ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN THE OPERATION OF THE CLOSED MANDIBULAR FRACTURES AND THE EFFICACY OF POSTOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTICS

하악골 골절에 대한 수술 시 예방적 항생제 사용과 술후 항생제 투여의 효율성

  • Kang, Sang-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Young-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Byun, In-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Key (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital)
  • 강상훈 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 최영수 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 변인영 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김문기 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2009.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the frequency of postoperative infections in patients for a closed mandibular fracture with that without the postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients and Methods: 48 patients without any specific medical history were divided into two groups depending on whether or not antibiotics had been applied after the surgery. The 24 patients in group 1 received only a second-generation cephalosporin ($Cefotetan^{(R)}$) intravenously from admission to immediate after the surgery. Likewise, 24 patients in group 2 received 1.0g of $Cefotetan^{(R)}$ twice daily longer than the third day after surgery. The mean (SD) duration of antibiotics administration after surgery was 6.9 (${\pm}3.56$). The patients were evaluated after surgery for any postoperative infections according to the criteria: purulent drainage from a wound, spontaneous wound dehiscence accompanied by swelling, pain, and fever around the wound. Results: Postoperative infections were encountered in 2 out of 24 patients in group 1, who received antibiotic medication until shortly after surgery, and in 3 out of the 24 patients in group 2, in whom the medication was continued even after the surgery. There was no sig nificant difference in the incidence of postoperative infections between the two groups. Conclusion: From this study, postoperative use of antibiotics seems to be unnecessary with view of the little significance of the factors that could affect the wound infection.

Keywords

References

  1. Burke JF: The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961;50:161
  2. Polk HC, Jr., Lopez-Mayor JF: Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery 1969;66:97-103
  3. Greif JM, Smith AB: Relation between surgical volume and postoperative wound infection. West J Med 1984;140:99-100
  4. Harbarth S, Fankhauser C, Schrenzel J, Christenson J, Gervaz P, Bandiera-Clerc C, et al: Universal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients. JAMA 2008;299:1149-1157 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.10.1149
  5. Zallen RD, Curry JT: A study of antibiotic usage in compound mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 1975;33:431-434
  6. James RB, Fredrickson C, Kent JN: Prospective study of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 1981;39:275-281
  7. Abubaker AO, Rollert MK: Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in mandibular fractures: A preliminary randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1415-1419 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.28272
  8. Miles BA, Potter JK, Ellis E 3rd: The efficacy of postoperative antibiotic regimens in the open treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective randomized trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:576-582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.01.003
  9. Chole RA, Yee J: Antibiotic prophylaxis for facial fractures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1055-1057 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1987.01860100033016
  10. Rega AJ, Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB: Microbiology and antibiotic sensitivities of head and neck space infections of odontogenic origin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1377-1380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.023
  11. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250-278 https://doi.org/10.1086/501620
  12. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP : The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281-286 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199201303260501
  13. Farber BF, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP : Relation between surgical volume and incidence of postoperative wound infection. N Engl J Med 1981;305:200-204 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198107233050405
  14. Page CP, Bohnen JM, Feltcher JR, McManus AT, Solomkin JS, Wittmann DH : Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1993;128:79-88 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420130087014
  15. James M, Martinez EA. Antibiotics and perioperative infections. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2008;22:571-584 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2008.05.001
  16. Stoll P. Effect of prophylactic intravenous ceftriaxone in maxillofacial surgery. Chemotherapy 1987;33:291-296 https://doi.org/10.1159/000238510