa, J., 1994, Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systemsapplication to the CGAM problem, Energy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 287-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(94)90113-9
  6. Lazzaretto, A. and Tsatsaronis, G., 2006, SPECO : a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems, Energy, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1257-1289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.03.011
  7. Oh, S. D., Pang, H. S., Kim, S. M. and Kwak, H. Y., 1996, Exergy analysis for a gas turbine cogeneration system, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, Vol. 118, pp. 781-791
  8. Kim, S. M., Oh, S. D., Kwon, Y. H. and Kwak, H. Y., 1998, Exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems, Energy, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 393-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(97)00096-0
  9. Kim, D. J., 1999, Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of power systems, MS thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea, pp. 85-95
  10. Kim, D. J., 2003, Suggestion of power and heat costing for an energy system, Korean journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 360-371
  11. Kim, D. J., 2008, A new cost allocation method on the multi-products of energy systems, Report of Enecos Inc. Available on : www.enecos.com
  12. Kim, D. J., 2009, Cost estimating of electricity and steam on a gas-turbine cogeneration, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 252-259
  13. Kim, D. J., 2008, Cost allocation of heat and electricity on a steam-turbine cogeneration, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 624-630
  14. Kim, D. J., 2009, Suggestion of the worth evaluation of cool air and the allocation methodology of cooling cost, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 201-208
  15. Kim, D. J., 2008, A suggestion for the worth evaluation of warm air and the allocation methodology of heating cost, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 654-661