DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Addition Level and Chemical Type of Propionate Precursors in Dicarboxylic Acid Pathway on Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Production by Rumen Microbes In vitro

  • Li, X.Z. (Animal Science department of Agricultrue college, Yanbian University) ;
  • Yan, C.G. (Animal Science department of Agricultrue college, Yanbian University) ;
  • Choi, S.H. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk University) ;
  • Long, R.J. (International Centre for Tibetan Plateau Ecosystem Management, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Jin, G.L. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk University) ;
  • Song, Man K. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk University)
  • Received : 2008.07.25
  • Accepted : 2008.09.04
  • Published : 2009.01.01

Abstract

Two in vitro experiments were conducted to examine the effects of propionate precursors in the dicarboxylic acid pathway on ruminal fermentatation characteristics, $CH_4$ production and degradation of feed by rumen microbes. Fumarate or malate as sodium salts (Exp. 1) or acid type (Exp. 2) were added to the culture solution (150 ml, 50% strained rumen fluid and 50% artificial saliva) to achieve final concentrations of 0, 8, 16 and 24 mM, and incubated anaerobically for 0, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h at $39^{\circ}C$. For both experiments, two grams of feed consisting of 70% concentrate and 30% ground alfalfa (DM basis) were prepared in a nylon bag, and were placed in a bottle containing the culture solution. Addition of fumarate or malate in both sodium salt and acid form increased (p<0.0001) pH of culture solution at 3, 6, 9 and 12 h incubations. The pH (p<0.0001) and total volatile fatty acids (VFA, p<0.05) were enhanced by these precursors as sodium salt at 3, 6 and 9 h incubations, and pH (p<0.001) and total VFA (p<0.01) from fumarate or malate in acid form were enhanced at a late stage of fermentation (9 h and 12 h) as the addition level increased. pH was higher (p<0.001) for fumarate than for malate as sodium salt at 3 h and 6 h incubations. Propionate ($C_3$) proportion was increased (p<0.0001) but those of $C_2$ (p<0.05) and $C_4$ (p<0.01 - p<0.001) were reduced by the addition of sodium salt precursors from 3 h to 12 incubation times while both precursors in acid form enhanced (p<0.011 - p<0.0001) proportion of $C_3$ from 6h but reduced (p<0.018 - p<0.0005) $C_4$ proportion at incubation times of 1, 3, 9 and 12 h. Proportion of $C_3$ was increased (p<0.05 - p<0.0001) at all incubation times by both precursors as sodium salt while that of $C_3$ was increased (p<0.001) from 6h but $C_4$ proportion was decreased by both precursors in acid form as the addition level increased. Proportion of $C_3$ was higher (p<0.01 - p<0.001) for fumarate than malate as sodium salt from 6 h incubation but was higher for malate than fumarate in acid form at 9 h (p<0.05) and 12 h (p<0.01) incubation times. Increased levels (16 and 24 mM) of fumarate or malate as sodium salt (p<0.017) and both precursors in acid form (p<0.028) increased the total gas production, but no differences were found between precursors in both chemical types. Propionate precursors in both chemical types clearly reduced (p<0.0001 - p<0.0002) $CH_4$ production, and the reduction (p<0.001 - p<0.0001) was dose dependent as the addition level of precursors increased. The $CH_4$ generated was smaller (p<0.01 - p<0.0001) for fumarate than for malate in both chemical types. Addition of fumarate or malate as sodium type reduced (p<0.004) dry matter degradation while both precursors in both chemical types slightly increased neutral detergent fiber degradability of feed in the nylon bag.

