한국산업보건학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene)

  • 제19권2호
  • /
  • Pages.139-152
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2384-132X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0564(eISSN)
한국산업보건학회 (Korean Industrial Hygiene Association)
권호 표지

산업안전보건법에 의한 관리대상 유해물질 선정의 타당성 연구

Study on the Validity of Selection of Hazardous Substances Requiring Management on Industrial Safety and Health Act

  • 이권섭 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 조지훈 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 최진희 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 신현화 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 양정선 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Lee, Kwon Seob (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Jo, Jihoon (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Choi, Jin Hee (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Shin, Hyun Hwa (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Yang, Jeong Sun (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
  • 투고 : 2009.05.08
  • 심사 : 2009.06.18
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

According to the third study on the distribution of chemical substances carried out by the Department of Environment in 2006, there were a total of 900 chemical substances whose respective annual usage amount exceeded 1,000 tons and, among them, 90 substances belonged to the 168 hazardous substances requiring management(53.6%). The work-related illnesses caused by hazardous substances requiring management in Korea between $1992{\sim}2005$ can be classified into four groups depending on the type of the chemical substances. These four groups are 23 organic substances including benzene, 12 metals including lead, 3 acids and bases including hydrogen chloride, and 6 gaseous substances including carbon monoxide. These hazardous substances requiring management were again classified depending on the threshold limit values. The chemicals whose TLV was lower than or equal to 0.005 ppm included 4 organic substances including methylene bisphenyl isocyanate and toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI). The chemicals whose TLV was larger than 51 ppm included 22 organic substances including diethyl ether and 1,2-dichloroethylene. When we classified these hazardous substances requiring management according to the categories of GHS health hazards, we found that isobutyl acetate and magnesium oxide didn't belong to the 13 health hazard categories. Among the substances whose TLV is set and whose annual usage amount is more than 0.1 million ton, we recommended 12 chemical species including 4,4'-Methylenedianiline as new hazardous substances requiring management. All the recommended substances were found to be hazardous when we classified their health hazards.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고상백, 장세진, 강명근, 차봉석, 박종구. 직장인들의 건강수준 평가를 위한 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 분석. 예방의학회지 1997;30(2):251-266
  2. 김규상, 홍창우. 작업 특성에 따른 인간공학적 유해요인 평가방법 도구 개발에 관한 연구 - 작업 특성에 따른 근골격계 증상, 동작수행능력 및 인간공학적 평가. 한국산업안전공단 산업안전보건연구원, 2005
  3. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire. reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71(6):613-618 https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317362262
  4. Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S. The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure:What do we know about it now? Br J Hand Ther 2001a;6(4):109-118
  5. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001b;14(2):128-146
  6. Brouwer B, Mazzoni C, Pearce GW. Tracking ability in subjects symptomatic of cumulative trauma disorder: Does it relate to disability? Ergonomics 2001;44(4):443-456 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130010017868
  7. Cordobes-Gual J, Lozano-Vilardell P, Torreguitart-Mirada N, Lara-Hernandez R, Riera-Vazquez R, Julia-Montoya J. Prospective study of the functional recovery after surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35:79-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.07.013
  8. De Smet L. Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Preliminary results. Clinl Rheumatol 2004;23(3):223-224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0866-y
  9. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Loisel P. The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Canadian French. J Hand Ther 2005;18(1):34-39 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.010
  10. Fan ZJ, Smith CK, Silverstein BA. Assessing validity of the quickDASH and SF-12 as surveillance tools among workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. J Hand Ther 2008;21:354-365 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2008.02.001
  11. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Mace Y, Fermanian J, Mayoux-Benhamou A, Roren A, Rannou F, Roby-Brami A, Gautheron V, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. Validation of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (FDASH). Joint Bone Spine 2008a;75(2):195-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.04.023
  12. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Mace Y, Gautheron V, Fermanian J, Roren A, Roby-Brami A, Revel M, Poiraudeau S.Responsiveness of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (F-DASH) in patients with othopaedic and medical shoulder disorders. Joint Bone Spine 2008b;75:579-584 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.11.006
  13. Fournier K, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Arsenault J, Harris P, Gravel D. Reliability and validity of pinch and thumb strength measurements in de Quervain's disease. J Hand Ther 2006;19:2-11 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.002
  14. Fries J F, Spitz P W, Young D Y. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982;9:789-793
  15. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire:longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4(1):11 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-11
  16. Hannah SD, Hudak PL. Splinting and radial nerve palsy: A singlesubject experiment. J Hand Ther 2001;14(3):195-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80053-3
  17. Hervas MT, Navarro Collado MJ, Peiro S, Rodrigo Perez JL, Lopez Mateu P, Martinez Tello I. Spanish version of the DASH questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Med Clin(Barc) 2006;127(12):441-447 https://doi.org/10.1157/13093053
  18. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group(UECG). Development of an extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29(6):602-608 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L
  19. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments ? normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A(2):208-215 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200202000-00007
  20. Hwang JJ, Goldfarb CA, Gelberman RH, Boyer MI. The effect of dorsal carpal ganglion excesia on the scaphoid shift test. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24(1):106-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(99)90053-0
  21. Imaeda T, Toh S, Wada T, Uchiyama S, Okinaga S, Kusunose K, Sawaizumi T. Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH)questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2006;11(3):248-253 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1013-1
  22. Ishikawa H, Murasawa A, Nakazono K, Abe A, Otani H, Netsu T, Sakai T, Sata H. The patient-based outcome of upper-extremity surgeries using the DASH questionnaire and the effect of disease activity of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27(8):967-973 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0830-8
  23. Jain R, Hudak PL, Bowen CV. Validity of health status measures in patients with ulnar wrist disorders. J Hand Ther 2001;14(2):147-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80045-4
  24. Jester A, Harth A, Germann G. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2005a;30(5):1074.e1-1074.e10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.009
  25. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire:Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg Br 2005b;30(1):23-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.08.008
