Party-wear Consumers' Information Sources and Clothing Evaluative Criteria

  • Park, Hyun-Mi (Department of Clothing and Textiles, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Yun-Jin (Department of Fiber Industrial Design, Jinju National University) ;
  • Lee, Yu-Ri (Department of Clothing and Textiles, Seoul National University, Research Institute of College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

The volume of the party wear market is gradually growing in the Korean fashion market. The study attempted to examine psychological clothing benefits as the criteria for market segmentation, and identify differences in information sources. and clothing evaluative criteria in each segmentated market. The summary of the key findings are as follows. Three segments were identified by psychological clothing benefits: pleasurably self-expressing group, fashion-seeking group, and indifferent group. The differences in search information sources between the classified groups were identified The fashion-seeking group had a higher mean score on mass media. The pleasurably self-expressing group had higher scores on advice from friends, colleagues, or companions. The differences in evaluative criteria between the classified groups were also identified. Among the evaluative criteria, the splendid boldness and polished silhouette criteria showed a marginal difference between each group. This study can contribute as a cornerstone for future studies on party wear and market strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Aaker, D. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Captalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. N.Y. : The Free Press
  2. Andreason, A. R (1968). Attribute and Customer Behavior: A Decision Model in HH Kassarjian and I.S. Robertson. Perspectives in Consumer Behavior. Scott, Foreman & Co.: Illinois
  3. Ahn, S. H., Seo, Y. H, & Seo, M. S. (2000). An Exploratory Research on Hierarchical Causality of Personal Value, Benefits Sought and Clothing Product Attributes. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 24(5), pp. 652-662
  4. Haley, E. I. (1968). Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-Oriented Research Tool. Journal of Marketing, 32(3), pp. 30-35 https://doi.org/10.2307/1249759
  5. Kim, E. Y. (1998). The Relationship between Clothing Product Knowledge and Evaluative Criteria in Clothing Purchase Process. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 22(3), pp. 353-364
  6. Kim, M. Y. (1995). Theoretical Classification of the Clothing Evaluative Criteria. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 19(6), pp. 857-865
  7. Kim, M. Y., & Rhee, E. Y. (1988). A Study on Clothing Evaluative Criteria of Various Clothing Items (II). Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 26(3), pp. 1-12
  8. Kim, S. I. (2004). Introduction to Food Coordinate. Korean Eating-out Information: Seoul
  9. Koh, A. & Hong, H. (1995). Benefit Segments of the Female Apparel Market in Cheju. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 19(5), pp. 811-825
  10. Kotler, P. (1980). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control, 4th ed, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
  11. Hwang, J. (2003). The Effect of Value on Clothing Benefits Sought by University Students Purchasing Clothing Through Internet. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(1), pp. 154-161
  12. Lee, H. S., & AIm, K H. (1994). Consumer Behavior. Seoul: Bobmunsa
  13. Lee, Y. S. (2005). Single Marketing. Seoul: Business Books
  14. Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38(4), pp. 45-56
  15. Min, J. Y. (2006). A Study on the Space- Direction of Corporate Party. Unpublished Master's Dissertation. Sookmyung Women's University. Seoul, Korea
  16. Multi Shop on Rodeo Street in Apgujeong (2006.11.10). Apparel News. Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.appnews.co.kr
  17. Ok, K E. (2000). A Study on Benefit and Information Search Behavior of Apparel Purchase Related to Usage Situation and Consumer Involvement. Unpublished Master's Dissertation. Hanyang University. Seoul, Korea
  18. Park, E. J. (1992). Effects of Situational Variables on Clothing Purchase Behavior. Unpublished Doctor's Dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea
  19. Park, E. J. (1995). Causal Relationships of Apparel Buying Behavior on Usage Situations and Consumer Characteristics. The Journal of the Korean society of Costumes, 25, pp. 145-162
  20. Park, H. W. (1997). The Effect of Apparel Benefit on the Formation of Brand Image. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Women's University. Seoul, Korea
  21. Park, M, & Lee, Y. (2005). Explanatory Variables of Customer's Brand Loyalty to Fashion Luxury Goods. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 29(11), pp. 1485-1497
  22. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer Behavior. McGraw-HilllIrwin
  23. Products Related to Party is Boom in Auction. (2006.10.31). Apparel News. Retrieved October 20, 2006, from http://www.appnews.co.kr
  24. Rhee, E. Y. (1997). Fashion Marketing. 2nd. Kyomunsa: Seoul, Korea
  25. Ryou, E. J. (1997). Clothing Evaluation Processes Based on Means-end Chain Theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ewha Women's University. Seoul, Korea
  26. Shim, S., & Bickle, M C. (1994). Benefit Segments of the Female Apparel Market: Psychographies, Shopping Orientations, and Demographics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(2), pp. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9401200201
  27. Special Report: Hot Summer Party & Club Fashion. (August 2006). Fashionbiz, pp. 54-67