Keywords

References

  1. Callaway, T. R. and S. A. Martin. 1996. Effects of organic acid and monensin treatment on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation of cracked corn. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1982-1989
  2. Carro, M. D., S. Lopez, C. Valdes and F. J. Overjero. 1999. Effect of DL-malate on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Anim. Feed Sci. Tec. 79:279-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00034-6
  3. Carro, M. D. and M. J. Ranilla. 2003. Effect of the addition of malate on in vitro rumen fermentation of cereal grains. Br. J. Nutr. 89:181-188 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002759
  4. Castillo, C., J. L. Benedito, J. Mendez, V. Pereira, M. Lopez-Alonso, M. Miranda and J. Hernandez. 2004. Organic acids as a substitute for monensin in diets for beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Tec. 115:101-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.02.001
  5. Chen, M. and M. J. Wolin. 1979. Effect of monensin and lasalocid-sodium on the growth of methanogenic and rumen saccharolytic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38:72-77 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00694-06
  6. Demeye, D. I. and H. K. Henderickx. 1967. Competitive inhibition of in vitro methane production by mixed rumen bacteria. Arch. Int. Physiol. Biochim. 75:157-159
  7. Demeyer, D. I. and V. Fievez. 2000. Ruminants and environment: methanogenesis. Ann. Zootech. 49:95-112 https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000110
  8. Fawcett, J. K. and J. E. Scott. 1960. A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea. J. Clin. Pathol. 13:156-163 https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.13.2.156
  9. Garcı'a-Lo'pez, P. M., L. Kung and J. M. Odom. 1996. In vitro inhibition of microbial methane production by 9,10-anthraquinone. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2276-2284
  10. Hino, T. 1981. Action of monensin on rumen protozoa. Anim. Sci. Technol. 53:171-179
  11. Kung, L. J., K. A. Smith, A. M. Smagala, K. M. Endres, C. A. Bessett, N. K. Ranjit and J. Yaissle. 2003. Effects of 9,10 anthraquinone on ruminal fermentation, total-tract digestion, and blood metabolite concentrations in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 81:323-328
  12. L'opez, C., C. Vald´es, C. J. Newbold and R. J. Wallace. 1999. Influence of sodium fumarate addition on rumen fermentation in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 81:59-64
  13. Makkar, H. P. S. and P. E. Vercoe. 2007. Measuring methane production from ruminants (Ed. P. Harinder, S. Makkar and Philip E. Vercoe). Springer publishing Company
  14. Martin, S. A. and M. N. Streeter. 1995. Effect of malate on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2141-2145 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00034-6
  15. Martin, S. A. and C. M. Park. 1996. Effect of extracellular hydrogen on organic acid utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr. Microbiol. 32:327-331 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002849900058
  16. Miller, T. L. and M. J. Wolin. 2001. Inhibition of growth of methane-producing bacteria of the ruminant forestomach by hydroxymethylglutaryl-SCoA reductase inhibitors. J Dairy Sci. 84:1445-1448 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70177-4
  17. Nisbet, D. J. and S. A. Martin. 1990. Effect of dicarboxylic acids and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on lactate uptake by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3515-3518
  18. Nisbet, D. J. and S. A. Martin. 1993. Effects of fumarate, L-malate, and an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on D-lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr. Microbiol. 26:133-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577366
  19. Takahashi, J. 2001. Nutritional manipulation of methanogenesis in ruminants. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:131-135
  20. Ungerfeld, E. M., S. R. Rust and R. Burnett. 2003a. Use of some novel alternative electron sinks to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 43:189-202 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2003016
  21. Ungerfeld, E. M., S. R. Rust and R. Burnett. 2003b. Attempts to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis by blocking pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation. Can. J. Microbiol. 49:650-654 https://doi.org/10.1139/w03-079
  22. Van Nevel, C. J. and D. I. Demeyer. 1996. Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ. Monit. Assess 42:73-97 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394043
  23. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  24. Wolin, M. J. and T. L. Miller. 1988. Microbe-microbe Interactions. Elsevier, London, pp. 343-359

Cited by

  1. Rumen microbial response in production of CLA and methane to safflower oil in association with fish oil or/and fumarate vol.82, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00857.x
  2. Effect of Defaunation on In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Emission When Incubated with Forages vol.33, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.3.197
  3. Effects of Defaunation on Fermentation Characteristics, Degradation of Ryegrass Hay and Methane Production by Rumen Microbes In Vitro When Incubated with Plant Oils vol.34, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.3.193
  4. Conjugated fatty acids and methane production by rumen microbes when incubated with linseed oil alone or mixed with fish oil and/or malate vol.86, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12354
  5. Dietary linseed oil with or without malate increases conjugated linoleic acid and oleic acid in milk fat and lipoprotein lipase and stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene expression in mammary gland and milk somatic cells of lactating goats vol.94, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0291
  6. Linolenic Acid in Association with Malate or Fumarate Increased CLA Production and Reduced Methane Generation by Rumen Microbes vol.22, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80682
  7. Control of Methane Emission in Ruminants and Industrial Application of Biogas from Livestock Manure in Korea vol.24, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.r.02
  8. Metabolic Hydrogen Flows in Rumen Fermentation: Principles and Possibilities of Interventions vol.11, pp.None, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00589
  9. Effect of Methionine Supplementation on Rumen Microbiota, Fermentation, and Amino Acid Metabolism in In Vitro Cultures Containing Nitrate vol.9, pp.8, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081717