The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An in-vitro wear study of human enamel opposing heat-pressed ceramics

2종의 열가압 도재와 법랑질 간의 마모에 관한 연구

  • Park, Chan-Yong (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 박찬용 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 대학원) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 대학원) ;
  • 윤미정 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2009.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the wear characteristics of human enamel opposing 2 heat-pressed ceramics (e.max Press and Empress Esthetic), conventional feldspathic porcelain (Ceramco 3) and type III gold alloy. Material and methods: Intact cusps of extracted premolars were used for enamel specimens. Five disk samples were made for each of two heat-pressed ceramics groups, conventional feldspathic porcelain group and type III gold alloy group. Wear tests were conducted in distilled water using a pin-on-disk tribometer. The amount of enamel wear was determined by weighing the enamel specimens before and after wear tests, and the weight was converted to volumes by average density. The wear tracks were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and surface profilometer to elucidate the wear characteristics. Results: 1. Ceramco 3 led to the greatest amount of enamel wear followed by Empress Esthetic, e.max Press and type III gold alloy. However, there was no significant difference between Ceramco 3 and Empress Esthetic (P>.05), and there were also no significant differences among Empress Esthetic, e.max Press and type III gold alloy (P>.05). 2. The average surface roughness of e.max Press after wear test was smallest followed by Empress Esthetic and Ceramco 3, but there was no significant difference between Empress Esthetic and Ceramco 3 (P>.05). 3. There were no significant differences among the depth of wear tracks of all the groups (P>.05). The group that showed the largest width of wear track was Ceramco 3 followed by Empress Esthetic, e.max Press and type III gold alloy. However, there was no significant difference between e.max Press and Empress Esthetic (P>.05), and there was also no significant difference between Empress Esthetic and Ceramco 3 (P>.05). Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, heat-pressed ceramics were not more abrasive than conventional feldspathic porcelain.

연구목적: 2종의 열가압 도재 (e.max Press, Empress Esthetic)와 법랑질 간의 마모양상을 알아보기 위하여 장석계 도재 및 제 3형 금합금과 비교, 관찰하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 열가압 도재 e.max Press, Empress Esthetic 및 금속도재관 제작용 장석계 도재 Cermaco 3, 제 3형 금합금으로 원반형 시편을 제작하고, 상대 마모재로는 발거된 건전한 소구치의 교두를 이용하여 Pin-on-disk tribometer 상에서 마모시험 하였다. 법랑질의 마모량은 마모 전후 치아 시편의 무게 변화를 측정하여 부피로 환산하였고, 도재 및 금합금 시편의 평균 표면 조도와 마모트랙 깊이를 표면조도기로, 마모트랙 폭을 주사전자현미경으로 측정하여 마모 양상을 비교하였다. 결과: 1. 법랑질의 마모량은 Ceramco 3군에서 가장 크고 Empress Esthetic군, e.max Press군, 금합금군 순으로 작았으며, Ceramco 3군과 Empress Esthetic군 사이와, Empress Esthetic군, e.max Press군 및 금합금군 사이에는 유의한 차이가 없었다 (P>.05). 2. 마모시험 후 도재 시편의 평균 표면 조도는 Ceramco 3군, Empress Esthetic군, e.max Press군 순으로 작았으며, Empress Esthetic군과 Ceramco 3군 사이에는 유의한 차이가 없었다 (P>.05). 3. 마모트랙의 깊이는 모든 군 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었고 (P>.05), 마모트랙의 폭은 법랑질 마모량 순서와 동일하게 Ceramco 3군, Empress Esthetic군, e.max Press군, 금합금군 순으로 작았으며, e.max Press군과 Empress Esthetic군 사이 및 Empress Esthetic군과 Ceramco 3군 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다 (P>.05). 결론: 열가압 도재는 장석계 도재보다 법랑질을 더 마모시키지는 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700031301
  2. Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim YL, Dong JK. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown: The effect of occlusal using depth and axial inclination on lower first molar. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:48-60.
  3. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three allceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:459-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005
  4. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-60
  5. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84
  6. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th ed, Mosby, St. Louis MO, 2006
  7. Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003
  8. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740060301
  9. Liu YH, Feng HL, Bao YW, Qiu Y. Effect of core: dentin thickness ratio on the flexure strength of IPS Empress II heat-pressed all-ceramic restorative material. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2007;39:64-6
  10. Wiley MG. Effects of porcelain on occluding surfaces of restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:133-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90360-0
  11. DeLong R, Sasik C, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater 1989;5:266-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90073-0
  12. Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-9 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0018
  13. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-4 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601
  14. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT Jr, Duncanson MG Jr. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90254-T
  15. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:275-81 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00086.x
  16. Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:8-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00008.x
  17. Eom SH, Oh SC, Dong JK. A study on the wear of dental restorative materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:514-23
  18. Ramp MH, Suzuki S, Cox CF, Lacefield WR, Koth DL. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:523-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70146-X
  19. McLaren EA, Giordano II RA, Pober R, Abozenada B. Material testing and layering techniques of a New twophase all-glass veneering porcelain for bonded porcelain and high-alumina frameworks. Quintessence Dent Technol 2003;26:69-81
  20. Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:299-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90191-0
  21. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-6
  22. Graf H. Occlusal forces during function. In, Rowe NH, Occlusion: Research on form and function. University of Michigan; Ann Arbor; 1975: pp. 90-111
  23. Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:313-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70189-6
  24. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123851
  25. Drummond JL, King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater 2000;16:226-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00013-0
  26. Grossman DG. Structure and physical properties of Dicor/MGC glass-ceramic. In: Mormann WH, editor. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Chicago; Quintessence; 1991. pp. 103-15

Cited by

  1. Friction and Wear Characteristics of ABS-like Resin for 3D Printing Under Non-Lubricated Condition vol.36, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7736/kspe.2019.36.12.1117