Comparison of Simulated PEC Probe Performance for Detecting Wall Thickness Reduction

  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

In this paper, four different types of pulsed eddy current(PEC) probe are designed and their performance of detecting wall thickness reduction is compared. By using the backward difference method in time and the finite element method in space, PEC signals from various thickness and materials are numerically calculated and three features of the signal are selected. Since PEC signals and features are obtained by various types and sizes of probe, the comparison is made through the normalized features which reflect the sensitivity of the feature to thickness reduction. The normalized features indicate that the shielded reflection probe provides the best sensitivity to wall thickness reduction for all three signal features. Results show that the best sensitivity to thickness reduction can be achieved by the peak value, but also suggest that the time to peak can be a good candidate because of its linear relationship with the thickness variation.

Keywords

References

  1. Blitz, J. (1991) Electrical and magnetic methods of nondestructive testing, Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, pp. 163-165
  2. Renken, C. J. (2001) The Use of a Personal Computer to Extract Information from Pulsed Eddy Current, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 356-360
  3. Shin, Y. K. and Choi, D. M. (2007) Design of Shielded Reflection Type Pulsed Eddy Current Probe for the Evaluation of Thickness, Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing. Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 398-408
  4. Shin, Y. K., Choi, D. M. and Jang K. S. (2008) Development of Shielded Reflection Type Pulsed Eddy Current Testing Probe for Thickness Evaluation, Modern Physics Letter B, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 923-928 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984908015619
  5. Shin, Y. K., Choi, D. M., Kim Y. J. and Lee S. S. (2009) Signal Characteristics of Differential-Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors in the Evaluation of Plate Thickness, NDT&E International, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 215-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.09.006
  6. Stalenhoef, J. H. J. and Raad, J. A. D. (2000) MFL and PEC Tools for Plant Inspection, Insight, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 74-77