A Study of the Aesthetics of Mimesis in 2000s Fashion

2000년대 패션에 표현된 미메시스 연구

  • Yang, Su-Mi (Dept. of Clothing & Textile, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwon, Mi-Jeong (Dept. of Clothing & Textile, Pusan National University)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Since Homeros in Greece, Mimesis was thought to be an art to imitate the nature, and it means an imitation of the nature classically. Mimetic theories were set to be a kind of art work in the era of Renaissance, and the terminology of mimesis was widely used to replace it with an originality in the 15th century. The purpose of this study is to understand the aesthetics of mimesis expressed in 2000s fashion. For this purpose, I investigated the theories of the mimesis, categorized the definition, then applied those categories for 2000s fashion. Documentary studies were conducted through aesthetics, fashion books and demonstrative studies were processed by analyzing photos from collection fashion magazines and fashion site of internet. In the history of aesthetics, the mimesis could be defined into three categories; the similarity and the representation mimesis, the symbol mimesis and the abstraction mimesis. In fashion, the representation mimesis included a natural and a folk, a period that of 1900s and ancient representation mimesis. The symbol mimesis included psychology and fear symbol mimesis. The abstraction mimesis included hard color, a geometric simplification and distortion mimesis. Analysis on the mimesis expressed in 2000s modern fashion may provide an excellent method for understanding human aesthetic in costume.

