The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of model analysis measurements among plaster model, laser scan digital model, and cone beam CT image

석고 모형, 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형, 콘 빔 CT 영상 간의 모형 분석 계측치 비교

  • Lim, Mi-Young (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Hoon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 임미영 (조선대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 임성훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2009.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using a digital model and cone beam computed tomograph(CBCT) image for model analysis. Methods: Model analyses of CBCT images, plaster models, and digital models of 20 orthodontic patients with a permanent dentition with no proximal metal restorations, were compared. Results: The average differences of tooth size measurements were 0.01 to 0.20 mm, and the average difference of arch length discrepancy measurements were 0.41 mm in the maxilla and 0.82 mm in the mandible. The difference in Bolton discrepancy measurements was 0.17 mm for the anterior region and 0.44 mm overall but with no statistically significant difference. When comparing CBCT images with plaster models, the average differences in tooth size measurements were -0.22 to 0.01 mm, and the average differences in arch length discrepancy measurements were 0.43 mm in the maxilla and 0.32 mm in the mandible. Difference in Bolton discrepancy measurements were 0.35 mm in the anterior region and 1.25 mm overall. CBCT images showed significantly smaller overall Bolton discrepancy measurements. Conclusions: Although there were statistically significant differences in some model analysis measurements, the ranges of measurement errors of the digital model and CBCT images were clinically acceptable. Therefore, a digital model and CBCT image can be used for model analysis.

본 연구의 목적은 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형과 콘 빔 CT (CBCT) 영상을 모형 분석에 사용할 수 있는지를 평가하는 것이었다. 이를 위해 인접면에 금속 수복물을 갖지 않는 영구치열기의 20명의 교정환자에서 CBCT 영상, 석고 모형, 디지털 모형을 제작하여 각각에서 모형 분석을 시행한 후 그 계측치들을 비교하였다. 연구 결과 디지털 모형과 석고 모형을 비교 시, 치아 폭경 계측치 차이의 평균은 0.01-0.20 mm였으며, 치열궁 길이 부조화 계측치 차이의 평균은 상악 0.41 mm, 하악 0.82 mm였고, Bolton 부조화 값 차이의 평균은 전치부에서 0.17 mm, 전체에서 0.44 mm로 나타났다. CBCT 영상과 석고 모형을 비교 시 치아 폭경 계측치 차이의 평균은 0.01-0.22 mm였으며, 치열궁 길이 부조화 계측치 차이의 평균은 상악 0.43 mm, 하악 0.32 mm였고, Bolton 부조화 값 차이의 평균은 전치부에서 0.35 mm, 전체에서 1.25 mm로 나타났다. 디지털 모형과 CBCT 영상의 모형 분석을 석고 모형의 모형 분석에 비교해 볼 때 몇몇 계측치 들에서 유의한 차이가 있었으나 그 차이가 크지 않으므로 임상에서 활용 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. OrthoCAD, USA. Available at: http://www.orthocad.com
  2. Emodels, USA. Available at: http://www.dentalemodels.com
  3. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6
  4. Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:365-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70036-7
  5. Sohmura T, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi J. Use of an ultrahigh-speed laser scanner for constructing three-dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:345-52 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109786
  6. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
  7. Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 2002;3:250-4
  8. Baik HS, Lee HJ, Jeon JM. A proposal of soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using three-dimensional laser scan imaging. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:1-13
  9. Baik HS, Jeon JM, Lee HJ. A study of facial soft tissue of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a three-dimensional laser scanner. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:14-29
  10. Ko SD, Cha KS. A Study on the labial & buccal surface contour in Korean permanent teeth using three-dimensional laser scanning. Korean J Orthod 2002;32:275-91
  11. Chang YJ, Kim TW, Yoo KH. The effect of variations in the vertical position of the bracket on the crown inclination. Korean J Orthod 2002;32:401-11
  12. You HW. The optimal scanning pose generating algorithm for 3D dental model scanner [thesis]. Seoul: Myongji University;2000
  13. Park JW. The study on the measurement error of the 3D-digital model made by laser scan method [thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2003
  14. Han JH. Comparison of measurements in three-dimensional digital model and dental plaster model [thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2004.
  15. Park SI. The comparison between manual and 3D-digital measurement in dental cast measurements according to the degree of crowding [thesis]. Seoul: Korea University; 2006
  16. Holberg C, Steinhauser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Conebeam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:434-44 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-005-0519-z
  17. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021
  18. Chae JH, Song JW, Cha JY, Choi JS, Park YC. Labial and buccal surface contours of Korean normal occlusion in a three-dimensional digital model. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:95-103 https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.2.95
  19. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006;77:1261-6 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050367
  20. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:410-6 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/20987648
  21. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.008
  22. Chang J, Yenice KM, Narayana A, Gutin PH. Accuracy and feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic radiosurgery setup. Med Phys 2007;34:2077-84 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2731031
  23. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;28:113-30
  24. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25500850
  25. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
  26. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303
  27. Lee JH, Paik KS, Chang MS, Lee SP. An evaluation of validity of measurements using digital caliper and three-dimensional virtual dental models. Korean J Anat 2004;37:209-18
  28. Bolton WA. The clinical application of tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962;48:504-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(62)90129-X
  29. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7
  30. Lagravere MO, Fang Y, Carey J, Toogood RW, Packota GV, Major PW. Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:407-9 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/55276404
  31. Sim EJ, Hwang HS, Moon JD. A study on the error of tooth size measurements. Korean J Orthod 1999;29:491-501
  32. Anatomage, USA. Available at: http://www.anatomage.com
  33. OrthoProofUSA, USA. Available at: http://www.orthoproofusa.com

Cited by

  1. 3차원 전산화 단층촬영의 Nasion, Sella, Basion으로 구성된 정중 시상 평면과 정면 두부방사선 규격사진의 정중 시상 평면 비교 vol.40, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.1.6
  2. 측두 하악 관절 장애 환자의 파노라마 영상과 cone beam형 전산화 단층 영상의 비교 vol.40, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.6.364
  3. CS-3500 구강 내 스캐너로 채득된 디지털 인상의 신뢰도 및 정확도 평가 vol.15, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.5.673
  4. Accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements of resin, plaster, digital and printed study-models vol.42, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313315y.0000000016
  5. Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy vol.2016, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5075182
  6. 3차원 광학 스캐너와 콘빔CT에서 생성된 디지털 모형의 비교 vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2016.32.1.60
  7. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.46, pp.7, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160455
  8. 동영상 촬영방식의 구강스캐너로 채득된 전악치열 디지털모형의 정확도 분석 : CS-3600 시스템을 중심으로 vol.42, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.1.17