대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.102-107
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지

어린이 제1대구치 근심면 초기 우식의 유병률과 최소 침습적 접근

THE PREVALENCE OF WHITE SPOT LESIONS ON THE MESIAL SURFACES OF THE 1ST MOLARS IN CHILDREN AND MINIMAL INVASIVE APPROACH - A PILOT STUDY

  • 안명기 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이금랑 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Ahn, Myung-Ki (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Geum-Lang (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.02.27
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

소아치과 임상에서는 제2유구치의 탈락 직후에 제1대구치 근심면을 직접 관찰하고 여기에 발생한 백반양 초기 우식병소를 목격할 기회가 많다. 유구치와는 달리, 잔존 기대수명이 매우 긴 제1대구치의 경우에는 근심면 초기 우식병소에 대하여 와동형성에 이은 전통적인 수복치료를 하거나 아무런 조치 없이 방관하는 것은 부적절할 것으로 사료되어, 본 연구는 이 시기 어린이들에 있어서 제1대구치 근심면 초기 우식의 유병률을 조사하고 이에 적합한 조치를 모색할 목적으로 시도되었다. 본 연구는 6개월간 부산대학교병원 소아치과에 내원한 어린이 중 제2유구치를 발거하여 제1대구치의 근심면을 직접 관찰할 수 있었던 어린이들의 124개 제1대구치를 대상으로, 근심면 백반양 초기 우식병소의 유병률을 조사하였다. 그리고 그 진행을 차단하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 평활면 초기 우식병소를 가진 치아 시편에 복합레진 접착제만 도포하거나 접착제에 이어 전색제를 도포하고 온도순환과 염색을 시행한 후, 단면을 통하여 미세누출 여부를 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 124개 관찰대상 치아 중 제1대구치 근심면이 건전한 경우는 34%에 불과하였으며, 백반양 초기 우식병소를 가진 것은 53%, 이미 우식와동이 확인된 것은 13%였다. 2. 접착제나 접착제와 전색제를 도포한 시료의 단면 관찰에서는 두군 모두에서 20% 정도의 미세 누출을 보였다. 결론적으로, 어린이 제1대구치 근심면의 초기 우식은 매우 높은 유병률을 보여 이에 대한 보다 적극적인 대처와 효율적인 비침습적 접근방법이 모색되어야 할 것으로 생각되었다.

