DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

병원 기반 학대아동보호팀의 20년간의 활동 경험

A multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of child abuse in Korea

  • 송봉규 (서울대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실) ;
  • 김도균 (서울대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실) ;
  • 박혜영 (서울대학교 어린이병원 학대아동보호팀) ;
  • 황준원 (서울대학교 의과대학 정신과학교실) ;
  • 곽영호 (서울대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실)
  • Song, Bong Kyu (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Do Kyun (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Hye Young (Child Protection Team, Seoul National University Children's Hospital) ;
  • Hwang, Jun Won (Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwak, Young Ho (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2009.06.04
  • 심사 : 2009.10.08
  • 발행 : 2009.11.15

초록

목 적:학대아동보호팀은 아동학대 의심 사례를 평가/판정하고, 이를 아동보호전문기관이나 경찰에 신고하는 역할을 하는 병원 내 기관이다. 연구자들은 1개 병원 학대아동보호팀에서 20년간(1987-2007) 경험한 76건의 사례를 분석하여 학대 아동의 현황과 후유증을 알아보고자 하였다. 방 법:학대아동보호팀의 사례 기록과 의무기록, 아동보호전문기관의 기록을 함께 분석하였으며, 별도 제작한 양식에 맞추어 현재 보호자들과 사회복지사의 인터뷰를 통해 후유증을 조사하였다. 결 과:총 76건(남아 28명, 여아 48명)의 사례 중, 연령별로는 1세 미만이 6명(7.9%), 1-3세 10명(13.2%), 3-10세 41명(53.9%), 10세 이상 19명(25.0%)이었다. 학대 유형별로는 방임이 9건(11.8%), 성학대 27건(35.5%), 신체학대 44건(57.9%)이었다. 가해자는 친부모가 절반 이상이었으며, 학대 장소는 가정 내가 41건(53.9%)으로 가장 많았다. 총 24명(31.6%)의 아동들에 대하여 후유증에 대한 답변을 받았으며, 평균 추적 기간은 58.5개월이었고 평균 연령은 $8.3{\pm}6.4$세이었다. 이들 중 중등도 이상의 발달장애와 신체적 후유증을 보이는 아이가 각각 6명(25.0%), 3명(12.5%)이었으며, 정신과적 후유증을 총괄 기능 평가 척도(GAF)로 판정하였을 때 가벼운 우울증과 사회적/직업적 기능의 약간의 곤란을 의미하는 70-61보다 악화된 아이들이 13명(54.2%)이었다. 결 론:병원에 기반한 학대아동보호팀이 개입할 아동학대 사례는 전국 범위의 아동학대 사례들과 차이가 있을 수 있다. 이러한 차이점을 감안하여 보다 효과적으로 병원에서 발견, 신고되는 아동학대 사례에 대처하기 위한 노력이 필요하다.

