Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Crack Estimation Equation for the Reinforced Concrete Tension Member

철근콘크리트 인장부재의 균열 산정식 평가

  • 박찬욱 (한양대학교 건축환경공학과) ;
  • 노삼영 (한양대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 신은미 (한양대학교 건축환경공학과)
  • Received : 2009.03.09
  • Accepted : 2009.04.15
  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is the evaluation of the estimation equation of "CEP-FIP Model Code 1990(1991)", recently included in the domestic "Concrete Structure Design Code(2007)" in consideration of the concrete strength. As evaluation tools, crack element model applied a detailed bond-slip model as well as crack width obtained from experimental results by earlier researches. The crack element model is verified through the comparison with experimental results. The important variables in the estimation equation for the crack width in CEP-FIP Model Code 1990 are the tension stiffening effect and mean bond stress proposed in the paper to be improved in consideration of the concrete strength.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 콘크리트구조설계기준 부록에 새롭게 포함된 CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 균열 폭 산정식을 콘크리트 강도를 변수로 하여 평가하는 것에 있다, 평가 도구로 부착응력-미끌림 관계를 적용하여 구축한 균열요소모델과 기존 연구자들의 실험결과로부터 얻은 균열폭을 사용하였으며 기존 실험결과와 비교 평가함으로 검증하였다. 평가대상인 MC-90의 균열폭 산정식의 증요변수는 인장증강효과와 평균부착응력이며 이들을 균열요소모델 해석결과와 비교함으로 강도에 따라 개선된 인장증강효과와 평균부착응력을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한양대학교 친환경건축 연구센터

References

  1. 윤성호, 김준성, 염환석, 김우. 고강도 콘크리트의 인장강성효과에 대한 연구, 한국콘크리트학회 98 가을 학술발표논문집(II), 1998, pp. 495-500
  2. 김우, 이기열, 염환석, 고강도 콘크리트 인장부재의부착특성과 균열거동에 관한 연구(1), 대한토목학회논문집, 제21권 5-A호, 2001, pp. 687-697
  3. 대한건축학회, 건설교통부고시 건축구조설계기준, 대한건축학회 2005
  4. 한국콘크리트학회, 건설교통부제정 콘크리트구조설계기준 해설, 한국콘크리트학회 2007
  5. ACI, ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.2008
  6. Architectural Institute of Japan, Recommendations for Practice of Crack Control in ReinforcedRein-forced Concrete Structures, 1990, pp. 32-33
  7. Balazs, G., Cracking Analysis Based on Slip and Bond Stresses, ACI Material Journal, Vol. 90, No. 4, 1993, pp. 340-348
  8. Broms, B,B. and Lutz, L,A., Effects of Arrangement of Reinforced on Crack Width and Spacing of Reinforced Concrete Members, ACI Journal Proceedings, Vol. 62, No. 11, 1965, pp. 1395-1410
  9. CEB-FIP, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Comite Euro International Du Beton, Paris, 1991
  10. Goto, Y. and Otsuka, K., "Studies on Internal Cracks Formed in Concrete Around Deformed Tension Bars", ACI Structural Journal, Vol.68, No. 4, 1971, pp. 244-251
  11. Lorrain, M., Maurel, O. and Seffo, M.,Cracking Behavior of Reinforced HighStrength Concrete Tension Ties, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 95, No.5,1998,pp. 626-635
  12. Peter, H. Bischoff., Effects of Shrinkage onTension Stiffening and Cracking in Reinforced Concrete, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,Vol. 28, 2001. pp. 363-374 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-28-3-363
  13. Russo, G. and Romano, F., Cracking Response of RC Menbers Subjected to Uniaxial Tension,ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.118, No. 5, 1992, pp. 1172-1190 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1172)
  14. Shunsheng, Y. and Jiakui, C., Bond Slip and Crack Width Calculations of Tension Menbers, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 85, No. 4, 1988,pp. 414-422
  15. Chapra, S. C and Candle, R. C., Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw Hill, NY.2002. pp. 124-127
  16. Empelmann M., Zum nichtlinearen Trag- und Verformungsverhalten Heft 2, RWTH Aachen.1995
  17. Kreller, H., Zum nichtlinearen Trag- undVerformungsverhalten von Stahlbetonstabtragwerkenunter Last- und Zwangseinwirkung. Helft 409, Deutscher Ausschub fur Stahlbeton 1990
  18. Noh, S. Y., Kratzig. W.B., Meskouris K.,Numerical simulation of serviceability, damage evolution and failure of reinforced concrete shells, computers and structures, 2003, pp843