Keywords

References

  1. Durix, Jean-Pierre(1998). Mimesis, Genres and Post-Colonial Discourse: Deconstructing Magic Realism. New York: Macmillian, p. 45
  2. Walter Benjamin (1933). $\ddot{u}$ber das mimetische Verm$\ddot{o}$gen. in W.Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften II-1, Suhrkamp, pp. 210-213
  3. G. Luk$\acute{a}$cs (1963). Die Eigenart des $\ddot{A}$sthetischenII. Werke Bd.12, Luchterhand, p. 356
  4. T. W. Adorno (1970). $\ddot{A}$sthetische Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfrut/M, Bd.7, p. 169
  5. 이주영 (1998). 추상미술과 미메시스. 한국미학예술학연구, 8, p. 102
  6. 김희숙 (2005). 꽃의 이미지를 활용한 패션조형 연구 : 미메시스 개념을 중심으로. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, pp. 22-97
  7. W. Tatarukiewicz(1980). A history of six ideas
  8. 손 효주 역(1990). 미학의 기본 개념사. 미진사, p. 311
  9. E. Hamiton and H. Cairns(eds.)(1964), The collected dialogues of Plato including the letters. Bollingen series LXXI(N.T.: Pantheon Books), pp. 746-747 (Republic: VI,511d-e)
  10. Aristoteles (1947). Poetica, R. Mckeon, Introduction to Aridtotle. New York: Random House, p. 627
  11. 이주영 (1998). 루카치 미학연구. 철학박사 학위논문시리즈, 제15권, 서광사, p. 57
  12. 구민경 (2003). 예술과 현실의 관계에 비추어 본 미메시스. 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, p. 17
  13. 손 효주 역(1990). 미학의 기본 개념사. 미진사, p. 314-315
  14. Werner Jung (1995). Von der Mimesis zur Simulation
  15. 장희창 역(2006). 미메시스에서 시뮬라시옹까지. 경성대학교출판부. pp. 15-99
  16. G. W. F. Hegel (1986). Vorlsungen $\ddot{u}$ber die $\ddot{A}$sthetik I, Werke, Bd.13, Suhrkamp, Frankfrut/M, p. 15, 178, 190
  17. J. Fr$\ddot{u}$chtl (1986). Mimesis: Konstellation eines Zentralbegriffs bei Adorno. K$\ddot{O}$nigshausen & Neumann, W$\ddot{u}$rzbrug, pp. 211-212
  18. G. Luk$\acute{a}$cs (1963). Die Eigenart des $\ddot{A}$sthetischen I. Werke, Bd.11, Luchterhand, pp. 352-353
  19. 신혜경 (2009). 대중문화의 기만 혹은 해방 벤야민&아도르노. 김영사, p. 149
  20. 자료검색일 2009.7.1, 자료출처http://blog.naver.com/mirva/15
  21. W. Tatarukiewicz(1980). A history of six ideas p. 348
  22. 자료검색일 2009.7.3, 자료출처 http://kr.dictionary.search.yahoo.com/search/
  23. 진중권 (2009). 미학오디세이I. 휴머니스트, p. 126
  24. Umberto, Eco (2004). Storia della Bellezza
  25. 이현경 역(2005). 미의 역사. 열린 책들, p. 346
  26. Hans Georg Gadamer(1900). Wahrheit und Methode
  27. 이길우, 이선관, 임호일, 한동원 역(1996). 진리와 방법. 문학동네, p. 171
  28. Jen-Luc Daval (1988). Histoire de la peinture abstraite. Hansan, Paris, p. 151
  29. Charles-Pierre Bru (1955). Esth$\acute{e}$tique de L'abstraction. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, p. 300
  30. Stephen Bann (1980). 'Abstract art - a language?' in Toward a new Art: essays on the background to abstract art 1910-1920. The Galley, London. pp. 130-133
  31. Stephen Bann (1980). 'Abstract art - a language?' in Toward a new Art: essays on the background to abstract art 1910-1920. The Galley, London p. 139
  32. 이주영 (1998). 루카치의 미술관: 회화에 있어서의 리얼리즘. 문예미학, 4, p. 203
  33. Collection, 2004-2005 S/S Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, pp. 23, 49, 103
  34. Betty Kirke (1991). Madeleine Vionnet. 東海淸美 편저. 服飾美學. 東京: 求龍堂, p. 39
  35. STYLE.COM, 2004 S/S Christian Dior, 자료검색일 2009.8.1, 자료출처www.style.com
  36. Collection. 2003-2004 S/S Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, p. 44
  37. STYLE.COM, 2004 F/W YvesSaint Laurent, 자료검색일 2009.8.7, 자료출처 www.style.com
  38. STYLE.COM. 2009 S/S Junya Watanabe, 자료검색일 2009.8.9, 자료출처 www.style.com
  39. Marilyn J. Horn, Lois M. Gurel (1981). The Second Skin
  40. 이화연, 민동원, 손미영 역 (1995). 의복: 제2의 피부. 도서출판 까치, p. 199
  41. J. Harvey (1996). Men in Black. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, p. 41
  42. 한국경제신문, 2006.7.30, 공포패션. 자료검색일2009.7. 10, 자료출처 http://www.hankyung.com
  43. Collection. 2004-2005 F/W Paris and Milano. 동아TV, p. 50
  44. STYLE.COM. 2006 S/S Christian Dior. 자료검색일 2009.8.9, 자료출처 www.style.com
  45. Duncan, Alastair (1994). Art Nouveau. World of Art. New York: Thames and Hudson, pp. 7-36
  46. Wood, Ghislaine (2003). Traditional Motifs Essential Art Deco. London: VA&A Publications, p. 21
  47. Hauffe, Thomas (1998). Design: A Concise History (1 ed.). London: Laurence King, p. 124
  48. Museum of London. Art Deco Style. 자료검색일 2009.7.15, 자료출처 http://arthistory.heindorffhus.dk/frame-Style21-ArtDeco.htm.Retrievedon 2008-11-06
  49. STYLE.COM. 2008 F/W Gareth Pugh, 자료검색일 2009.8.15, 자료출처 www.style.com
  50. Ian Chilvers & Harold Osborne (1988). The Oxford Dictionary of Art. Oxford University Press, p. 61
  51. 진성모 (2003). 현대복식에 표현된 변형에 관한 연구. 국민대 논총, p. 534
  52. Collection. 2004-2005 F/W Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, p. 80
  53. STYLE.COM. 2009 F/W Alexander McQueen, 자료검색일 2009.8.25, 자료출처 www.style.com