한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제26권6호
  • /
  • Pages.520-523
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지

말의 정상안과 재발성 포도막염이 있는 안구에서의 Toll-like Receptor-2, -4, -9 발현 비교

Quantitative Differences in mRNA Expression of Toll-like Receptor (TLR)-2, -4, and -9 in Normal Equine Eyes and Eyes with Equine Recurrent Uveitis

  • 이나영 (노스캐롤라이나 수의과대학, 비교 안과 연구 실험실) ;
  • ;
  • Yi, Na-Young (Comparative Ophthalmology Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Salmon, Jacklyn (Comparative Ophthalmology Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Gilger, Brian (Comparative Ophthalmology Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 말의 정상안과 재발성 포도막염이 있는 안구에서의 TLR-2, -4, -9 mRNA 발현의 정량적 차이를 비교하기 위해 수행되었다. 정상 및 재발성 포도막염이 있는 말 각 6두 에서 안구를 적출하여 모양체, 홍채, 망막 및 맥락막을 수집하였다. Real-time PCR assay 통해 정상안과 재발성 포도막염이 있는 안구에서의 TLR-2, -4, -9의 mRNA 발현 차이를 정량적으로 비교하였다. 말의 재발성 포도막염 시에는 모양체, 홍채에서 정상인 경우에 비해 4-12 배의 TLR-2 와 TLR-9 mRNA 발현증가를 보였으며, 맥락막 및 망막에서는 2-6 배의 TLR-2, -4, -9 mRNA 발현 증가를 보였다. 본 연구 결과는 Toll-like receptor 2, -4, -9이 말의 재발성 포도막염의 병리기전에 영향을 미치고 있음을 시사한다. 하지만 재발성 포도막염 시의 Toll-like receptor 2, -4, -9의 구체적 역할을 밝히기 위해서는 다양한 후속 연구가 요구된다.

