Structural Design of an Upper Control Arm, Considering Static Strength

정강도를 고려한 상부 컨트롤 암의 구조설계

  • Published : 2009.01.01

Abstract

This study proposes a structural design method for the upper control arm installed at the rear side of a SUV. The weight of control arm can be reduced by applying the design and material technologies. In this research, the former includes optimization technology, and the latter the technologies for selecting aluminum as a steel-substitute material. Strength assessment is the most important design criterion in the structural design of a control arm. At the proto design stage of a new control arm, FE (finite element) analysis is often utilized to predict its strength. This study considers the static strength in the optimization process. The inertia relief method for FE analysis is utilized to simulate the static loading conditions. According to the classification of structural optimization, the structural design of a control arm is included in the category of shape optimization. In this study, the kriging interpolation method is adopted to obtain the minimum weight satisfying the strength constraint. Optimum designs are obtained by ANSYS WORKBENCH and the in-house program, EXCEL-kriging program. The optimum results determined from the in-house program are compared with those of ANSYS WORKBENCH.

Keywords

References

  1. K.H. Lee and D.H. Kang, "Structural Optimization of an Automotive Door Using the Kriging Interpolation Method," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol.221, No.12, pp.1524-1534, 2007
  2. D. C. Lee and J. I. Lee, "Structural Optimization Concept for the Design of an Aluminium Control Arm," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol.217, No.8, pp.647-656, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070360692041
  3. M.S. Kim, C.W. Lee, S.H. Son, H.J. Lim and S.J. Heo, "Shape Optimization for Improving Fatigue Life of a Lower Control Arm Using the Experimental Design," Transactions of KSAE, Vol.11, No.3, pp.161-166, 2003
  4. Y. S. Kim, H. S. Son, J. Y. Park, S. G. Choi and S. H. Yang, "Finite Element Analysis to Design and Optimized Forming Conditions for Lower Control Arm," Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol.37A, pp.2539-2547, 2006
  5. P.S. Ahn, S.M. Baeck, H.D. Lee, D.U. Kim and W.J. Kim, "Development of Aluminum Automotive Control Arm Using Squeeze Casting Process," Proc. JSAE Annual Congress, Vol.18-06, pp.9-12, 2006
  6. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell and H. P. Wynn, "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments," Statistical Science, Vol.4, No.4, pp.409-435, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  7. A. Guinta and L. Watson., "A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial versus Interpolating Models," Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Mo, AIAA, Vol.2, pp. 392-440, 1998
  8. Bessert N. and Frederich O., "Nonlinear Airship Aeroelasticity," Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol.21, No.8, pp.731-742, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.09.005
  9. DNDE, ANSYS WORKBENCH-Simulation Introduction Release 10.0, Busan, Korea, 2006
  10. MSC Software Corporation, MSC.NASTRAN 2004 Design Sensitivity and Optimization User's Guide, Santa Ana, California, 2004
  11. VR & D, Inc., GENESIS Version 6.0 User's Manual, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 2000