초록
본 논문은 기존 SC합성보에 비부착 긴장재의 정착위치와 도입된 긴장량을 변수로하여 포스트텐션 공법으로 휨보강을 실시한 실험체의 보강성능을 평가하여 적절한 휨보강 방법을 제시하고자 하였다. 실험은 각 유형별 실험체를 항복하중까지 가력하고 항복 이후 비부착 포스트텐션 보강을 실시 추가 가력하여 보강성능을 조사하였다. 실험결과 보강된 SC합성보는 보강전에 비해 향상된 항복내력 및 초기강성을 나타냈으며 최대내력의 실험값/이론값은 보강 후 ${0.95{\sim}1.13}$으로 나타났다. 보강 전 중립축과 그 상부에 정착구를 설치한 실험체(D160, 240계열)는 최대내력에서 긴장력의 차이에 따른 변화는 거의 없고 오히려 긴장력이 증가하면 연성이 감소하였으며 보강 후 중립축에 졍착구를 설치한 실험체(D120계열)는 긴장력이 증가하면 최대내력이 증가하고 또한 연성도 증가하여 보강 후 중립축에 대한 적절한 긴장력 보강이 매우 유효함을 알 수 있었다.
This study aims to suggest an appropriate flexural reinforcement technique by evaluating the reinforcement capacity of specimens that underwent flexural reinforcement according to the post-tension method with the anchoring position of an unbonded tension member on the conventional SC composite beam and the applied tension level as variables. For the experiment, up to a predetermined yield load was applied to each type of specimen and then, unbounded post-tensioning was additionally conducted to examine its reinforcement capacity. The analysis of the said experiment showed that the post-reinforced SC composite beam was characterized by significantly improved yield stress and initial stiffness, compared with the pre-reinforced one and the experimental measurements/theoretical values of maximum stress ranged from 0.95 to 1.13 following reinforcement. There was little or no change depending on the maximum stress and tension in the specimen (D160, Class 240) whose neutral axis and upper part had anchoring devices mounted prior to reinforcement. Rather, the ductility decreased with the increasing tension. On the contrary, in the case of the other specimen (Class D120) whose neutral axis had anchoring devices mounted after reinforcement, both the maximum stress and ductility increased with increasing tension, which indicates that the latter tension reinforcement was reasonably appropriate and effective for the neutral axis reinforcement.