Operative Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity in Male Patients

남성 무지 외반증 환자에 대한 수술적 치료

  • Youn, Te-Hyun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Namgwang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Kek (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Namgwang Hospital) ;
  • Shim, Hee-Jong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Namgwang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Young (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • An, Ki-Young (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine)
  • 윤태현 (서남대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김성택 (서남대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 심희종 (서남대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이준영 (조선대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 안기용 (조선대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.12.15

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the result of operative treatment of the hallux valgus in male patients. Materails and Methods: Total 11 cases (10 patients) of the hallux valgus deformity that treated with operation were evaluated. Following Mann's radiological classification system, there was 1 cases of mild, 8 cases of moderate, and 2 cases of severe. Preoperative, postoperative, postoperative 3 months and postoperative 6 months follow up standing radiographs were used as radiologic evaluation. And we evaluated radiological outcomes by hallux valgus angle (HVA), first-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), proximal phalangeal articular angle (PPAA) and clinical outcomes by hallux-metatarsophalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Result: Radiologically, the mean preoperative HVA $37^{\circ}$ and IMA $13.7^{\circ}$ were improved postoperatively as HVA $11.9^{\circ}$ and IMA $4.7^{\circ}$, and the mean preoperative DMMA $29.4^{\circ}$ and PPAA $8.6$ were improved postoperatively DMMA $13.9^{\circ}$ and PPAA $7^{\circ}$. But, postoperative 6 months follow up HVA, IMA, DMMA and PPAA was increased at $14.2^{\circ}$, $6.3^{\circ}$, $16.1^{\circ}$ and $8.3^{\circ}$. Average AOFAS score were improved from 61.2 points to 75.2 points. Conclusion: In our study, operative treatment of hallux valgus in male patients with proximal metatarsal osteotomy and distal soft tissue procedure showed good results but it was necessary to pay attention to increase aspect of follow up radiologic measurements.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn YJ, Hahn SH, Yang BK, et al: The results of distal chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus in young adult. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 9: 158-161, 2005.
  2. Borton DC and Stephens MM: Basal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 76: 204-209, 1994.
  3. Cho NH, Kim S, Kwon DJ and Kim HA: The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91: 494-498, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.9102.ebo2
  4. Coste F, Desoille H, Illouz G and Chavy AL: Locomotor apparatus and classical dancing. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic, 27: 259-267, 1960.
  5. Coughlin MJ: Women’s shoe wear and foot disorders. West J Med, 163: 569-570, 1995.
  6. Coughlin MJ, Grebing BR and Jones CP: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for idiopathic hallux valgus: intermediate results. Foot Ankle Int, 26: 783-792, 2005.
  7. Ferrari J, Hopkinson DA and Linney AD: Size and shape differences between male and female foot bones: is the female foot predisposed to hallux abducto valgus deformity? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 94: 434-452, 2004.
  8. Ferrari J and Malone-Lee J: The shape of the metatarsal head as a cause of hallux abductovalgus. Foot Ankle Int, 23: 236-242, 2002.
  9. Frey C, Jahss M and Kummer FJ: The Akin procedure: an analysis of results. Foot Ankle, 12: 1-6, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079101200101
  10. Gottschalk FA, Sallis JG, Beighton PH and Solomon L: A comparison of the prevalence of hallux valgus in three South African populations. S Afr Med J, 57: 355-357, 1980.
  11. Gottschalk FA, Solomon L and Beighton PH: The prevalence of hallux valgus in South African males. S Afr Med J, 65: 725-726, 1984.
  12. Johnson KA, Cofield RH and Morrey BF: Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 142: 44-47, 1979.
  13. Kato T and Watanabe S: The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 157: 78-81, 1981.
  14. Kinnard P and Cantin S: The Akin procedure in hallux valgus. Can J Surg, 34: 491-493, 1991.
  15. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS and Sanders M: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int, 15: 349-353, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500701
  16. Klosok JK, Pring DJ, Jessop JH and Maffulli N: Chevron or Wilson metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus. A prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75: 825-829, 1993.
  17. Maclennan R: Prevalence of hallux valgus in a neolithic New Guinea population. Lancet, 1: 1398-1400, 1966.
  18. Mann RA: Bunion surgery: decision making. Orthopedics, 13: 951-957, 1990.
  19. Mann RA, Rudicel S and Graves SC: Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74: 124-129, 1992.
  20. Mitchell LA and Baxter DE: A Chevron-Akin double osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle, 12: 7-14, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079101200102
  21. Pearson SW, Kitaoka HB, Cracchiolo A and Leventen EO: Results and complications following a proximal curved osteotomy of the hallux metatarsal. Contemp Orthop, 23: 127-132, 1991.
  22. Robinson AH and Limbers JP: Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87: 1038-1045, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02060
  23. Roddy E, Zhang W and Doherty M: Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum, 59: 857-862, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23709
  24. Shapiro F and Heller L: The Mitchell distal metatarsal osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 107: 225-231, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197503000-00026
  25. Sim-Fook L and Hodgson AR: A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 40: 1058-1062, 1958.
  26. Smith RW, Reynolds JC and Stewart MJ: Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle, 5: 92-103, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078400500208
  27. Yoo CI, Kim BH, Shin KS and Im Ji: A clinical and radiological study of the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle and hallux valgus of Koreans. J Korean Orthop Assoc, 25: 1188-1190, 1990.