In clinical pediatric dentistry, we have many chances to encounter the white spot like incipient enamel lesions on the mesial surfaces of the 1st molars with direct vision, especially just after the 2nd primary molars were exfoliated. But it was thought highly desirable to assess if these lesions are properly and effectively managed yet. This study aims at surveying the prevalence of incipient lesions on the mesial surfaces of the 1st molars in children through direct observation and examining the suitability of adhesive sealing on them as a pilot trial in searching for their proper management. 1. Among the 124 mesial surfaces of the 1st molars examined, 34% were sound, 53% had incipient carious lesions and 13% had cavitated lesions. 2. In the sectional views of the specimens, 20% showed microleakage after thermo-cycling and it was thought not recommendable as a permanent method. Therefore in order to effectively fight against the incipient caries lesions in children‘s permanent teeth, it was thought proper not to rely on any one method, but to perform reinforcing oral hygiene and promotion of remineralization in combination with therapeutic sealing which is stronger in short-term sealing effect. Although therapeutic sealing has been considered as the core in minimally invasive concept to treat the white spot lesions, its long-term clinical trials have not been suggested. Continuous research is strongly required for making this approach to acquire permanent nature, especially in regards of proper pretreatment and high molecular materials deeply penetrable into enamel.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hintze H : Approximal caries prevalence in Danish recruits and progression of caries in the late teens: a retrospective radiographic study. Caries Res, 35:27-35, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047427
  2. Foster LV : Three year in vivo investigation to determine the progression of approximal primary carious lesions extending into dentin. Br Dent J, 185:353-357, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809812
  3. Featherstone JD : Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27:31-40, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x
  4. Ferreira MA, Mendes NS : Factors associated with active white enamel lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent 15:327-334, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00641.x
  5. Christensen GJ : Initial carious lesions: when should they be restored? J Am Dent Assoc, 131:1760-1762, 2000.
  6. Stahl J, Zandona AF : Rationale and protocol for the treatment of non-cavitated smooth surface carious lesions. Gen Dent 55:105-111, 2007.
  7. Artun J, Thylstrup A : Clinical and scanning electron microscopic study of surface changes of incipient caries lesions after debonding. Scand J Dent Res, 94:193-201, 1986.
  8. Holmen L, Thylstrup A, Artun J : Surface changes during the arrest of active enamel caries lesions in vivo. A scanning electron microscope study. Acta Odontol Scand, 45:383-390, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358709096362
  9. Holmen L, Thylstrup A, Artun J : Clinical and histological features observed during arrestment of actie enamel carious lesions in vivo. Caries Res, 21:546- 554, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261065
  10. Thylstrup A : How should we manage initial and secondary caries? Quintessence Int, 29:594-598, 1998.
  11. Kuroiwa M, Kodaka T, Abe M, et al. : Brushing-induced effects with and without a non-fluoride abrasive dentifrice on remineralization of enamel surfaces etched with phosphoric acid. Caries Res, 28:309-314, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261993
  12. Sullivan RJ, Fletcher R, Bachiman R, et al. : Intraoral comparison and evaluation of the ability of fluoride dentifrices to promote the remineralization of caries-like lesions in dentin and enamel. J Clin Dent, 6:135-138, 1995.
  13. 신영림, 송근배, 김교한 : 불소 용액 양치 및 불소 이온 도입법에 의한 불소 도포가 초기 법랑질 탈회병소의 재석회화에 미치는 영향. 대한소아치과학회지, 18:441-447, 1994.
  14. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Mueller J, et al. : Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro. Caries Res, 40:124-129, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091058
  15. Gomez SS, Onetto JE, Uribe SA, et al. : Therapeutic seal of approximal incipient noncavitated carious lesions: technique and case reports. Quintessence Int, 38:e99-105, 2007.
  16. Robinson C, Hallsworth AS, Weatherell JA, et al. : Arrest and control of carious lesions: a study based on preliminary experiments with resorcinolformaldehyde resin. J Dent Res, 55:812-818, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550051601
  17. Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Ellwood R: Efficacy of sealing proximal early active lesions: an 18-month clinical study evaluated by conventional and subtraction radiography. Caries Res, 40:382-388, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094282
  18. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S : Managing approximal carious lesions: a new non-operative approach. Caries Res, 38:361, 2004.
  19. Mejare I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H, et al. : Caries development from 1 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiography study. Caries Res, 32:10-16, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016424
  20. Ferreria MA, Mendes NS : Factors associated with enamel lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent, 15:327-334, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00641.x
  21. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V : Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive lesions. Caries Res, 33:252-260, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016526
  22. Gomez SS, Basili CP, Emilson CG : A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed non-cavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents. Clin Oral Investig, 9:239-243, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0010-7
  23. Simonsen RJ : Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Paediatr Dent, 24:393-414, 2002.
  24. Robinson C, Brookes SJ, Kiskham J, et al. : In vitro studies of the penetration of adhesive resins into artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res, 3:136-141, 2001.
  25. Van M, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. : Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent, 6:119-144, 2001.
  26. Simonsen RJ : Pit and fissures sealants: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent, 24:393-414, 2002.
  27. Gomez S, Uribe S, Onetto JE, et al. : SEM analysis of sealant penetration in posterior approximal enamel carious lesions in vivo. J Adhes Dent, 10:151-156, 2008.
  28. Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE : Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general practice. Acta Odontol Scand, 58:97-101, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163500429208
  29. Ericson D, Kidd E, McComb D, et al. : Minimally invasive dentistry-concepts and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent, 1:59-72, 2003.
  30. Stephens RG, Kogon SL, Reid JA : Non-invasive therapy for proximal enamel caries: An expanded role for bitewing radiography. J Can Dent Assoc, 8:619-622, 1987.
  31. 모경희, 윤정훈, 김수관 등 : 레이저 형광법을 이용한 인접면 우식증 탐지 효과. 대한소아치과학회지, 31:323-330, 2004.
  32. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V : Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res, 82:117-122, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200208
  33. Ektrand KR, Bruun G, Bruun M : Plaque and gingival status as indicators for caries progression on approximal surfaces. Caries Res, 32:41-45, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016428