Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Canola or Mustard Biodiesel Press Cake on Nutrient Digestibility and Performance of Broiler Chickens

  • Thacker, P.A. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan) ;
  • Petri, D. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan)
  • Received : 2009.05.14
  • Accepted : 2009.07.02
  • Published : 2009.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study compared the nutritional value of canola (B. napa) and mustard (B. hirta) press cakes obtained from the biodiesel industry as ingredients for use in diets fed to broiler chickens. A total of 210, one-day old, male broiler chicks were randomly assigned to one of seven dietary treatments. The control diet was based on wheat and soybean meal and contained 15% canola meal. For the experimental diets, 5, 10 or 15% of the canola meal was replaced with an equal amount of either canola or mustard biodiesel press cake. Dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility were significantly higher for birds fed diets containing either canola or mustard biodiesel press cake compared with canola meal. Dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility of the canola biodiesel press cakes was higher than the mustard biodiesel press cakes. Ether extract digestibility and nitrogen retention were significantly higher for birds fed canola biodiesel press cake compared with canola meal and mustard biodiesel press cake. Body weight gain and feed intake did not differ between birds fed canola or mustard biodiesel press cake and canola meal. In addition, there was no significant difference in body weight gain or feed intake between birds fed diets containing canola or mustard biodiesel press cake. Feed conversion was significantly improved for birds fed either canola or mustard biodiesel press cake compared with canola meal. Mortality was unaffected by treatment. Since the performance of broilers fed canola biodiesel press cakes was essentially the same as that of broilers fed canola meal, it is difficult to justify a premium to be paid for canola biodiesel press cake over that paid for canola meal. In addition, there was no difference in the performance of broilers fed biodiesel press cake obtained from canola or mustard seed. As mustard seeds are generally available at a lower price than canola seed, there may be some incentive to use mustard rather than canola seed for producing biodiesel press cake for use in poultry production.

