한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터 (Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters)

한국정보과학회 (Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers)
권호 표지

소규모 프로젝트를 위한 애자일 프레임워크 설계 및 평가

Design and Evaluation of Agile Framework for Small Projects

  • 이세영 (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터공학과) ;
  • 용환승 (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
  • 발행 : 2009.11.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 애자일 방법론을 기반으로 한 소프트웨어 개발 프레임워크(AFSP)를 설계하였다. AFSP는 화장된 스크럼 프로세스와 소규모 프로젝트에 최적화된 애자일 프랙티스로 구성된다. AFSP 프랙티스는 스크럼, XP, FDD, DSDM, 크리스탈 클리어로부터 민첩도가 높은 프랙티스를 접목함으로써 소규모 프로젝트 개발 및 관리에 보다 최적화될 수 있도록 하였으며, 소프트웨어 개발 생명 주기에 따라 6대 애자일 프로젝트 성공요소를 반영하여 효과적인 적용이 가능하도록 했다. 또한, AFSP를 소규모 웹 어플리케이션 프로젝트에 적용하고 종합적인 평가를 수행함으로써 그 효율성을 입증하였다.

In this paper, the Agile Framework for Small Projects (AFSP) was applied to four industry cases. The AFSP provides a structured way for software organizations to adopt agile practices and evaluate the results. The framework includes an extended serum process and agile practices, based on agility and critical success factors in agile software projects that are selected from Serum, XP, FDD, DSDM and Crystal Clear. The case projects were evaluated, and the analysis of the results clearly showed that the framework used in the aforementioned cases displayed a high degree of efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. I. Richardson, C.G. von Wangenheim, "Why Are Small Software Organizations Different?," IEEE Softw., vol.24, no.1, pp.18-22, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2007.12
  2. F. M. Caffery, P. S. Taylor, and G. Coleman, Adept: A Unified Assessment Method for Small Software Companies, IEEE Softw., vol.24, no.1, pp.24-31, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2007.3
  3. S. Rowe, Project Management for Small Projects, Management Concepts, 2006
  4. Agile Manifesto, Manifesto for Agile Software Development Retrieved September 2008, 2001, avail-able online at http://www.agilemanifesto.org
  5. C. Schwaber, Enterprise Agile Adoption in 2007, Forrester Research, 2008
  6. O. Salo, P. Ahrahamsson, “Agile Methods in European Embedded Development Organizations: a survey study of Extreme Programming and Scrum,” lET Softw., vol.2, pp.58-64, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen:20070038
  7. T. Dyba, T. Dingsøyr, “Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review,” Infor-mation and Software Technology, vol.50, no.9-10, pp.833-859, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
  8. A. Begel, N. Nagappan, “Usage and Perceptions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Con-text: An Exploratory Study,” 1st Int. Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Metrics, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.85
  9. B. Fitzgerald, G. Hartnett, K. Conboy, "Customi-zing agile methods to software practices at intel Shannon," European Journal of Information Sys-tems, vol.15, no.2, pp.200-213, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000605
  10. J. Sutherland, K. Schwaber, The scrum papers: nuts, bolts, and origins of an agile method, Scrum Inc., 2007
  11. J. Sutherland, G. Schoonheim, E. Rustenburg, and M. Rijk, "Fully Distributed Scrum: The Secret Sauce for Hyperproductive Offshored Development Teams," Proc. of Agile Conference 2008, pp.339-344, 2008
  12. L. Rising L, N.S. Janoff, "The Scrum Software Development Process for Small Teams," IEEE Softw, vol.17, no.4, pp.26-32, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/52.854065
  13. E. Trengove, B. Dwolatzky, "A software development process for small projects," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol.41, no.1, pp.10-27, 2004 https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.41.1.2
  14. N. Habra, S. Alexandre. J-M Desharnais, C.Y. Laporte, "A. Renault, Initiating software process improvement in very small enterprises,' Informa-tion and Software TechnoIogy, vol.50, no.7-8, pp.763-771, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.08.004
  15. L. Wang, "Agility counts in developing small-size software," IEEE Potentials. vol. 26, no.6, pp.16-23, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2007.906114
  16. B. Boehm, Get Ready for Agile Methods, with Care, IEEE Comput, vol.35, no.1, pp.64-69, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/2.976920
  17. B. Boehm, R. Turner, “Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods,” IEEE Cmput., vol.36, no.6, pp.57-66, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1204376
  18. D. Cohen, M. Lindvall, P. Costa, “An introduction to agile methods, Advances in Computers,” vol.62, pp.1-66, 2004
  19. A. Qumer, B. Henderson-Sellers, “An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering,” Information and Software Technology, vol.50, pp.280-295, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.002
  20. T. Chow, D. Cao, “A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol.81, pp.961-971, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.020
  21. A. Qumer, B. Henderson-Sellers, 'A framework to support the evluation, adoption and improvement of agile methods in practice,' The Journal of Systems and Software, vol.81, pp. 1899-1919, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.806