Health Promotion Research on Community Collaboration and Partnership Building: Current Emphases and Directions

지역사회 건강증진 협력 개발 연구의 지향 과제

  • Yoo, Seung-Hyun (Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health/Seoul National University Center for Health Promotion Research)
  • 유승현 (서울대학교 보건대학원/서울대학교 보건대학원 건강증진연구센터)
  • Received : 2009.12.03
  • Accepted : 2009.12.12
  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: As collaboration for community health promotion is much emphasized, the concept and process of community collaboration for health needs to be discussed. This paper discusses varying types of collaboration and collaboration building processes and suggests directions for enhancing community collaboration research and practice. Methods: Leading literature on community partnership building and community health development and current community partnership research program information were reviewed. Results: Although the term collaboration is used interchangeably with cooperation, partnership, network, or coalition, conceptual differences need to be acknowledged in order to develop and reinforce the processes of collaboration. Collaboration building goes in hand with community-based participatory research and systems thinking, which should be supported by long-term, systematic planning and evaluation research. Conclusion: Collaboration for community health promotion needs to be defined and agreed conceptually, thus collaboration process can be developed. Effective collaboration building will be facilitated by systematic thinking and participatory research. Research support system should appreciate the time-intensive, process-oriented nature of collaboration building by providing long-term research funding and emphasizing process and long-term evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. 김창엽. 지역사회 건강증진사업에서의 부문 간 협력. 서울대학교 간호과학연구소 1999 학술대회, 1999
  2. 서영준. 보건소 단위의 건강증진사업에서 타 분야와의 상호 연계 체계 개발 및 평가. 연세대학교, 2005
  3. 안양희. 지역사회역량구축과 지역사회 간호. 한국보건간호학회지 2007;21(1):102-109
  4. 유승현. 건강증진을 위한 지역사회 기반 참여연구의 적용 방안. 보건교육․건강증진학회지 2009;26(1):141-158
  5. 윤태호. 부산광역시 건강증진사업 지지기반 구축 및 장기 발전 계획 개발. 부산대학교, 2005
  6. 이상이. 건강증진사업수행을 위한 국가, 지방자치단체, 민간단체 간 역할 분담체계 및 상호연계체계 개발. 2002
  7. 이선자. 건강증진과 타 분야와의 통합 접근모형 개발 - 중소도시형 건강도시 모형개발. 서울대학교, 2004
  8. 이인숙. 보건소 건강증진사업과 방문보건 사업간 사업범위 설정 및 사업연계 수행방안 개발. 서울대학교 간호대학, 2003
  9. 장명화, 조원섭, 윤난희, 곽민선, 유승현. 지역사회 건강증진사업의 협력유형 분류. 보건교육․건강증진학회지 2009;26(3):125-135
  10. 정민수, 길진표, 조병희. 지역사회 기반 조직을 이용한 지역사회 역량의 측정과 건강증진 기획 - 서울시 S구를 중심으로. 보건교육․건강증진학회지 2009;26(3):35-48
  11. 정민수, 정유경, 장사랑, 조병희. 지역사회 기반 참여연구 방법론. 보건교육․건강증진학회지 2008;25(1):83-104
  12. 정민수, 조병희. 지역사회역량이 주민 건강수준에 미치는 영향: 2006년 서울시 도봉구 주민 건강행태조사를 중심으로. 보건과 사회과학 2007;22:153-182
  13. 조성일. 건강증진 사업을 위한 보건소와 민간병원의 협력모형개 발에 대한 연구. 서울대학교. 2003
  14. Butterfoss FD. Coalitions and Partnerships in Community Health. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, 2007
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recovery Act Communities Putting Prevention to Work. 2009. [Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/recovery/]
  16. Community-Campus Partnership for Health. 2009. [Available at: http://www.ccph.info/]
  17. Himmelman A. Communities Working Collaboratively for a Change.Monograph. Himmelman Consulting Group: Minneapolis, MN, 1992
  18. Kagan SL. United We Stand: Collaboration for Child Care and Early Education Services. Columbia University Teachers College Press: New York, 1991
  19. Lantz PM, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel BA, Softley D, Guzman R. Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. Journal of Urban Health 2001;78(3):495-507 https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.495
  20. Leischow SJ 외 6명. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008;35(2S): S196-S203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014
  21. Mattesich P, Murray-Close M & Monsey P. Collaboration: What Makes It Work - A Review of the Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration (2nd Ed.). Amherst H. Wilder Foundation; St. Paul, MN, 2005
  22. National Association of County and City Health Officials. Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships - Achieving Healthier Communities through MAPP: A User's Handbook. National Association of County and City Health Officials; Washington, DC, 2004
  23. National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. Effective Community Collaboration. n.d. National Coalition for Homeless Veterans; Washington, D.C
  24. National Institutes of Health. Community-Based Participatory Research. 2009. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. [Available at: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/community_based_participatory_research/index.as px]
  25. Rosenthal MP, 외 6명. The coalition process at work: Building care coordination models to control chronic diseases. Health Promotion Practice 2006;7(2) Supplement:117S-126S https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906287061
  26. Rousso ST & Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health 2000;21:369-402 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369
  27. Winer M & Ray K. Collaboration Handbook: Creating, Sustaining, and Enjoying the Journey. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation; St. Paul, MN, 1994
  28. World Health Organization. What is the Healthy City Approach? 2009. [Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/healthy-cities/introducing/20050202_2]