Understanding the Relationship between Value Co-Creation Mechanism and Firm's Performance based on the Service-Dominant Logic

서비스지배논리하에서 가치공동창출 매커니즘과 기업성과간의 관계에 대한 연구

  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

AIn the advanced - economy, the services industry hasbecome a dominant sector. Evidently, the services sector has grown at a much faster rate than any other. For instance, in such developed countries as the U.S., the proportion of the services sector in its GDP is greater than 75%. Even in the developing countries including India and China, the magnitude of the services sector in their GDPs is rapidly growing. The increasing dependence on service gives rise to new initiatives including service science and service-dominant logic. These new initiatives propose a new theoretical prism to promote the better understanding of the changing economic structure. From the new perspectives, service is no longer regarded as a transaction or exchange, but rather co-creation of value through the interaction among service users, providers, and other stakeholders including partners, external environments, and customer communities. The purpose of this study is the following. First, we review previous literature on service, service innovation, and service systems and integrate the studies based on service dominant logic. Second, we categorize the ten propositions of service dominant logic into conceptual propositions and the ones that are directly related to service provision. Conceptual propositions are left out to form the research model. With the selected propositions, we define the research constructs for this study. Third, we develop measurement items for the new service concepts including service provider network, customer network, value co-creation, and convergence of service with product. We then propose a research model to explain the relationship among the factors that affect the value creation mechanism. Finally, we empirically investigate the effects of the factors on firm performance. Through the process of this research study, we want to show the value creation mechanism of service systems in which various participants in service provision interact with related parties in a joint effort to create values. To test the proposed hypotheses, we developed measurement items and distributed survey questionnaires to domestic companies. 500 survey questionnaires were distributed and 180 were returned among which 171 were usable. The results of the empirical test can be summarized as the following. First, service providers' network which is to help offer required services to customers is found to affect customer network, while it does not have a significant effect on value co-creation and product-service convergence. Second, customer network, on the other hand, appears to influence both value co-creation and product-service convergence. Third, value co-creation accomplished through the collaboration of service providers and customers is found to have a significant effect on both product-service convergence and firm performance. Finally, product-service convergence appears to affect firm performance. To interpret the results from the value creation mechanism perspective, service provider network well established to support customer network is found to have significant effect on customer network which in turn facilitates value co-creation in service provision and product-service convergence to lead to greater firm performance. The results have some enlightening implications for practitioners. If companies want to transform themselves into service-centered business enterprises, they have to consider the four factors suggested in this study: service provider network, customer network, value co-creation, and product-service convergence. That is, companies becoming a service-oriented organization need to understand what the four factors are and how the factors interact with one another in their business context. They then may want to devise a better tool to analyze the value creation mechanism and apply the four factors to their own environment. This research study contributes to the literature in following ways. First, this study is one of the very first empirical studies on the service dominant logic as it has categorized the fundamental propositions into conceptual and empirically testable ones and tested the proposed hypotheses against the data collected through the survey method. Most of the propositions are found to work as Vargo and Lusch have suggested. Second, by providing a testable set of relationships among the research variables, this study may provide policy makers and decision makers with some theoretical grounds for their decision making on what to do with service innovation and management. Finally, this study incorporates the concepts of value co-creation through the interaction between customers and service providers into the proposed research model and empirically tests the validity of the concepts. The results of this study will help establish a value creation mechanism in the service-based economy, which can be used to develop and implement new service provision.

