Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (한국산업보건학회지)

Korean Industrial Hygiene Association (한국산업보건학회)
권호 표지

Regulatory Compliance for the Working Environment Measurement System in Korea

작업환경측정제도 규제 순응 실태

  • Byeon, Sang-Hoon (Dept. of Environmental Health, Korea University) ;
  • Yi, Kwan-Hyung (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Yu, Gae-Muk (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Phee, Young Gyu (Faculty of Health Science, Daegu Hanny University)
  • 변상훈 (고려대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 이관형 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 유계묵 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 피영규 (대구한의대학교 보건학부)
  • Received : 2009.07.29
  • Accepted : 2009.09.10
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The regulatory recognition, regulatory approval, and observance for employer, inspector, and worker groups were investigated for the Korean measurement system in working environments. The employer, worker, and inspector showed an agreement of 90~97 % for the measurement of working environments. This survey showed that the measurement system of working environments has been settled in Korea. However, this survey showed an agreement of 81~87 % for reporting the results of working environment, involvement of worker representative, improvement of working environment, and holding presentations for working environment measurement. The employer recognized well for the measurement of working environments, involvement of worker representative, improvement of working environment, and holding presentations for working environment measurement, but the employee did not recognize well them as much as the employer did. Thus, the improvements for the recognition for involvement of worker representative, improvement of working environment, and holding presentations for working environment measurement by the employee are needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국산업안전보건공단

References

  1. 강성규. 작업환경측정 제도 혁신 안의 배경과 내용에 대한이해. 산업보건 2006;4-10
  2. 김정만. 원정일. 노영만. 합리적인 작업환경측정 주기 개선 등에 관한 연구. 한국산업안전보건공단 보고서 2007
  3. 김태윤. 현행 규제개혁 추진체계의 재검토 - 선진국과 우리의 경험과 교훈을 중심으로 -. 규제연구 1998;7(2):4-33
  4. 노동부. 산업안전보건법. 2008
  5. 박두용. 위험성 평가제도의 도입방안에 대한 연구, 노동부 정책연구용역사업 보고서. 2004
  6. 박정균. 작업환경측정제도의 개선방안에 관한 고찰. 경인논집 1994;3:167-192
  7. 소영진. 한국의 산업안전보건규제 개선방안 연구: 자율규제 개념을 중심으로. 한국정책회보 1999;8(2):183-204
  8. 오세민. 박정근. 작업환경측정방법의 적정화 연구_측정대상 확대 및 측정회수의 개선을 중심으로 산업안전보건연구원 보고서. 1997;1997-03-017
  9. 이관형. 이경용. 손두익. 서남규. 서광국 et al. 5인 미만 사업장의 산업안전 규제 순응 실태. 산업안전학회지 2003;18(4):130-135
  10. 정지연. 박승현. 작업환경 측정, 분석 방법 연구, 산업안전보건 연구원 보고서. 2004;2004-11-92
  11. 최상준. 작업환경측정제도 운영 실태에 관한 고찰. 한국산업 위생학회지 2008;18(4):282-292
  12. Braithwaite J. Improving Regulatory Compliance: Strategies and Practical Applications in OECD Countries. PUMA Occasional Papers, Regulatory Management and Reform Series No.3. 1993
  13. KOSHA. Occupational Health Newspaper. 2008
  14. OCED. The Preliminary Report on the State of Regulatory Compliance (The PUMA Regulatory Quality Review: Review of Japan and Mexico, PUMA/REG. 1998;98
  15. OECD. The Preliminary Report on the State of Regulatory Compliance (The PUMA Regulatory Quality Review: Review of Japan and Mexico, PUMA/REG. 1998
  16. OECD. The State of Regulatory Compliance: Supporting Materials. PUMA/REG(99)/ ANN. 1999
  17. OECD. Draft Report: Innovative Approaches to Improve Regulatory Compliance in the Field of Environmental Protection: Non-European Initiatives. PUMA/REG. 2000