Development of Biological Criteria for Water Quality Assessment using Benthic Diatoms

부착돌말류를 이용한 생물학적 수질평가지표 개발

  • Noh, Seongyou (Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Byeon, Myeongseop (Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Miah (Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Jaekwan (Nakdong River Environmental Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 노성유 (국립환경과학원 물환경연구부) ;
  • 변명섭 (국립환경과학원 물환경연구부) ;
  • 김미아 (국립환경과학원 물환경연구부) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소)
  • Received : 2009.07.07
  • Accepted : 2009.09.17
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

The present study was carried out to develop biological criteria for water quality assessment using benthic diatoms. Selecting of the indicator diatoms, three parameters were considered: broad distribution (180 taxa occurred over 3% at upper level), species abundance (158 taxa occurred over $1.5{\times}10^5cells/cm^2$), and sensitivity (184 taxa occurred more than once as 1st and 2nd dominant species). Overall, total 208 taxa were selected, including 38 varieties, 170 species, 34 genera, 9 families, 3 orders, and 1 phylum. The most dominant taxonomic group (family) was Naviculaceae (52%), followed by Diatomaceae (15%), Nitzschiaceae (12%) and Achnantaceae (11%). COD and TP were proposed as new water quality standards (draft) to improve the existing BOD standard and to manage and control efficiently non-biodegradable organic pollutants. With this regard, we used TP standard (draft) in developing biological water quality criteria for diatoms. TP standards (draft) proposed as Ia = 0.02 mg/L or less, Ib = 0.05 mg/L or less, II = 0.1 mg/L or less, III = 0.2 mg/L or less, IV = 0.4 mg/L or less, V = 0.6 mg/L or less and VI = above 0.6 mg/L. Biological assessment system (4 class system) was developed and proposed for diatom using modified Tropic Diatom Index (TDI). Biological assessment of TDI appear B grade (Good).

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국립환경과학원

References

  1. 김용재(2001). 신천의 부착규조 군집을 이용한 유기오탁 판정. 한국육수학회지, 34(3), pp. 199-205
  2. 김용진, 이옥민(2009). 부착규조류를 이용한 달천과 섬강의 생물학적 수질평가. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 25(4),pp. 606-614
  3. 김지환, 이석준, 오희목(2000). 금강 부착조류 군집의 동태.Algae, 15(4), pp. 287-297
  4. 박정원, 최재신, 김미경(2004). 낙동강 중류 지역의 부착규조 군집의 변화와 유기오탁지수(DAIpo)에 의한 수질평가. 한국육수학회지, 37(1), pp. 70-77
  5. 윤일병, 공동수, 유재근(1992). 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구(Ⅰ) -오탁계급치 및 지표가중치 산정을 중심으로-. 한국환경생물학회지, 10(1), pp. 24-39
  6. 이정호(1998). 낙동강의 부착규조와 유기오탁지수(DAIpo).한국육수학회지, 31(1), pp. 38-44
  7. 이정호, 김용재(1996). 낙동강 수계 댐호의 부착규조 및 영양단계 평가. 환경생물학회지, 14, pp. 18-28
  8. 이호원, 박문근, 김은희, 강현무, 이상명(2002). 남강의 부착규조 군집을 이용한 유기오탁 판정. 기초과학지, 16, pp.89-104
  9. 정승원, 박성환, 이진환(2008). 한강하류의 환경학적 연구 IIX. 갈수기 부착돌말류의 유기오탁지수(DAIpo index)에 의한 수질 평가. 한국환경생물학회지, 26, pp. 233-239
  10. 정준(1993) 한국담수조류도감, 아카데미서적
  11. 환경부(2008). 수질측정망 운영계획
  12. 환경부․국립환경과학원(2004). 물환경종합평가방법 개발조사연구(I) 최종보고서
  13. 환경부․국립환경과학원(2006). 물환경종합평가방법 개발조사연구(III) 최종보고서
  14. Cumming, B. F., Wilson, S. E., Hall, R. I., and Smol, J. P.(1995). Diatoms from British Columbia (Canada) lakes and their relationship to salinity, nutrients and other limnological variables. J. Cramer, Berlin. Stuttgart., pp. 207
  15. DIN 38410 Part2 (1990). German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge: biologicalecological analysis of water (group M); determination of the saprobic index (M2)
  16. Hofmann, G. (1994). Aufwuchs-Diatomeen in Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 30, pp. 241
  17. Jeffries, M. and Mills, D. (1995). Freshwater ecology. Principles and applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 285
  18. Kelly, M. G. and Whitton, B. A. (1995). The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7, pp. 433-444 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802
  19. Round, F. E. (1990). The effect of limiting on the benthic diatom population in three Upland Welsh streams. Diatom Research., 5, pp. 129-140 https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.1990.9705098
  20. Zelinka, M. and Marvan, P. (1961). Zur Prazisierung der biologischen klassifikation der Reinheid fliessender Gewasser. Arch. Hydrobiology, 57, pp. 389-407