Preventive Effect of Sugar-free Chewing Gum Containing Maltitol on Dental Caries in situ

  • Lee, Eun-Jung (Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jin, Bo-Hyoung (Department of Preventive & Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Paik, Dai-Il (Department of Preventive & Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Kyeong (Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2009.04.30

Abstract

The preventive effect of chewing gum containing maltitol, xylitol, gum base, and sugar on remineralization were investigated. The clinical study consisted of 8 weeks' randomized, double blind, controlled, cross-over clinical trials including 24 healthy adults had chew gum. After each test week, remineralization effect was evaluated by measuring microhardness and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microhardness of experimental chewing gum containing maltitol or xylitol was significantly higher than that of sugar gum (p<0.005). Images of SEM showed the remineralization effect of gum containing gum base, maltitol, or xylitol compared with sugar gum. Maltitol and xylitol gums were more effective in remineralization than sugar gum. It was concluded that maltitol and xylitol can be used as sugar substitute to prevent dental caries.

Keywords

References

  1. Leach SA, Lee GT, Edgar WM. Remineralization of artificial carieslike lesions in human enamel in situ by chewing sorbitol gum. J. Dent. Res. 68: 1064-1068 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680060201
  2. Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V. Caries preventive effect of sugar-substituted chewing gum. Community Dent. Oral. 29: 278-288 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290407.x
  3. Edgar WM, Dodds MW. The effect of sweeteners on acid production in plaque. Int. Dent. J. 35: 18-22 (1985)
  4. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Edgar WM, Jenkins GN. The effect of eating some British snacks upon the pH of human dental plaque. Brit. Dent. J. 145: 95-100 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804124
  5. Bar A. Caries prevention with xylitol: A review of the scientific evidence. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 55: 183-209 (1988)
  6. Bar A. Toothfriendly: Achievements after 10 years and future prospects. pp. 1-15. In: Sugarless-Towards the Year 2000. Rugg-Gunn AJ (ed). The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (1994)
  7. Nordblad A, Suominen-Taipale L, Murtomaa H, Vartiainen E, Koskela K. Smart habit xylitol campaign, a new approach in oral health promotion. Community Dent. Hlth. 12: 230-234 (1995)
  8. Makinen KK, Makinen PL, Pape HR Jr, Peldyak J, Hujoel P, Isotupa KP, Soderling E, Isokangas PJ, Allen P, Bennett C. Conclusion and review of the Michigan Xylitol Programme (1986-1995) for the prevention of dental caries. Int. Dent. J. 46: 22-34 (1996)
  9. Park KK, Schemehorn BR, Stookey GK. Effect of time and duration of sorbitol gum chewing on plaque acidogenicity. Pediatr. Dent. 15: 197-202 (1993)
  10. Van Loveren C. Sugar alcohols: What is the evidence for cariespreventive and caries-therapeutic effects? Caries Res. 38: 286-293 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1159/000077768
  11. Sicard PJ, Le Bot Y. Manufacturing opportunities with non-sugar sweeteners. pp. 112-135. In: Sugarless-Towards the Year 2000. Rugg-Gunn AJ (ed). The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (1994)
  12. Ooshima T, Izumitani A, Minami T, Yoshida T, Sobue S, Fujiwara T, Hamada S. Noncariogenicity of maltitol in specific pathogen-free rats infected with mutans streptococci. Caries Res. 26: 33-37 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1159/000261424
  13. Birkhed D, Edwardsson S, Ahlden ML, Frostell G. Effects of 3 months frequent consumption of hydrogenated starch hydrolysate (Lycasin), maltitol, sorbitol, and xylitol on human dental plaque. Acta Odontol. Scand. 37: 103-115 (1979) https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357909027577
  14. Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Wright WG. Adaptation of dental plaque to metabolise maltitol compared with other sweeteners. J. Dent. 28: 51-59 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00050-0
  15. Muhlemann HR. Sugar substitutes and plaque-pH-telemetry in caries prevention. J. Clin. Periodontol. 6: 47-52 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1979.tb02119.x
  16. Birkhed D, Edwardsson S. Acid production from sucrose substitute in human dental plaque. pp. 211-217. In: Health and Sugar Substitutes. Guggenheim B (ed). Karger, Basel, Switzerland (1979)
  17. Dills WL Jr. Sugar alcohols as bulk sweeteners. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 9:161-186 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.09.070189.001113
  18. Ziesenitz SC, Siebert B. The metabolism and utilization of polyols and other bulk sweeteners compared with sugars. pp. 109-149. In:Development in Sweeteners. Grenby TH (ed). Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK (1987)
  19. Scheinin A, Makinen KK, Ylitalo K. Turku sugar studies. V. Final report on the effect of sucrose, fructose, and xylitol diets on the caries incidence in man. Acta Odontol. Scand. 34: 179-216 (1976) https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357608997711
  20. Makinen KK, Makinen PL, Pape HR Jr, Allen P, Bennett CA, Isokangas PJ, Isotupa KP. Stabilisation of rampant caries: Polyol gums and arrest of dentine caries in two long-term cohort studies in young subjects. Int. Dent. J. 45: 93-107 (1995)
  21. Dodds MW, Hsieh SC, Johnson DA. The effect of increased mastication by daily gum-chewing on salivary gland output and dental plaque acidogenicity. J. Dent. Res. 70: 1474-1478 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700120101