DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessments for MGARCH Models Using Back-Testing: Case Study

사후검증(Back-testing)을 통한 다변량-GARCH 모형의 평가: 사례분석

  • Hwang, S.Y. (Department of Statistics, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Choi, M.S. (Department of Statistics, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Do, J.D. (Department of Statistics, Keimyung University)
  • 황선영 (숙명여자대학교 통계학과) ;
  • 최문선 (숙명여자대학교 통계학과) ;
  • 도종두 (계명대학교 통계학과)
  • Published : 2009.04.30

Abstract

Current financial crisis triggered by shaky U.S. banking system adds to the emphasis on the importance of the volatility in controlling and understanding financial time series data. The ARCH and GARCH models have been useful in analyzing economic time series volatilities. In particular, multivariate GARCH(MGARCH, for short) provides both volatilities and conditional correlations between several time series and these are in turn applied to computations of hedge-ratio and VaR. In this short article, we try to assess various MGARCH models with respect to the back-testing performances in VaR study. To this end, 14 korean stock prices are analyzed and it is found that MGARCH outperforms rolling window, and BEKK and CCC are relatively conservative in back-testing performance.

주식 수익률, 환율 등과 같은 금융 자료를 이해하는데 있어서 최근의 국제 금융위기를 통해 더욱 중요해진 이슈는 바로 변동성(volatility)이다. 변동성(조건부 이분산성)에 대한 모형은 Engle (1982)의 ARCH 모형과 Bollerslev (1986)의 GARCH 모형을 시작으로 수만은 연구가 이루어졌으며 특히 금융 시계열 분석에서는 시계열 자료들 간의 변동성을 함께 모형화 하는 MGARCH(multivariate GARCH) 모형이 널리 이용되고 있다. 추정된 MGARCH 모형들은 그 자체로서 여러 개의 변동성들 간의 시간에 따른 동적인 관계를 설명해주는 데 유용할 뿐만 아니라 추정된 (조건부)상관계수들은 hedge ratio 계산 또는 VaR 계산 등과 같이 금융시장에 대한분석에도 이용되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 국내 14개 최신 주가자료에 대한 MGARCH 분석을 수행하고 연관된 사후검증(back-testing)을 통해 MGARCH 모형들을 평가하고 있으며 사후검증 수치를 얻기 위한 S-PLUS 프로그램을 수록하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 송유진, 최문선, 황선영 (2008). 차원축소를 통한 다변량 시계열의 변동성 분석 및 응용, <한국통계학회 논문집>, 15, 825-835 https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2008.15.6.825
  2. 황선영, 박진아 (2005). VaR(Value at Risk) for Korean financial time series, <한국데이터정보과학회지>, 16, 283-288
  3. Bauwens, L., Laurent, S. and Rombouts, J. V. K. (2006). Multivariate GARCH models: A survey, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, 79-109 https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.842
  4. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  5. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498-505 https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358
  6. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F. and Wooldridge, J. M. (1998). A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 116-131 https://doi.org/10.1086/261527
  7. Christoffersen, P. and Pellitier, D. (2004). Backtesting value-at-risk: A duration-based approach, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2, 84-108 https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbh004
  8. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1008 https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
  9. Engle, R. F. and Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, Econometric Theory, 11, 122-150 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009063
  10. Kupiec, P. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models, Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84 https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
  11. RiskMetrics (1996). RiskMetrics Technical Document, 4th ed., J. P. Morgan, New York
  12. Tsay, R. S. (2005). Analysis of Financial Time Series, John Wiley & Sons, New York

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Dimension Reduction Methods for Time Series Factor Analysis: A Case Study vol.24, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2011.24.4.597
  2. Asymmetric CCC Modelling in Multivariate-GARCH with Illustrations of Multivariate Financial Data vol.24, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2011.24.5.821
  3. Performance Analysis of Volatility Models for Estimating Portfolio Value at Risk vol.28, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2015.28.3.541