Keywords

References

  1. Alter, S., 'Service System Fundamentals: Work System, Value Chain, and Life Cycle,' IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2008, pp. 71-85 https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.471.0071
  2. Arnould, E.J., 'Service-Dominant Logic and Resource Theory,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2008, pp. 21-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0072-y
  3. Basole, R.C. and Rouse, W.B., 'Complexity of Service Value Networks: Conceptualization and Empirical Investigation,' IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2008, pp. 53-70 https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.471.0053
  4. Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R.P., 'Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production,' Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, January 2003, pp. 14-28 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.14.18592
  5. Brodie, R.J., Little, V.J., and Motion, J., 'Value Postures and the Service-Dominant Logic: Between-firm and Within-firm Business Perspectives,' 2008 2nd Otago Forum, 2008, pp. 140-164
  6. Bughin, J., Chui, M., and Johnson, B., 'The Next Step in Open Innovation,' McKinsey Quarterly, June 2008
  7. Chae, S.I., Research Methods in the Social Sciences, Third Edition, BnM Books, Seoul 2008. (in Korean)
  8. Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W., and West J.(Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, New York, Oxford University Press, 2006
  9. Cova, B. and Salle, R., 'Marketing Solutions in Accordance with the S-D Logic: Co-Creating Value with Customer Network Actors,' Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 37, 2008, pp. 270-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.005
  10. Gann, D.M. and Salter, A.J., 'Innovation in Project-Based, Service-Enhanced Firms: The Construction of Complex Products and Systems,' Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 7/8, 2000, pp. 955-972 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
  11. Glushko, R.J., 'Designing a Service Science Discipline with Discipline,' IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2008, pp. 15-27 https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.471.0015
  12. Hertog, P.D., 'Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Co-producers of Innovation,' International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 4, No. 4. 2000, pp. 491-528 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1363-9196(00)00024-X
  13. Hidaka, K., 'Trend in Services Sciences in Japan and Abroad,' Quarterly Review, No. 19, April 2006, pp. 35-47
  14. Howells, J., 'Innovation and Services: The Combinatorial Role of Services in the Knowledge-Based Economy,' International Conference on New Trends and Challenges of Science and Technological Innovation in a Critical Era, 2003
  15. Howells, J., 'Innovation, Consumption and Services: Encapsulation and the Combinatorial Role of Services,' Service Industries Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, January 2004, pp. 19-36 https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060412331301112
  16. Hsu, S.H., Chen, W.H., and Hsieh, M.J., 'Robustness Testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for Measuring Customer Satisfaction,' Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 17, No. 3, April 2006, pp. 355-371 https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500451465
  17. Kambil, A., Friesen, G.B., and Sundaram, A., 'Co-Creation: A New Source of Value,' Outlook, No. 2, 1999, pp. 38-43
  18. Karahasanovic, A., Brandtzaeg, P.B., Heim, J., Luders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J., and Jans, G., 'Co-Creation and User-Generated Content-Elderly People's User Requirements,' Computer in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, 2009, pp. 655-678 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.012
  19. Lee, K.J., Structural Equation Modeling: Causality, Statistical Analysis, and Inference, Kookmin University Publishing, 2005(in Korean)
  20. Lee, S. M., Covariance Structure Modeling in Social Science Research, SeongWonSa, 1990 (in Korean)
  21. Lee, S.M., A Fundamental of Factor Analysis, KyoYookKwaSakSa Publising, 2000(in Korean)
  22. Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., and Tanniru, M., 'Service, Value Networks and Learning,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 29, January 2009
  23. Maglio, P.P. and Sphorer, J., 'Fundamentals of Service Science,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, 2008, pp. 18-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0058-9
  24. Michel, S., Brown, S.W., and Gallan, A.S., 'An Expanded and Strategic View of Discontinuous Innovations: Deploying a Service-Dominant Logic,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2008, pp. 54-66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0066-9
  25. Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Alstine, J.V., Bennett, N., Lind, S., and Stilwell, C.D., 'Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models,' Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 105, No. 3, 1989, pp. 430-445 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
  26. Nam, K., Kim, Y.J., Kim, J.T., Bae, Y.W., Byun, H.W., and Lee, N.H., 'Service Science: Theory Review and Development of Analytical Framework,' Information Systems Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, April 2008, pp. 213-235(in Korean)
  27. Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., and Frow, P., 'Managing the Co-Creation of Value,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, 2008, pp. 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
  28. Petter, S., Straub, D., and Rai, A., 'Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 623-656 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148814
  29. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V., 'The New Frontier of Experience innovation,' MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2003, pp. 12-18
  30. Purvis, M. and Long, A., 'Wider Perspectives on Service-Dominant Logic,' 2008 2nd Otago Forum, 2008, pp. 166-185
  31. Roser, T., Samson, A., Humphreys, P., and Cruz-Valdivieso, E., 'Co-Creation: New Pathways to Value,' Promise Corporation Report, 2009
  32. Sandstrom, S., Edvardsson, B., Kristensson, P., and Magnusson, P., 'Value in Use Through Service Experience,' Managing Service Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2008, pp. 112-126 https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520810859184
  33. Silvia, S., Effects of Sampling Error and Model Misspecification on Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1988
  34. Smith, A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, University of Chicago Press February 1977(First published 1776)
  35. Syson, F. and Perks, H., 'New Service Development: A Network Perspective,' Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2004, pp. 255-266 https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040410542254
  36. Tenenhaus, M., 'Component-based Structural Equation Modelling,' Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 19, No. 7/8, August 2008, pp. 871-886 https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802159543
  37. Vargo, S.L. and Akaka, M.A., 'Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications,' Service Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 32-41 https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1.1.32
  38. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F., 'Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,' Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, 2004, pp. 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
  39. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F., 'Why 'Service'?,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2008a, pp. 25-38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0068-7
  40. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch. R.F., 'Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution,' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, 2008b, pp. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
  41. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., and van Oppen, C., 'Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, March 2009, pp. 177-195 https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  42. Williams, J. and Aitken, R., 'Marketing Ethics and the Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing,' 2008 2nd Otago Forum, 2008
  43. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., and Berry, L.L., 'Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing,' International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 2, 1985, pp. 33-46
  44. Zhang, X. and Chen, R., 'Examining the Mechanism of the Value Co-Creation with Customers,' International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 116, 2008, pp. 242-250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.004