Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회지)

Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회)
권호 표지

A Preliminary Study of Near Real-time Precision Satellite Orbit Determination

준 실시간 정밀 위성궤도결정을 위한 이론적 고찰

  • 배태석 (세종대학교 공과대학 지구정보공학과)
  • Published : 2009.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For real-time precise GPS data processing such as a long baseline network RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) survey, PPP (Precise Point Positioning) and monitoring of ionospheric/tropospheric delays, it is necessary to guarantee accuracy comparable to IGS (International GNSS Service) precise orbit with no latency. As a preliminary study for determining near real-time satellite orbits, the general procedures of satellite orbit determination, especially the dynamic approach, were studied. In addition, the transformation between terrestrial and inertial reference frames was tested to integrate acceleration. The IAU 1976/1980 precession/nutation model showed a consistency of 0.05 mas with IAU 2000A model. Since the IAU 2000A model has a large number of nutation components, it took more time to compute the transformation matrix. The classical method with IAU 2000A model was two times faster than the NRO (non-rotating origin) approach, while there is no practical difference between two transformation matrices.

장기선 네트워크 RTK(Real-Time Kinematic) 측량, 정밀단독측위(precise point positioning) 및 전리층/대류권 지연 모니터링등 GPS를 이용한 실시간 데이터 처리를 위해서는 IGS(International GNSS Service)에서 제공하는 정밀궤도 수준의 정확도가 시간지연 없이 확보되어야 한다. 본 연구는 준 실시간 위성궤도결정을 위한 선행연구로서 일반적인 위성궤도 결정 방법, 특히 동역학적 방법에 대한 이론적 고찰과 가속도 적분을 위한 지구기준/관성좌표계 변환 방법에 대한 테스트를 수행하였다. IAU 1976/1980 세차/장동모델은 IAU 2000A 모델과 0.05mas 수준의 허용범위 내 차이를 보였다. IAU 2000A 모델은 기본적으로 복잡한 장동모델로 인해 변환행렬 계산에 많은 시간이 소요된다. IAU 2000A 모델에 기존 변환 방법을 사용하는 경우가 NRO(non-rotating origin) 방법에 비해 2배정도 빠른 결과를 보인 반면 회전행렬의 실질적인 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박관동, 조정호, 하지현, 임형절 (2003), 초신속궤도력을 이용한 신속한 고정밀 GPS 데이터 처리, 한국측량학회지, 한국측량학회, 제21권, 제4호, pp. 309-316
  2. 박수홍, 조겸래 (1992), 무궁화위성의 궤도결정, 한국자동제어학술회의 논문집, 대한전자공학회, pp. 692-697
  3. 박운용, 송연경, 이현우 (2004), RTK GPS를 이용한 대형구조물의 실시간 경보 시스템, 한국측량학회지, 한국측량학회, 제22권, 제1호, pp. 11-19
  4. 박필호, 박종욱, 조정호 (1996), GPS 위성의 정밀궤도력에 의한 기선결정의 정밀도 향상에 관한 연구, 한국측지학회지, 한국측량지회, 제 14권, 제 2호, pp. 199-207
  5. 손건호, 김광렬, 최규홍, (1995), 확장 칼만 필터를 이용한 LEO위성의 궤도 결정 방법, J. Astron, Space Sci., 한국우주과학회, 12(1), pp. 133-142
  6. 임형철, 박필호, 박종욱, 조정호, 안용원 (2001), 실시간 응용을 위한 GPS 정밀 궤도력 결정, J. Astron. Space Sci., 한국우주과학회, 18(2),pp. 129-136
  7. Bae, T. -S. (2005), LEO Dynamic Orbit Enhancement using Atmospheric and Empirical Force Modeling ION GNSS 2005, Long Beach, CA, pp. 1219-1226
  8. Bar-Sever, Y. and Kuang, D. (2004), New Empirically Derived Solar Radiation Pressure Model for Global Positioning System Satellites, The Interplanetary Network Progress Report, Vol. 42-159, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California
  9. Beutler, G., Brockmann, E., Gurtner, W., Hugentobler, U., Mervart, L, and Rothacher, M. (1994), Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): Theory and initial results, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 19, pp. 367-386
  10. Beutler, G.(2005), Methods of Celestial Mechanics: Vol. I: Physical, Mathematical, and Numerical Principles, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 50-61
  11. Byun, S.H. (1998), Satellite orbit determination using GPS carrier phase in pure kinematic mode, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, TX
  12. Feissel, M. and Mignard, F. (1998), The adoption of ICRS on 1 January 1998: meaning and consequences, Astron. Astrophys., 331, L33-L36
  13. Grejner-Brzezinska, D. (1995), Analysis of GPS data processing techniques: In search of optimized strategy of orbit and Earth rotation parameter recovery, Repot No. 432, Department of Geodetic Science and Survetying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  14. Heiskanen, W.A. and Moritz, H. (1967), Physical Geodesy, W.H.Freeman, San Franscisco, pp.18-39
  15. Hugentobler, U., Schaer,S. and Fridez, P. (eds.)(2001), Bernese GPS Software Version 4.2, Astronamical Institute University of Berne, Switzerland
  16. Jekeli, C. (2001), Intertial Navigation Systems with Geodetic Applications, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York, pp. 13-18
  17. Kwon, J.H., Grejner-Brzezinska, D., Bae, T. -S. and Hong, C.-K. (2003), A Triple Difference Approach to Low Earth Orbiter Precision Orbit Determination, The Journal of Navigation, 56,pp. 457-473 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463303002376
  18. McCarthy, D.D. (1996), IERS Conventions (1996), IERS Technical Note 21, U.S. Naval Observatory
  19. McCarthy, D.D. and Petit, G. (eds.) (2004), IERS Conventions (2003), IERS Technical Note No. 32, IERS Conventions Centre, Verlag des Bundesamts f\ddot{u}r Kartographie und Geod\ddot{a}sie, Frankfurt am Main
  20. Montenbruck, O. and Gill, E. (2001), Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods, and Applications, Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York
  21. Seeber, G. (2003), Satellite Geodesy ($2^{nd}$), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York, pp. 77-114
  22. Springer, T.A., Beutler, G. and Rothacher, M. (1999), A New Solar Radiation Pressure Model for GPS Satellites, GPS Solutions, Springer, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 50-62 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012757
  23. Wallace, P. (2007), Personal communications