Purpose:To review and determine the complications in 76 child abuse cases recorded by a multidisciplinary hospital-based child protection team between 1987 and 2007. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the reports and medical records of child abuse cases maintained by a university hospital-based child protection team. We devised a questionnaire for standardized interviews with the victims' guardians to determine the current physical and mental status of the children; questionnaires were answered by social workers of the child protection team who interviewed the present fosterers of 24 (35.8%) children. Results:Of the 76 children, 6 were infants, 10 were 1-3 years old, were 3-10 years old, and 19 were over 10 years old. Seven children (9.2%) were neglected and 27 (35.5%) and 44 (57.9%) were sexually and physically abused, respectively. In more than half of the cases, the perpetrators were the father or mother of the children. Most children (41 cases, 53.9%) were abused at their homes. The mean follow-up duration from the time of abuse infliction was $54.3{\pm}49.2$ months, and the current mean age of the children was $8.3{\pm}6.4$ years. Moderate and severe developmental delay and physical disability were observed in 6 (25.0%) and 3 (12.5%) cases, respectively. In 13 children (54.2%), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) score was less than 60, which indicates mild mental disability. Conclusion:A hospital-based child protection team may witness the different proportion of abuse types and patterns by conducting a nation-wide survey of child abuse cases.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. National Child Protection Agency, Child Protection Teams [cited 2009 May 12] Available from:URL://http://korea1391/ page/01040103.php
  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Child Maltreatment 2006. Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office, 2008:12-5
  3. National Child Protection Agency, National report on child abuse in Korea 2006. Seoul:Dongwon Printing Co., 2007: 10-29
  4. Anselm CW, Lee CH, Li KT. The impact of a management protocol on the outcomes of child abuse in hospitalized children in Hong Kong. Child Abuse Negl 2006;30:909–17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.003
  5. Winefield HR, Barlow JA. Client and worker satisfaction in a child protection agency. Child Abuse Negl 1995;19:897-905 https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(95)00052-A
  6. Keshavarz R, Kawashima R, Low C. Child abuse and neglect presentations to a pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med 2002;23:341-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(02)00575-9
  7. Fontana VJ, Robinson E. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of child abuse. Pediatrics 1976;57:760-4
  8. Hochstadt NJ, Harwicke NJ. How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up study. Child Abuse Negl 1985;9:365-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(85)90034-1
  9. Smith JA, Efron D. Early case conferences shorten length of stay in children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse. J Paediatr Child Health 2005;41:513-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00694.x
  10. Tien I, Bauchner H, Reece RM. What is the system of care for abused and neglected children in children’s institutions? Pediatrics 2002;110:1226-31 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.6.1226
  11. Paluszny MJ, Cullen BJ, Funk J, Liu PY, Goodhand J. Child abuse disposition: concurrences and differences between a hospital team, child protection agency and the court. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 1989;20:25-38 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706955
  12. Westman JC. The child advocacy team in child abuse and neglect matters. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 1996;26:221-34 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353239
  13. Wallace GH, Makoroff KL, Malott HA, Shapiro RA. Hospital-based multidisciplinary teams can prevent unnecessary child abuse reports and out-of home placements. Child Abuse Negl 2007;31:623–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.12.010
  14. Jones SH, Thornicroft G, Coffey M, Dunn G. A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry 1995;166: 654-9 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.166.5.654
  15. Mittmann N, Herrmann N, Shulman KI, Silver I, Shear N, Naranjo CA. Comparison of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in elderly depressed patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998;13:573-4 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199808)13:8<573::AID-GPS820>3.0.CO;2-Q
  16. Bates LW, Lyons JA, Shaw JB. Effects of brief training on application of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychol Rep. 2002;91:999-1006 https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.91.7.999-1006
  17. Choi JT, Ahn ME, Ahn HC, Choi YM, You KC, Cho YJ et al. Victims of child abuse to present to the Emergency Department. J Korean Emerg Med 1999;11:111-9
  18. Choi YJ, Kim SM, Sim EJ. A clinical study of child abuse. Korean J Pediatr 2007;50:436-42 https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2007.50.5.436
  19. Kim TK, Kim SH, Choi KS, Choi JY, Lim JY, Eom SY et al. Psychopathology of Sexually Abused Children In Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2006;45:165-73
  20. Lee HJ, Han HJ, Kim JH, Lee HS, Lee IS. Clinical investigation of child sexual abuse. Korean J Pediatr 2007;50:20-7 https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2007.50.1.20
  21. Silverman AB, Reinherz HZ, Giaconia RM. The long-term sequelae of child and adolescent abuse: A longitudinal community study. Child Abuse & Neglect 1996;20:709-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(96)00059-2
  22. Korean Medical Association, Guidelines for prevention and treatment of child abuse (For medical doctors). J Korean Med Assoc 2003;5:373-403

피인용 문헌

  1. A Clinical Study of Child Abuse Present to In-hospital Child Abuse Center vol.18, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.15746/sms.12.020
  2. 성폭력 외상이 소아청소년의 정신병리와 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 vol.25, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2014.25.4.217