상하수도학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)

  • 제23권5호
  • /
  • Pages.527-537
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-7672(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-822X(eISSN)
대한상하수도학회 (The Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)
권호 표지

내부 Baffle을 설치한 MBR 공정에서 HRT와 MLSS농도, DO농도 변화가 질소제거 효율에 미치는 영향

The Effects of HRT, MLSS and DO on Nitrogen Removal Efficiency in MBR Process with Internal Baffle

  • 투고 : 2009.05.13
  • 심사 : 2009.09.04
  • 발행 : 2009.10.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Three sets of parallel MBRs (reactor No.1, reactor No.2, reactor No.3) maintaining an MLSS of 4,000 mg/L, 6,000 mg/L and 8,000 mg/L, respectively, were operated to investigate the effect of various HRTs and DO concentration of MBRs on the removal efficiency of organic matters and nitrogen. The HRTs were operated on 4 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr. DO concentrations were ranged 1.5~2.0 mg/L and 0.5~1.0 mg/L respectively on each HRT conditions. MBR was divided into an aerated part and non-aerated part by baffle placed under the water. DO concentrations were controlled by altering the position of baffle. In terms of TSS and CODCr, all systems had a similar level of the removal under varied HRTs and MLSS. TSS removal efficiency was more than 99% and CODCr removal was ranged 94~97% under all conditions. Under the same condition on the HRT and MLSS concentrations, DO concentrations did not affect the organic removal efficiency. On the nitrification efficiency, with high DO concentration, as HRT or MLSS increased, the slight increment of nitrification efficiency was observed. However, under the low DO concentration, increase of MLSS and HRT resulted in larger increase of the nitrification efficiency. At the same HRT and MLSS, the nitrification efficiency increased greatly with up to 16% as DO increased. When the HRT increased from 4hr to 8hr, the denitrification efficiency slightly increased under most of conditions. However, the increase of MLSS resulted in about 19~39% denitrification efficiency increment. MLSS concentrations showed great effect on the denitrification. The increase of the DO concentration at the same HRT and MLSS resulted in decrease of denitrification efficiency with up to 27%. In all systems, the denitrification efficiency had more influence on the TN removal efficiency than nitrification efficiency. So, MLSS concentration has greater effect on the TN removal than HRT and DO. The TN removal efficiency increased as MLSS increased with up to 37%. As a result, the highest TN removal efficiency was observed 79.0% at the condition showed the highest denitrification efficiency that DO of 0.5~1.0 mg/L, an HRT of 8 hr, and 8,000 mg/L of MLSS concentration were maintained.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 경희대학교

참고문헌

  1. 김태경(2006). 생물학적 질소.인제거 공정에서 일차 침전지의 영향에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 경희대학교
  2. 박종일, 이태진(2007). 단일 반응기를 이용한 동시 질산 . 탈질에 관한 연구. 대한환경공학회지, 29(2), pp. 220-228
  3. 엄태규, 한동엽, 구인수(2002). 순환형 A/O시스템을 이용한 질소제거에 관한 연구. 상하수도학회지, 16(5), pp. 569-574
  4. 이수철, 이현용, 김동진(2000). 이중층 중공사 생물막 담체를 이용한 유동층 생물막 반응기에서의 동시 질산화와 탈질, 한국생물공학회지, 15(5), pp. 514-520
  5. 정용철, 이민재, 도중호, 백운학, 민경석(2005). 고정상 담체와 막분리를 이용한 하수고도처리 질소제거효율 특성. 대한상하수도학회. 한국물환경학회 2005년 공동 추계학술발표회 논문집, pp. F133-F139
  6. 한봉석(2007). 고정상 담체를 충진한 활성슬러지 공정에서 DO농도와 HRT 및 담체 충진율 변화가 질소 제거효율에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 경희대학교
  7. APHA, AWWA, WEF(1995). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
  8. Ekama, G. A. and Marais, G. v. R.(1984). Biological nitrogen removal, In theory, Design and Operation of Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Processes, South African Water Research Commission, Pretoria, pp. 6.1-6.26
  9. Holakoo L., George Nakhla, Amarjeet S. Bassi and Ernest K. Yanful(2006). Long term performance of MBR for biological nitrogen removal from synthetic municipal wastewater, Water Research, 66(5), pp. 849-857 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.026
  10. How Y. Ng, Slawomir W. Hermanowicz(2003). Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. Water Research, 39, pp. 981-992 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.014
  11. Levine, A. D., Tchobanoglous, G. and Asano, T.(1985). Characterization of the size distribution of contaminants in wastewater: treatment and reuse implications. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 57(7), pp. 805-816
  12. Pochana, K., Keller, J.,(1999). Study of factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification(SND). Water Science and Technology, 39(6), pp. 61-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00123-7
  13. Rodgers, M., Zhan, X. M.(2004). Biological nitrogen removal using a vertically moving biofilm system. Bioresource Technology, 93, pp. 313-319 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.017
  14. Williamson, K. and McCarty, P. L. (1976). A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films. Water Pollution Control Federation, 48(1), pp. 9-24
  15. Zhao, H. W., Mavinic, D. S., Oldham, W. K. and Koch, F. A.(1999). Controllong factors for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a two-stage intermittent aeration process treating domestic sewage. Water Research, 33(4), pp. 961-970 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00292-9