Keywords

References

  1. Abiola, A., T. McDonald, C. Vandenberg, S. Gil and B. Zenert. 2007. Biodiesel production and demonstraton. Olds College School of Innovation, Olds, Alberta. Factsheet available at:www.oldscollege.ca/schools/ocsi/bioenergy/pdf/biodieselPoster-March2007
  2. Alrich, G. C., N. R. Merchen, J. K. Drackley, S. S. Gonzalez, G. C. Fahey and L. L. Berger. 1997. The effects of chemical treatment of whole canola seed on lipid and protein digestion by steers. J. Anim. Sci. 75:502-511
  3. Anderson, C. 2007. Count on canola for your biodiesel. Biofuels Canada 1:32-36
  4. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2007. Official methods of analysis, 18th edn, AOAC, Washington, DC
  5. Bell, J. M. 1990. Mustard meal. In: Non-traditional feed sources for use in swine production (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworths, Stoneham, Massachusetts, pp. 265-274
  6. Bell, J. M., A. Shires, J. A. Blake, S. Campbell and D. I. McGregor. 1981. Effect of alkali treatment and amino acid supplementation on the nutritive value of yellow and oriental mustard meal for swine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 61:783-792 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas81-095
  7. Beshada, E., D. Small and D. Hodgkinson. 2008. Challenges facing small and medium scale biodiesel production facilities in Western Canada. Growing the Margin: Energy, Bioproducts from Farm and Food Sectors Conference, April 2, 2008, London, Ontario
  8. Blair, R., R. Misir, J. M. Bell and D. R. Clandinin. 1986. The chemical composition and nutritional value for chickens of meal from recent cultivars of canola. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:821-825 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-090
  9. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON (1993)
  10. Cheva-Isarakul, B., S. Tangtaweewipat, P. Sangrijun and K. Yamauchi. 2003. Chemical composition and metabolisable energy of mustard meal. J. Poult. Sci. 40:221-225 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.40.221
  11. Dale, N. and A. Batal. 2007. Ingredient analysis table: 2007 edition. Feedstuffs Reference Issue and Buying Guide, Feedstuffs 78:16-23
  12. Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  13. Getinet, A., G. Rakow, J. P. Raney and R. K. Downey. 1994. Development of zero erucic acid Ethiopian mustard through an inter-specific cross with zero erucic acid Oriental mustard. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:793-795 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps94-141
  14. Hancock, N. 2005. Biodiesel overview on global production and policy. Government of Western Australia, Department of Agriculture and Food, Factsheet available at www.agric.wa.gov.au/content/sust/biofuel/200511_bdworldoverview.pdf
  15. Hickling, D. 2001. Canola meal feed industry guide 3rd Edition, Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba p. 39
  16. Keith, M. O. and J. M. Bell. 1991. Composition and digestibility of canola press cake as a feedstuff for use in swine diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:879-885 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-103
  17. Koh, L. P. 2007. Potential habitat and biodiversity losses from intensified biodiesel feedstock production. Conserv. Biol. 21:1373-1375 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00771.x
  18. Latshaw, J. D. 2008. Daily energy intake of broiler chickens is altered by proximate nutrient content and form of the diet. Poult. Sci. 87:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00173
  19. Leeson, S., S. J. Slinger and J. D. Summers. 1978. Utilization of whole tower rapeseed by laying hens and broiler chickens. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58:55-61 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas78-008
  20. Licht, F. O. 2007. World biodiesel markets: The outlook to 2010. Agra Informa Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom, p. 200
  21. Lodhi, G. N., N. S. Malik and J. S. Ichhponani. 1974. Metabolisable energy, nitrogen absorbability and feeding value of expeller processed mustard cake for chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 15:459-465 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667408416134
  22. Love, H. K., G. Rakow, J. P. Raney and R. K. Downey. 1990. Development of low glucosinolate mustard. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:419-424 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps90-049
  23. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 155
  24. Natural Resources Canada. 2008. Biodiesel: What is biodiesel? Factsheet available at: http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/ transportation/fuels/biodiesel/biodiesel.cfm. June 19, 2008
  25. Novus. 1994. Raw material compendium: A compilation of worldwide data sources, Novus International, St Louis, Missouri, p. 541
  26. Prasad, A. and P. V. Rao. 1982. Factors limiting the utilization of mustard-cake by chicken. Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 52:417-422
  27. Rao, P. V. 1977. Recent research on the utilization of mustard oil cake in poultry. Poult. Advisor 6:17-23
  28. Ravindran, V. and R. Blair. 1992. Feed resources for poultry production in Asian and the Pacific. II. Plant protein sources. World Poult. Sci. J. 48:205-231 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19920017
  29. Riley, W. W. 2004. The Canadian biodiesel industry: An analysis of potential feedstocks. Biodiesel Association of Canada. (online) Report available at www.greenfuels.org. June 19, 2008
  30. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC
  31. Schneider, B. H. and W. P. Flatt. 1975. The evaluation of feeds through digestibility experiments. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia. p. 423
  32. Schone, F., U. Kirchheim, W. Schumann and H. Ludke. 1996. Apparent digestibility of high-fat rapeseed press cake in growing pigs and effects on feed intake, growth and weight of thyroid and liver. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 62:97-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)00993-5
  33. Schone, F., B. Rudolph, U. Kirchheim and G. Knapp. 1997. Counteracting the negative effects of rapseed and rapeseed press cake in pig diets. Br. J. Nutr. 78:947-962 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970211
  34. Summers, J. D., H. Shen and S. Leeson. 1982. The value of canola seed in poultry diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62:861-868 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas82-104
  35. Thacker, P. A. and R. W. Newkirk. 2004. Performance of growing finishing pigs fed barley-based diets containing toasted or nontoasted canola meal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85:53-59
  36. Thacker, P. A. 1998. Effect of micronization of full-fat canola seed on performance and carcass characteristics of growingfinishing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 71:89-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00133-8
  37. Thies, W. 1980. Analysis of glucosinolates via 'on colum' desulfation. In: Analytical chemistry of rapeseed and its products (Ed. J. Daun, D. I. McGregor and E. E. McGregor). The Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba pp. 66-71
  38. Tyson, K. S., J. Brown and M. Moora. 2000. Industrial mustard crops for biodiesel and biopesticides. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, available at http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=Industrial+mustard+crops+for+biodiesel&btnG
  39. Vaidya, S. V., B. Panda and P. V. Rao. 1979. Studies on nutritive value and utilization of mustard oil cake (MOC) in broilers. Ind. Vet. J. 56:875-884
  40. Vaidya, S. V., B. Panda and P. V. Rao. 1975. Utilization of mustard oil cake in poultry feed. Indian Farming 2:25-26
  41. Vieira, S. L., A. M. Penz, A. M. Kessler and J. V. Ludke. 1997. Broiler utilization of diets formulated with high oil corn and energy from fat. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:404-409
  42. Woods, D. L., J. J. Capcara and R. K. Downey. 1991. The potential of mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Coss) as an edible oil crop on the Canadian Prairies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:195-198 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps91-025

Cited by

  1. Effect of Pressing and Combination of Three Storage Temperatures and Times on Chemical Composition and Fatty Acid Profile of Canola Expellers vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e43
  2. Rumen fermentation and microbial yield of high- or low-protein diets containing ground soybean seeds or homemade rapeseed expellers evaluated with RUSITEC vol.93, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2013-007
  3. Canolol, tocopherols, plastochromanol-8, and phytosterols content in residual oil extracted from rapeseed expeller cake obtained from roasted seed vol.118, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201500314
  4. Impact of second line limiting amino acids’ deficiency in broilers fed low protein diets with rapeseed meal and de-oiled rice bran vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.350-357
  5. Co-products from Biofuel Processing in Dairy Cows vol.65, pp.29, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02330
  6. Review on Nutritional Limitations and Opportunities of using Rapeseed Meal and other Rape Seed by - Products in Animal Feeding vol.8, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.15406/jnhfe.2018.08.00254
  7. Effect of heat treatment and heat treatment in combination with lignosulfonate on in situ rumen degradability of canola cake crude protein, lysine, and methionine vol.100, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0216