  26. Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Physical Therapy 1994;74(5):380-386 https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/74.5.380
  27. Kitis A, Celik E, Aslan UB, Zencir M. DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study. Appl Ergon 2009;40(2):251-255 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005
  28. Kirkley A, Griffin, S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998;26(6):764-772 https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260060501
  29. Lee EW, Lau JS, Chung MM, Li AP, Lo SK. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. J Hand Ther 2004;17(4):417-423 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(04)00183-8
  30. Lee JY, Lim JY, Oh JH, Ko YM. Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17(4):570-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.12.005
  31. Liang HW, Wang HK, Yao G, Horng YS, Hou SM. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103(10):773-779
  32. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the Short Form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg 2000;25A(2):330-340 https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0330
  33. MacDermid JC, Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 2004;17(1):18-23 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.003
  34. MacDermid JC, Drosdowech D, Faber K. Responsiveness of selfreport scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15(4):407-414 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.005
  35. MacDermid JC, Wessel J, Humphrey R, Ross D, Roth JH. Validity of self-report measures of pain and disability for persons who have undergone arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:524-530 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2006.10.018
  36. McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intraarticular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82-A(12):1701-1707 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200012000-00003
  37. Meenam RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780350102
  38. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, Askari-Ashtiani A, Karimi A, Khorsandi A, Mehdian H. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil 2008;22(8):749-757 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508085821
  39. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH). Musculoskeletal Disorders(MSDs) and Workplace Factors: A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity, and Low Back (2nd printing). Cincinnati: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(DHHS), 1997
  40. Navsarikar A, Gladmann DD, Husted JA, Cook RJ. Validity assessment of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) for patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999;26(10):2191-2194
  41. Neumann P. Inventory of tools for ergonomic evaluation. National Institute for Working Life, 2006
  42. Offenbacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand' questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 2003;62(2):168-177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7
  43. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Zanoli G, Amadio PC, Campi A. Italian version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultyral adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg 2003;28(2):179-186
  44. Raven EE, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Montfoort DO, Poll RG, Blankevoort L, Tak PP. Construct validity and reliability of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008;35(12):2334-2338 https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080067
  45. Ring D, Perey BH, Jupiter JB. The functional outcome of operative treatment of ununited fractures of the humeral diaphysis in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81(2):177-190 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199902000-00005
  46. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertrantanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991;4:143-149 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790040403
  47. Rompe JD, Overend TJ, MacDermid JC. Validation of the patientrated tennis elbow evaluation questionnaire. J Hand Ther 2007;20:3-11 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003
  48. Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM. A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Occup Environ Med 2002;59(10):664-670 https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.10.664
  49. Sauerbier M, Kluge S, Bickert B, Germann G. Subjective and objective outcomes after total wrist arthrodesis in patients with radiocarpal arthrosis or Kienbock's disease. Chir Main 2000;19:223-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1297-3203(00)73484-6
  50. Saxena P, Cutler L, Feldberg L. Assessment of the severity of hand injuries using "hand injury severity score", and its correlation with the functional outcome. Injury 2004;35:511-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00211-0
  51. Simmen BR, Bachmann LM, Drerup S, Schwyzer HK, Burkhart A, Flury MP, Goldhahn J. Usefulness of concomitant biceps tenodesis in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2008;17:921-924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.006
  52. Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Zeichen J, Bosch U. Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120(7-8):432-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020000133
  53. Solway S, Beaton DE, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH Outcome Measure User's Manual, Second Edition. Toronto:Institute for Work & Health, 2002
  54. Stucki G, Sigl T. Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17(3):451-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6942(03)00025-1
  55. Tashijian RZ, Bradley MP, Tocci S, Henn RF, Rey J, Green A. A comparison of prospective and retrospective assessment of functional outcome after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17(6):853-859 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.04.003
  56. Tashijian RZ, Bradley MP, Tocci S, Rey J, Henn RF, Green A. Factors influencing patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16(6):752-758 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.136
  57. Themistocleous GS, Goudelis G, Kyrou I, Chloros GD, Krokos A, Galanos A, Gerostathopoulos NE, Soucacos PN. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther 2006;19(3):350-357 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.014
  58. Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80A(2):154-162 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199802000-00002
  59. Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Measuring disability and symptoms of the upper limb: A validation study of the DASH questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39(9(Supplement)):S112
  60. Varju C, Balint Z, Solyom AI, Farkas H, Karpati E, Berta B, Kumanovics G, Czirjak L, Nagy Z. Cross-cultural adaptation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire into Hungarian and investigation of its validity in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26(5):776-783
  61. Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DSH-DLV). J Hand Ther 2002;15(4):347-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(02)80006-0
  62. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS-36-item short-form health survey(SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30(6):473-483 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  63. Wilcke MKT, Abbaszadegan H, Adopphson PY. Patient-perceived outcome after displaced distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 2007;20:290-299 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2007.06.001
  64. Wong YP, Fung KK, Chu ML, Chan KY. The use of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic hand injuries. J Hand Ther 2007;20:49-56 https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.004
  65. Wu A, Edgar DW, Wood FM. The QuickDASH is an appropriate tool for measuring the quality of recovery after upper limb burn injury. Burns 2007;33:843-849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.015