The purporse of this study was to evaluate the quantitative differences in mRNA expression of TLR-2, -4, and -9 in normal equine eyes and eyes with equine recurrent uveitis (ERU). Normal equine eyes (n = 6) and eyes with naturally-occurring ERU (n = 6) were collected. Real time PCR assay was performed to compare mRNA expression of TLR-2, -4, and -9 between normal and ERU eyes. A significant up-regulation of TLR-2 and -9 mRNA in the ciliary body and TLR-2 mRNA in the iris was found in eyes with ERU compared to the mRNA levels in these same tissues of normal equine eyes. There were no remarkable differences observed in TLR-4 mRNA expression between normal eyes and eyes with ERU. The current data suggest the potential involvement of TLR-2 and -9 in the pathogenesis of ERU. However, further study is required to determine the role of TLRs in ERU.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, Joosten LA, Roelofs MF, Radstake TR, Matera G, Popa C, van der Meer JW, Netea MG, van den Berg WB. Inhibition of toll-like receptor 4 breaks the inflammatory loop in autoimmune destructive arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 2957-2967 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22848
  2. Asagiri M, Hirai T, Kunigami T, Kamano S, Gober HJ, Okamoto K, Nishikawa K, Latz E, Golenbock DT, Aoki K, Ohya K, Imai Y, Morishita Y, Miyazono K, Kato S, Saftig P, Takayanagi H. Cathepsin K-dependent toll-like receptor 9 signaling revealed in experimental arthritis. Science 2008; 319: 624-627 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150110
  3. Brentano F, Kyburz D, Schorr O, Gay R, Gay S. The role of toll-like receptor signalling in the pathogenesis of arthritis. Cell Immunol 2005; 233: 90-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.04.018
  4. Chang JH, McCluskey PJ, Wakefield D. Toll-like receptors in ocular immunity and the immunopathogenesis of inflammatory eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 103-108 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.072686
  5. Chaudhuri N, Dower SK, Whyte MK, Sabroe I. Toll-like receptors and chronic lung disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2005; 109: 125-133 https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20050044
  6. Dai J, Liu B, Ngoi SM, Sun S, Vella AT, Li Z. TLR4 hyperresponsiveness via cell surface expression of heat shock protein gp96 potentiates suppressive function of regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2007; 178: 3219-3225
  7. Deeg CA, Amann B, Raith AJ, Kaspers B. Inter- and intramolecular epitope spreading in equine recurrent uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 652-656 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0789
  8. Deeg CA, Ehrenhofer M, Thurau SR, Reese S, Wildner G, Kaspers B. Immunopathology of recurrent uveitis in spontaneously diseased horses. Exp Eye Res 2002; 75: 127-133 https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.2002.2011
  9. Deeg CA, Kaspers B, Gerhards H, Thurau SR, Wollanke B, Wildner G. Immune responses to retinal autoantigens and peptides in equine recurrent uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 393-398
  10. Deeg CA, Pompetzki D, Raith AJ, Hauck SM, Amann B, Suppmann S, Goebel TW, Olazabal U, Gerhards H, Reese S, Stangassinger M, Kaspers B, and Ueffing M. Identification functional validation of novel autoantigens in equine uveitis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006; 5: 1462-1470 https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500352-MCP200
  11. Deeg CA, Thurau SR, Gerhards H, Ehrenhofer M, Wildner G, Kaspers B. Uveitis in horses induced by interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein is similar to the spontaneous disease. Eur J Immunol 2002; 32: 2598-2606 https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200209)32:9<2598::AID-IMMU2598>3.0.CO;2-#
  12. Dwyer AE, Crockett RS, Kalsow CM. Association of leptospiral seroreactivity and breed with uveitis and blindness in horses: 372 cases (1986-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 1327-1331
  13. Gilger BC. Equine Recurrent Uveitis. In: Anonymous Equine Opthalmology. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2005: 42-20
  14. Gilger BC, Malok E, Cutter KV, Stewart T, Horohov DW, Allen JB. Characterization of T-lymphocytes in the anterior uvea of eyes with chronic equine recurrent uveitis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1999; 71: 17-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00082-3
  15. Gilger BC, Salmon JH, Yi NY, Barden CA, Chandler HL, Wendt JA, Colitz CM. Role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of recurrent uveitis in horses from the southeastern united states. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69: 1329-1335 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.69.10.1329
  16. Huang X, Barrett RP, McClellan SA, Hazlett LD. Silencing toll-like receptor-9 in pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4209-4216 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0185
  17. Kanzler H, Barrat FJ, Hessel EM, Coffman RL. Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists. Nat Med 2007; 13: 552-559 https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1589
  18. Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Semin Immunol 2007; 19: 24-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2006.12.004
  19. Lamphier MS, Sirois CM, Verma A, Golenbock DT, Latz E. TLR9 and the recognition of self and non-self nucleic acids. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1082: 31-43 https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1348.005
  20. Lucchesi PM, Parma AE, Arroyo GH. Serovar distribution of a DNA sequence involved in the antigenic relationship between leptospira and equine cornea. BMC Microbiol 2002; 2: 3 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-2-3
  21. Palsson-McDermott EM, O'Neill LA. The potential of targeting toll-like receptor 2 in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Ir J Med Sci 2007; 176: 253-260 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-007-0103-1
  22. Verma A, Artiushin S, Matsunaga J, Haake DA, Timoney JF. LruA and LruB, novel lipoproteins of pathogenic leptospira interrogans associated with equine recurrent uveitis. Infect Immun 2005; 73: 7259-7266 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.11.7259-7266.2005
  23. Verstak B, Hertzog P, Mansell A. Toll-like receptor signalling and the clinical benefits that lie within. Inflamm Res 2007; 56: 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-007-6093-7
  24. Wagner H. Endogenous TLR ligands and autoimmunity. Adv Immunol 2006; 91: 159-173 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2776(06)91004-9
  25. Wollanke B, Rohrbach BW, Gerhards H. Serum and vitreous humor antibody titers in and isolation of leptospira interrogans from horses with recurrent uveitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219: 795-800 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.219.795
  26. Zhang YW, Davis EG, Blecha F, Wilkerson MJ. Molecular cloning and characterization of equine toll-like receptor 9. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2008; 124: 209-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.03.005