Serial Use of Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model of the Geum River using EFDC-Hydro and WASP7.2

EFDC-Hydro와 WASP7.2 를 이용한 금강하류의 수리-수질 연계 모델링

  • Received : 2008.10.08
  • Accepted : 2009.01.28
  • Published : 2009.02.15

Abstract

This study reports the serial use of a 3-D hydrodynamic model, EFDC-Hydro and a dynamic water quality model WASP7.2 that are maintained by USEPA. The 48 km section of the Geum River downstream between Daechung Dam and Gongju was selected as a sample study site. Topographical information was used to accurately represent morphology of the study site and boundary conditions were derived from governmental databases including WAMIS by Ministry of Land and Ocean and WEIS by Ministry of Environment. EFDC-Hydro was successfully calibrated for observed water level and WASP was calibrated using monthly observed water quality data obtained from the above sources. It was found that the current water quality target of BOD for the Geum River-H point could not be met on monthly basis though every other tributary of the area would meet its own water quality target as assigned in Korean TMDL. This study proposed the new target BOD water quality for the Gabcheon and Mihocheon as 4.3 and 3.6 mg/l, respectively so that the Geum River-H point can meet the target. When Sejong City is constructed, it is estimated that effluent discharge limit of BOD must be less than 4.5 mg/l to meet water quality of the point. This study shows that it is possible to carry out more precise modeling considering both water movement and water kinetics by using EFDC and WASP simultaneously.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부 (1999) 금강 수계 하천수 사용실태 조사 및 하천유지유량 산정 보고서, 대전지방국토관리청
  2. 건설교통부 (2002) 금강 수계 하천정비기본계획 보고서, 대전 지방국토관리청
  3. 공동수, 정동일 (2007), QUALKO2 설명자료, 국립환경과학원
  4. 국토해양부 (2008) 국가 수자원 관리 종합 정보 홈페이지 http://www.wamis.go.kr
  5. 기상청 (2008) 홈페이지 http://www.kma.go.kr
  6. 대전광역시, 금강 수계관리 위원회 (2005) 대전광역시 금강 오염총량 관리 기본 계획
  7. 서동일, 윤종욱, 이재운 (2008), QUAL2E, Q2K 및 CAP 모델 을 이용한 금강 하류 하천구간 정상상태 수질모델링 결과 비교 분석, 상하수도학회지, 22(1), 121-129
  8. 서동일, 최재훈, 이은형, 이혜근 (2001), EUTRO5를 이용한 시화호 수질 모델 보정 및 검증, 대한환경공학회지, 23(1), 131-139
  9. 서동일, 이은형 (2003), 불연속적으로 흐르는 소하천을 위한 CAP 수질모델의 개발, 상하수도학회지, 17(3), pp.372-377
  10. 이 은형, 서 동일 (2003) 현장 및 실험실의 실측을 이용한 CAP 수질 모델의 매개변수 산정, 상하수도학회지, 17(3), pp.444-450
  11. 이은형, 서동일 (2002) 용담댐의 영향분석을 위한 금강의 수질 모델링, 한국수자원학회 논문집, 35(5), pp. 525-539 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2002.35.5.525
  12. 서동일, 유하나 (2007) EFDC-Hydro 와 WASP7.2 을 이용한 QUAL2E 모델의 오차 원인 분석 - 한강하류부의 적용 사례를 중심으로, 대한상하수도학회 추계학술발표회 초록집
  13. 충청남도 (2004) 충청남도 금강 오염 총량관리 기본 계획
  14. 한국토지공사 (2007) 행정중심 복합도시 환경영향평가 보고서
  15. 환경부 (2008) 물환경정보시스템 홈페이지 http:// water.nier.go.kr/weis
  16. Ambrose, R. B., et al. (1988) WASP4, A Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model - Model Theory, User's Manual, and Programmer's Guide, USEPA, Athens, GA EPA/600/3-87-039
  17. Ambrose, R. B., Wool, T. A., and Martin, J L. (1993) The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5 User's Manual, USEPA
  18. Bowie, G. L., Mills, W. B., Porcella, D. B., Campbell, C. L., Pagenkopf, J. R., Rupp, G. L., Johnson, K. M., Chan, P. W. H., Gherini, S. A. and Chamberlin, C. E., (1985) Rates, Constants, and Kinetics Formulations in Surface Water Quality Modeling, 2nd Ed. USEPA, EPA/600/3-85/040
  19. Brown, L. C. and Barnwell, T. O. (1987) The Enhanced Stream Water Quality Models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and User Manual. EPA/600/3-87/007
  20. Chapra, S. C., Pelletier, G. J. and Tao, Hua (2007) QUAL2K: A Modeling Framework for Simulating River and Stream Water Quality (Version 2.07): Documentation and Users Manual
  21. Cole, T. M. and Buchak, E. M. (1995) CE-QUAL-W2: A Two-Dimensional, Laterally Averaged, Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model, Version 2.0: Users Manual, Instruction Report EL-95-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS
  22. Hamrick, J. M. (1992) A Three-Dimensional Environmental Fluid Dynamics Computer Code; Theoretical and Computational Aspects, The College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Special Report 317, 63p
  23. Hamrick, J. M. (1994) Linking Hydrodynamic and Biogeochemical Transport Models for Eatuarine and Coastal Waters. Estuarine and Coastal modeling, Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference, M. L. Spaulding et al, Eds., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 591-608
  24. Johnson, B. H., K. W. Kim, R. E. Heath, B. B. Hsiehh and H. L. Butler (1993) Validation of Three Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model of Chesapeake Bay, J. of Hydraulic Engineering, 119, 2-20 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:1(2)
  25. Park, K., A. Y. Kuo, J. Shen and J. M. Hamrick (1995) A Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic- Eutrophication Model (HEM-3D): Description of Water Quality and Sediment Process Submodels, Special Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary
  26. Park, S. S., Lee, Y. S., (2002) A water quality modeling study of the Nakdong River, Korea. Ecological Modeling, 152(1):65-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00489-6
  27. Tetra Tech, Inc., (2002) Hydrodynamic and transport extension to the EFDC model. A report to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, , VA
  28. USEPA (2008) WASP 홈페이지 http://www.epa. gov/athens/wwqtsc/html/wasp.html
  29. USEPA (2007) The Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code User Manual US EPA Version 1.01
  30. Wool, T. A., Ambrose, R. B., Martin, J L. and Comer, E. A. (2001) The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP6 User's Manual, USEPA